Using molecular genetic information to infer causality in observational data: Mendelian randomisation

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 39-45

  Taylor, Amy E ^a   Ware, Jennifer J ^a   Gage, Suzanne H ^a   Smith, George Davey ^a   Munafò, Marcus R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; DNA;

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; BEHAVIOR; BLOOD PRESSURE; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA METHYLATION; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; PHENOTYPE; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING; TOBACCO;

EID: 84922597885     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23521546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.08.002     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Liu J.Z., Tozzi F., Waterworth D.M., Pillai S.G., Muglia P., Middleton L., Berrettini W., Knouff C.W., Yuan X., Waeber G., et al. Meta-analysis and imputation refines the association of 15q25 with smoking quantity. Nat Genet 2010, 42:U436-U475.
2. Furberg H., Kim Y., Dackor J., Boerwinkle E., Franceschini N., Ardissino D., Bernardinelli L., Mannucci P., Mauri F. Genome-wide meta-analyses identify multiple loci associated with smoking behavior. Nat Genet 2010, 42:441-447.
3. Thorgeirsson T.E., Gudbjartsson D.F., Surakka I., Vink J.M., Amin N., Geller F., Sulem P., Rafnar T., Esko T., Walter S., et al. Sequence variants at CHRNB3-CHRNA6 and CYP2A6 affect smoking behavior. Nat Genet 2010, 42:448-453.
4. Speliotes E.K., Willer C.J., Berndt S.I., Monda K.L., Thorleifsson G., Jackson A.U., Lango Allen H., Lindgren C.M., Luan J., Magi R., et al. Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index. Nat Genet 2010, 42:937-948.
5. Rietveld C.A., Medland S.E., Derringer J., Yang J., Esko T., Martin N.W., Westra H.J., Shakhbazov K., Abdellaoui A., Agrawal A., et al. GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science 2013, 340:1467-1471.
6. Fowler C.D., Lu Q., Johnson P.M., Marks M.J., Kenny P.J. Habenular alpha5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake. Nature 2011, 471:597-601.
7. Lawlor D.A., Harbord R.M., Sterne J.A., Timpson N., Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med 2008, 27:1133-1163.
8. Tatsioni A., Bonitsis N.G., Ioannidis J.P. Persistence of contradicted claims in the literature. JAMA 2007, 298:2517-2526.
9. Davey Smith G., Ebrahim S. 'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?. Int J Epidemiol 2003, 32:1-22.
10. Davey Smith G., Ebrahim S. What can mendelian randomisation tell us about modifiable behavioural and environmental exposures?. BMJ 2005, 330:1076-1079.
11. Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization for strengthening causal inference in observational studies: application to gene×environment interactions. Perspect Psychol Sci 2010, 5:527-545.
12. Davey Smith G., Lawlor D.A., Harbord R., Timpson N., Day I., Ebrahim S. Clustered environments and randomized genes: a fundamental distinction between conventional and genetic epidemiology. PLoS Med 2007, 4:e352.
13. Zuccolo L., Lewis S.J., Davey Smith G., Sayal K., Draper E.S., Fraser R., Barrow M., Alati R., Ring S., Macleod J., et al. Prenatal alcohol exposure and offspring cognition and school performance. A 'Mendelian randomization' natural experiment. Int J Epidemiol 2013, 42:1358-1370.
14. Lawlor D.A., Nordestgaard B.G., Benn M., Zuccolo L., Tybjaerg-Hansen A., Davey Smith G. Exploring causal associations between alcohol and coronary heart disease risk factors: findings from a Mendelian randomization study in the Copenhagen General Population Study. Eur Heart J 2013, 34:2519-2528.
15. Freathy R.M., Kazeem G.R., Morris R.W., Johnson P.C., Paternoster L., Ebrahim S., Hattersley A.T., Hill A., Hingorani A.D., Holst C., et al. Genetic variation at CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 interacts with smoking status to influence body mass index. Int J Epidemiol 2011, 40:1617-1628.
