Incentivizing anonymous "peer-to-peer" reviews

46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 692-699

  Venkitasubramaniam, Parv ^a   Sahai, Anant ^b  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEER TO PEERS; POTENTIALLY UNSTABLE; REPUTATION SYSTEMS; REVIEW CYCLES; SCORING SYSTEMS;

EID: 64549102077     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ALLERTON.2008.4797625     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. C. Kerr, "View from the bridge," Time Magazine, Nov. 1958.
2. G. Hardin, "The tragedy of the commons," Science, vol. 162, no. 3859, Dec. 1968.
3. J. M. Campanario, "Peer review for journals as it stands today: part 1," Science Communication, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 181-211, Mar. 1998.
4. -, "Peer review for journals as it stands today: part 2," Science Communication, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 277-306, Jun. 1998.
5. R. Smith, "Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals," Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 99, pp. 178-182, 2006.
6. G. Ellison, "The slowdown of the economics publishing process," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 947-993, Oct. 2002.
7. -, "Evolving standards for academic publishing: a q-r theory," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 994-1034, Oct. 2002.
8. A. Chong, "On the lags between submission and acceptance: are all referees created equal?" Applied Economics Letters, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 423-425, 2001. [9] D. S. Hamermesh, "Facts and myths about refereeing," The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 153-163, 1994.
9. O. H. Azar, "The review process in economics: is it too fast?" Southern Economic Journal, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 482-491, 2005.
10. M. Engers and J. Gans, "Why referees are not paid (enough)," The American Economic Review, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1341-1349, Dec. 1998.
11. J. jen Chang and C. chong Lai, "Is it worthwhile to pay referees," Southern Economic Journal, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 457-463, Oct. 2001.
12. Y. Riyanto and I. H. Yetkiner, "A market mechanism for scientific communication: a proposal," KYKLOS, vol. 55, pp. 563-568, 2002.
13. R. K. Goel, "A market mechanism for scientific communication: a comment," KYKLOS, vol. 56, pp. 395-400, 2003.
14. Y. Riyanto and I. H. Yetkiner, "A market mechanism for scientific communication: reply," KYKLOS, vol. 56, pp. 401-404, 2003.
15. B. Cohen, "Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent," in Proceedings of the 2nd IPTPS, Berkeley, CA, Feb. 2003.
16. D. Qiu and R. Srikant, "Modeling and performance analysis of bittorrent-like peer-to-peer networks," SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 367-378, Oct. 2004. [Online]. Available: http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1030194.1015508
17. M. Li, J. Yu, and J. Wu, "Free-riding on bittorrent-like peer-to-peer file sharing systems: Modeling analysis and improvement," vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 954-966, Jul. 2008.
18. P. Resnick, R. Zeckhauser, E. Friedman, and K. Kuwabara, "Reputatation systems," Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 45-48, Dec. 2000.
19. C. Dellarocas, "How often should reputation mechanisms update a trader's reputation profile?" Information Systems Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 271-285, Sep. 2006.
20. M. Fan, Y. Tan, and A. B. Whinston, "Evaluation and design of online cooperative feedback mechanisms for reputation management," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 244-254, Feb. 2005.
21. K. Ranganathan, M. Ripeanu, A. Sarin, and I. Foster, "'to share or not to share' an analysis of incentives to contribute in file sharing environments," in Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Jun. 2003.
22. V. Vishnumurthy, S. Chandrakumar, and E. G. Sirer, "KARMA: A secure economic framework for P2P resource sharing," in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley, CA, Jun. 2003.
23. H. T. Kung and C. H. Wu, "Differentiated admission for peer-to-peer systems: incentivizing peers to contribute their resources," in Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley, CA, Jun. 2003.
24. M. Belenkiy, M. Chase, C. C. Erway, J. Jannotti, A. Küpcü, A. Lysyanskaya, and E. Rachlin, "Making P2P accountable without losing privacy," in Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Privacy in electronic society. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 31-40.
25. S. Marti and H. Garcia-Molina, "Identity crisis: anonymity vs reputation in P2P systems," in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, Sep. 2003, pp. 134-141.
26. F. Godlee, C. R. Gale, and C. N. Martyn, "Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial," Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 280, no. 3, pp. 237-240, Jul. 1998.
27. R. Dingledine, N. Mathewson, and P. Syverson, "Reputation in P2P anonymity systems," in Proceedings of Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley, CA, Jun. 2003.
28. S. Bowles, "Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine 'the moral sentiments': evidence from economic experiments," Science, vol. 320, Jun. 2008.
29. "NIH peer review report final draft," Jul. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/meetings/ NIHPeerReviewReportFINALDRAFT.pdf