Women’s attitudes to urodynamics: A questionnaire survey

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 106, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 851-856

  Gorton, Emma ^a   Stanton, Stuart ^a  

^a ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; URODYNAMICS;

ANXIETY; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; FEMALE UROGENITAL DISEASES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0032777824     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08408.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brocklehurst JC. Urinary incontinence in the community-analysis of a MORI poll. BMJ 1993; 306: 832-834.
2. Jarvis GJ, Hall S, Stamp S, Millar DR, Johnson A. An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women. Br J Obsrer Gynaecol 1980; 87: 893-896.
3. Haylen BT, Sutherst JR, Frazer MI. Is the investigation of most stress incontinence really necessary Br J Urol 1989; 64: 147-149.
4. Bergman A, Bader K. Reliability of the patient's history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence. Znt J Gynecol Obstet 1990; 32: 255-259.
5. Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates KW, Bump RC. Clinical predictors of urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obster Gynecol 1997; 177: 262-266.
6. Clarke B. The role of urodynamic assessment in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract disorders. Int Umgynecol J 1997; 8: 196-200.
7. Payne SR, McKenning ST, Pead IJ, Tirnoney AG, den Hollander D, Maskell RM. Microbiological look at urodynamic studies. Lancet 1988; 2: 1123-1126.
8. Maskell R, Pead L, Vinnicombe J. Urinary infection after micturating cystography. Lancet 1978; 2: 1191-1192.
9. Sabanathan K, Duffin HM, Castleden CM. Urinary tract infection after cystometry. Age Ageing 1985; 14: 291-295.
10. Harari D, Malone-Lee J, Ridgway GL. An age related investigation of urinary tract symptoms and infection following urodynamic studies. Age Ageing 1994; 23: 62-64.
11. Walter S, Vejlsgaard R. Diagnostic Catheterisation and bacteruria in women. Br J Urol 1978; 50: 106-108.
12. Coptcoat MJ, Reed J, Cumming J, Shah PJR, Worth PHL. Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary for routine urodynamic investigations Br J Urol 1988; 61: 302-303.
13. Bergrnan A, McCarthy TA. Antibiotic prophylaxis after instrumentation for urodynamic testing. Br J Urol 1983; 55: 568-569.
14. Carter PG, Lewis P, Abrams P. Urodynamic Morbidity and dysuria prophylaxis. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 40-41.
15. Klingler HC, Madersbacher S, Djavan B, Schatzl G, Marberger M, Schmidbauer CP. Morbidity of the evaluation of the lower urinary tract with transurethral multichannel pressure-flow studies. J Uml 1998; 159: 191-194.
16. Cutinha PE, Potts LK, Fleet C, Rosario D, Chapple CR. Morbidity following pressure flow studies (PFS) are prophylactic antibiotics necessary Neurouml Urodyn 1996; 4 304-305.
17. Gonnermann O, Höfner K, Krah H, Grünewald V, Jonas U. Urodynamics-assessment of morbidity. Neurourol Urodyn 1996; 15: 305-306.
18. Benness C, Manning J. Patient evaluation of urodynamic investigations. Neurourol Urodyn 1997; 16: 509-510.
19. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1829-1843.