Exploratory patent search with faceted search and configurable entity mining

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 968, Issue , 2013, Pages 39-47

  Fafalios, Pavlos ^a   Salampasis, Michail ^b   Tzitzikas, Yannis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE; METADATA; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; SEMANTICS;

FACETED SEARCH; INTERACTION SCHEMES; LINKED DATUM; PATENT DOCUMENTS; PATENT SEARCH; QUERY TIME; SEARCH METHOD;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 84922651059     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. A. Aula, N. Jhaveri, and M. Käki. Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2005.
2. D. Bonino, A. Ciaramella, and F. Corno. Review of the state-of-the-art in patent information and forthcoming evolutions in intelligent patent informatics. World Patent Information, 32(1), 2010.
3. B. Bishop, A. Kiryakov, D. Ognyanov, I. Peikov, Z. Tashev, and R. Velkov. Factforge: A fast track to the web of data. Semantic Web, 2(2):157-166, 2011.
4. S. Bashir and A. Rauber. Improving retrievability of patents in prior-art search. Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 457-470, 2010.
5. Jeffrey Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat. Mapreduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51(1):107-113, 2008.
6. P. Fafalios, I. Kitsos, Y. Marketakis, C. Baldassarre, M. Salampasis, and Y. Tzitzikas. Web searching with entity mining at query time. In Proceedings of the 5th Information Retrieval Facility Conference, July 2012.
7. P. Fafalios and Y. Tzitzikas. Exploiting available memory and disk for scalable instant overview search. Web Information System Engineering, pages 101-115, 2011.
8. C.G. Harris, S. Foster, R. Arens, and P. Srinivasan. On the role of classification in patent invalidity searches. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Patent information retrieval. ACM, 2009.
9. Allan Hanbury, Veronika Zenz, and Helmut Berger. 1st international workshop on advances in patent information retrieval. SIGIR Forum, 44(1), 2010.
10. H. Joho, L.A. Azzopardi, and W. Vanderbauwhede. A survey of patent users: an analysis of tasks, behavior, search functionality and system requirements. In Procs of the 3rd symposium on Information interaction in context. ACM, 2010.
11. M. Käki and A. Aula. Findex: improving search result use through automatic filtering categories. Interacting with Computers, 17(2):187-206, 2005.
12. M. Käki. Findex: search result categories help users when document ranking fails. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2005.
13. J. Kim, I.S. Kang, and J.H. Lee. Cluster-based patent retrieval using international patent classification system. Computer Processing of Oriental Languages. Beyond the Orient: The Research Challenges Ahead, pages 205-212, 2006.
14. I.S. Kang, S.H. Na, J. Kim, and J.H. Lee. Cluster-based patent retrieval. Information processing & management, 43(5):1173-1182, 2007.
15. S. Kopidaki, P. Papadakos, and Y. Tzitzikas. Stc+ and nm-stc: Two novel online results clustering methods for web searching. Web Information Systems Engineering, 2009.
16. L.S. Larkey. A patent search and classification system. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries, volume 11, 1999.
17. Mihai Lupu, Allan Hanbury, and Andreas Rauber. 4th international workshop on patent information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
18. H. Mase, T. Matsubayashi, Y. Ogawa, M. Iwayama, and T. Oshio. Proposal of two-stage patent retrieval method considering the claim structure. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 4(2):190-206, 2005.
19. M. Osborn, T. Strzalkowski, and M. Marinescu. Evaluating document retrieval in patent database: a preliminary report. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 1997.
20. Panagiotis Papadakos, Nikos Armenatzoglou, Stella Kopidaki, and Yannis Tzitzikas. On exploiting static and dynamically mined metadata for exploratory web searching. Knowledge and Information Systems, 30:493-525, 2012.
21. W. Pratt and L. Fagan. The usefulness of dynamically categorizing search results. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7(6):605-617, 2000.
22. P. Papadakos, S. Kopidaki, and Y. Armenatzoglou, N.and Tzitzikas. Exploratory web searching with dynamic taxonomies and results clustering. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Digital Libraries, September 2009.
23. F.M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th World Wide Web conference, 2007.
24. G.M. Sacco and Y. Tzitzikas. Dynamic taxonomies and faceted search: theory, practice, and experience. Springer, 2009.
25. Y.H. Tseng, C.J. Lin, and Y.I. Lin. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing & Management, 43(5):1216-1247, 2007.
26. J. Tang, B. Wang, Y. Yang, P. Hu, Y. Zhao, X. Yan, B. Gao, M. Huang, P. Xu, W. Li, et al. Patentminer: topic-driven patent analysis and mining. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 2012.
27. X. Xue and W.B. Croft. Transforming patents into prior-art queries. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2009.
28. O. Zamir and O. Etzioni. Web document clustering: A feasibility demonstration. In Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 1998.