Review of the state-of-the-art in patent information and forthcoming evolutions in intelligent patent informatics

World Patent Information

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 30-38

  Bonino, Dario ^a   Ciaramella, Alberto ^b   Corno, Fulvio ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b INVENTO srl   (Italy)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Patent informatics; Review; Semantic elaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 72449204627     PISSN: 01722190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wpi.2009.05.008     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Adams SR. Information sources in patents: an overview of international patents, K.G. Saur, 2006, ISBN: 3598244436, 9783598244438.
2. WIPO, Strasbourg agreement concerning the international patent classification, Legislative texts WO026EN, September 1979.
3. WIPO, Recommendation for the processing of patent information using XML (eXtensible Markup Language), STANDARD ST.36, November 2007.
4. Thielemann, W. Ocr errors in patent full text documents. In: Information retrieval facility, 2007.
5. Wretblad L, Sayeler J. IPR system error!. In: information retrieval facility, 2007.
6. Hunt D, Nguyen L, Rodgers M, editors. Patent searching: tools and techniques. John Wiley and Sons; 2007.
7. Wanner L., Baeza-Yates R., Brügmann S., Codina J., Diallo B., Escorsa E., et al. Towards content-oriented patent document processing. World Patent Inform 30 1 (2008) 21-33
8. Porter A, Cunningham S. Tech mining: exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. John Wiley and Sons; 2005.
9. Brugmann S, Wanner L. Overview of the status of art, deliverable D.8.1. Tech. Rep. PATExpert project, 2006.
10. Iwayama M, Furujii A, Kando N. Overview of classification subtask at NTCIR-5 patent retrieval task. In: NTCIR-5 workshop meeting, 2005.
11. Salton G., and McGill M. Introduction to modern information retrieval (1984), McGraw-Hill Book Company
12. Iwayama M, Fujii A, Kando N, Takano A. Report on the patent retrieval task at NTCIR workshop 3, Tech. Rep., vol. 38, No. 1, ACM SIGIR Forum, 2004.
13. Fujita S. Technology survey and invalidity search: a comparative study of different tasks for Japanese patent document retrieval. Inf Process Manage 2007;43(5):1154-72. doi: .
14. Iwayama M., Fujii A., Kando N., and Marukawa Y. Evaluating patent retrieval in the third NTCIR workshop. Inf Process Manage 42 (2006) 207-221
15. Jarvelin K. Issues and approaches on interactive patent retrieval: evaluation of sessions rather than queries. In: Information retrieval facility, 2007.
16. Wanner L. Patexpert annual report, Tech. Rep., PatExpert, 2007.
17. Hartung L. Management and evaluation of patents and product development projects. IP Score 2.0, Tech. Rep., IP4Inno consortium, 2006.
18. Gibbs A. Application of multiple known determinants to evaluate legal, commercial and technical value of a patent. Tech. Rep., Patent cafe, 2005.
19. Gruber T. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 43 (1995) 907-928
20. Uschold M. Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: Workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing, IJCAI-95, 1995.
21. Gomez-Perez A., Fernandez-Lopez M., and Corcho O. Ontological engineering, advanced information and knowledge processing (2003), Springer
22. Niles I, Pease A. Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS-2001), 2001.
23. Fellbaum C. WordNet an electronic lexical database. MIT press; 1998.
24. Gibbs A. Heuristic Boolean patent search: comparative patent search quality/cost evaluation super Boolean vs. legacy Boolean search engines. Tech. Rep., Patent cafe, 2006.
25. Gibbs A. Semetric: conceptual search and discovery. Tech. Rep., Patent cafe, 2005.
26. Giereth M, Koch S, Kompatsiaris Y, Papadopoulos S, Pianta E, Serafini L, Wanner L. A modular framework for ontology-based representation of patent information. In: JURIX 2007: The 20th anniversary international conference on legal knowledge and information systems, 2007.
27. Ciaramella A. Intellipatent 4.3: a quick overview. Tech. Rep., Intellisemantic s.r.l., 2007.
28. Cascini G. System and method for automatically performing functional analyses of technical texts. European Patent EP1351156, 2002.
29. Cascini G, Fantechi A, Spinicci E. Natural language processing of patents and technical documentation. Doc Anal Syst VI 2004; 3163/2004: 508-20.
30. Stamatis DH. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Am Soc Qual 1995.
31. Jackson P., and Moulinier I. Natural language processing for online applications: text retrieval, extraction and categorization (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company