A praise for reviewers: How do we reward them?

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 212-213

  Fuster, Valentin ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; FEE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICIAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; REWARD; UNITED STATES;

CARDIOLOGY; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REWARD; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922658749     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (3)

1. Stahel PF, Moore EE. Peer review for biomedical publications: We can improve the system. BMC Medicine 2014;12:179
2. Smith R. Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med 2006; 99:178-82
3. Venkitasubramniam P, Sahai A. Incentivizing anonymous 'peer-to-peer reviews. IEEE 10.1109/ ALLERTON.2008.4797625.