Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1118-1123

  Van Leijsen, S A L ^a   Kluivers, K B ^a   Mol, B W J ^b   Broekhuis, S R ^a   Milani, A L ^c   Bongers, M Y ^d   Aalders, C I M ^e   Dietz, V ^f   Malmberg, G G A ^g   Vierhout, M E ^a   Heesakkers, J P F A ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^d MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^g SLINGELAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

diagnostic; outcome; stress incontinence; surgery; urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URINARY TRACT SURGERY; URODYNAMICS;

ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, UROLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84865234523     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22230     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Groenendijk AG, Vervest HAM, van der Vaart CH, et al. Richtlijn Urine-Incontinentie (Guideline Urinary Incontinence) Ned Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie. Sept 2004. Available from: http://www. kwaliteitskoepel.nl/assets/structured-files/overigNVOG/Urine-incontinentie.pdf
2. Venema PL, van Geelen JM, Kil PJM, et al. Richtlijn Stressincontinentie bij de vrouw (Guideline Stress Incontinence in women). Nederlandse Vereniging voor Urologie. 2003. Available from: http://www.nvu.nl/uploads/I6/Lh/ I6LhkzQVlv3tmb2ZSU3KAA/15stressinconnentie30-07-0.pdf
3. NICE. Urinary incontinence. The management of urinary incontinence in women. NICE Clinical Guideline 40. 2006. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/ nicemedia/pdf/CG40NICEguideline.pdf
4. Agur W, Housami F, Drake M, et al. Could the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines on urodynamics in urinary incontinence put some women at risk of a bad outcome from stress incontinence surgery ? BJU Int 2009; 103: 635-9.
5. Wang AC, Chen MC,. The correlation between preoperative voiding mechanism and surgical outcome of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure, with reference to quality of life. BJU Int 2003; 91: 502-6. (Pubitemid 36570570)
6. Colombo M, Zanetta G, Vitobello D, et al. The Burch colposuspension for women with and without detrusor overactivity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 255-60. (Pubitemid 26072735)
7. Chapple CR,. Primer: Questionnaires versus urodynamics in the evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction-one, both or none ? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2005; 2: 555-64. (Pubitemid 43115075)
8. Okorocha I, Cumming G, Gould I,. Female urodynamics and lower urinary tract infection. BJU Int 2002; 89: 863-7. (Pubitemid 34535417)
9. Siracusano S, Knez R, Tiberio A, et al. The usefulness of antibiotic prophylaxis in invasive urodynamics in postmenopausal female subjects. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19: 939-42. (Pubitemid 351772625)
10. Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P,. Prophylactic antibiotics in urodynamics: A systematic review of effectiveness and safety. Neurourol Urodyn 2008; 27: 167-73. (Pubitemid 351399304)
11. Choe JH, Lee JS, Seo JT,. Urodynamic studies in women with stress urinary incontinence: Significant bacteriuria and risk factors. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26: 847-51.
12. Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquarius AE, et al. Predictive value of urodynamics on outcome after midurethral sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 649 e1-12.
13. Nager CW, FitzGerald M, Kraus SR, et al. Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women. J Urol 2008; 179: 1470-4.
14. Thompson PK, Duff DS, Thayer PS,. Stress incontinence in women under 50: Does urodynamics improve surgical outcome ? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11: 285-9.
15. Koops SE, Bisseling TM, van Brummen HJ, et al. What determines a successful tension-free vaginal tape? A prospective multicenter cohort study: Results from The Netherlands TVT database. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 65-74. (Pubitemid 43017776)
16. Glazener CM, Lapitan MC,. Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (3):CD003195.
17. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, et al. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 291-306. (Pubitemid 24358745)
18. Yalcin I, Bump RC,. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 98-101. (Pubitemid 36886531)
19. Lemack GE, Zimmern PE,. Predictability of urodynamic findings based on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire. Urology 1999; 54: 461-6. (Pubitemid 29407022)
20. van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: The urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn 2003; 22: 97-104. (Pubitemid 36222868)
21. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 261-74. (Pubitemid 34411846)
22. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 4-20.
23. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D,. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 1063-70.
24. Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquarius AE, et al. Risk factors for failure of retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 202e1-8.
25. Paick JS, Oh SJ, Kim SW, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape, suprapubic arc sling, and transobturator tape in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19: 123-9. (Pubitemid 350193865)
26. Lai HH, Simon M, Boone TB,. The impact of detrusor overactivity on the management of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep 2006; 7: 354-62. (Pubitemid 44884754)
27. Duckett JR, Tamilselvi A,. Effect of tension-free vaginal tape in women with a urodynamic diagnosis of idiopathic detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. BJOG 2006; 113: 30-3.
28. Nager CW, Kraus SR, Kenton K, et al. Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 1306-11.
29. van Leijsen SA, Hoogstad-van Evert JS, Mol BW, et al. The correlation between clinical and urodynamic diagnosis in classifying the type of urinary incontinence in women. A systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn 2011; 30: 495-502.
30. Turker P, Kilic G, Tarcan T,. The presence of transurethral cystometry catheter and type of stress test affect the measurement of abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 536-9.
31. Reynard JM, Lim C, Swami S, et al. The obstructive effect of a urethral catheter. J Urol 1996; 155: 901-3. (Pubitemid 26052674)
32. van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Protocol for the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery (VUSIS) study: A multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of urodynamics in women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in whom surgical treatment is considered. BMC Womens Health 2009; 9: 22.