Proposal of Two-Stage Patent Retrieval Method Considering the Claim Structure

ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 190-206

  Mase, Hisao ^a   Matsubayashi, Tadataka ^a   Ogawa, Yuichi ^a   Iwayama, Makoto ^a   Oshio, Tadaaki ^b  

^a HITACHI LTD   (Japan)

^b Japan Patent Information Organization (Japio)   (Japan)

Author keywords

Algorithms; claim structure; Experimentation; Languages; Patent retrieval; relevant score calculation; term extraction; term weighting

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016706269     PISSN: 15300226     EISSN: 15583430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1105696.1105702     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bear, J. et al. 1997. Using information extraction to improve document retrieval. In Proceedings of the Sixth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-6). 367-378
2. Fujii, A. et al. 2004. Overview of patent retrieval task at NTCIR-4. In Working Notes of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop Meeting. 225-232
3. Clarke, C. L. et al. 1997. Relevance ranking for one to three term queries. In Proceedings of RIAO-97, 5th International Conference “Recherche d'InformationAssisteepar Ordinateur” 388-400
4. Itoh, H. 2004. NTCIR-4 patent retrieval experiments at RICOH. In Working Notes of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop Meeting. 246-249
5. Kando, N. 2004. Overview of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop. In Working Notes of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop Meeting. i-viii
6. Konishi, K. et al. 2004. Invalidity patent search system of NTT DATA. In Working Notes of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop Meeting. 250-255
7. Mase, H. et al. 1996. Experimental simulation for automatic patent categorization. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. 377-382
8. Mase, H. et al. 2004. Two-stage patent retrieval method considering claim structure. In Working Notes of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop Meeting. 256-261
9. Matsumoto, Y. 2000. Morphological analysis system “Chasen.” J. Information Processing Society of Japan. 41, 11 (2000), 1208-1214 (in Japanese)
10. Mizuno, Y. 2002. Relevant document retrieval system. Tokugikon J. 223 (2000) (in Japanese)
11. NTCIR3 2002. Proceedings of the Third NTCIR Workshop on Research in Information Retrieval, Automatic Text Summarization and Question Answering.
12. NTCIR4 2004. Working Notes of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop Meeting.
13. Salton, G. and Mcgill, M. J. 1983. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York
14. Sarasua, L. and Corremans, G. 2000. Cross lingual issues in patent retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000 Workshop on Patent Retrieval.
15. Shinmori, A. et al. 2003. Patent claim processing for readability structure analysis and term explanation. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Conference. 56-65
16. Sigir 2000. Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000 Workshop on Patent Retrieval.
17. Sumner, R. G., Jr. Shaw, W. M., Jr. 1997. An investigation of relevance feedback using adaptive linear and probabilistic models. The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). E. M. Voorhees and D. K. Harman (eds.)
18. Takano, A. et al. 2002. Development of the generic association engine for processing large corpora
19. Takeuchi, H. et al. 2004. Experiments on patent retrieval at NTCIR-4 Workshop. In Working Notes of the Fourth NTCIR Workshop Meeting. 271-276