16. Lewis S.J., Araya R., Davey Smith G., Freathy R., Gunnell D., Palmer T., Munafo M. Smoking is associated with, but does not cause, depressed mood in pregnancy-a mendelian randomization study. PLoS One 2011, 6:e21689.
17. Bjorngaard J.H., Gunnell D., Elvestad M.B., Davey Smith G., Skorpen F., Krokan H., Vatten L., Romundstad P. The causal role of smoking in anxiety and depression: a Mendelian randomization analysis of the HUNT study. Psychol Med 2013, 43:711-719.
18. Tyrrell J., Huikari V., Christie J.T., Cavadino A., Bakker R., Brion M.J., Geller F., Paternoster L., Myhre R., Potter C., et al. Genetic variation in the 15q25 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene cluster (CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4) interacts with maternal self-reported smoking status during pregnancy to influence birth weight. Hum Mol Genet 2012, 21:5344-5358.
19. Davey Smith G., Ebrahim S. Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations. Int J Epidemiol 2004, 33:30-42.
20. Davey Smith G., Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet 2014.
21. Pierce B.L., Burgess S. Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators. Am J Epidemiol 2013, 178:1177-1184.
22. Relton C.L., Davey Smith G. Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: a strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease. Int J Epidemiol 2012, 41:161-176.
23. Vimaleswaran K.S., Berry D.J., Lu C., Tikkanen E., Pilz S., Hiraki L.T., Cooper J.D., Dastani Z., Li R., Houston D.K., et al. Causal relationship between obesity and vitamin D status: bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis of multiple cohorts. PLoS Med 2013, 10:e1001383.
24. Timpson N.J., Nordestgaard B.G., Harbord R.M., Zacho J., Frayling T.M., Tybjaerg-Hansen A., Davey Smith G. C-reactive protein levels and body mass index: elucidating direction of causation through reciprocal Mendelian randomization. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011, 35:300-308.
25. Peng C.H., Jiang Y.Z., Tai A.S., Liu C.B., Peng S.C., Liao C.T., Yen T.C., Hsieh W.P. Causal inference of gene regulation with subnetwork assembly from genetical genomics data. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:2803-2819.
26. Neto E.C., Keller M.P., Attie A.D., Yandell B.S. Causal graphical models in systems genetics: a unified framework for joint inference of causal network and genetic architecture for correlated phenotypes. Ann Appl Stat 2010, 4:320-339.
27. Freeman G., Cowling B.J., Schooling C.M. Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument. Int J Epidemiol 2013, 42:1157-1163.
28. Brion M.J., Shakhbazov K., Visscher P.M. Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol 2013, 42:1497-1501.
29. Burgess S. Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome. Int J Epidemiol 2014, 43:922-929.
30. Lewis S.J. Mendelian randomization as applied to coronary heart disease, including recent advances incorporating new technology. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010, 3:109-117.
31. Taylor A.E., Davies N.M., Ware J.J., Vanderweele T., Davey Smith G., Munafo M.R. Mendelian randomization in health research: using appropriate genetic variants and avoiding biased estimates. Econ Hum Biol 2014, 13:99-106.
32. VanderWeele T.J., Tchetgen Tchetgen E.J., Cornelis M., Kraft P. Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization. Epidemiology 2014, 25:427-435.
33. Munafo M.R., Timofeeva M.N., Morris R.W., Prieto-Merino D., Sattar N., Brennan P., Johnstone E.C., Relton C., Johnson P.C., Walther D., et al. Association between genetic variants on chromosome 15q25 locus and objective measures of tobacco exposure. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012, 104:740-748.
34. Chen L., Davey Smith G., Harbord R.M., Lewis S.J. Alcohol intake and blood pressure: a systematic review implementing a Mendelian randomization approach. PLoS Med 2008, 5:e52.
35. Glymour M.M., Tchetgen E.J., Robins J.M. Credible Mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions. Am J Epidemiol 2012, 175:332-339.
36. Cole S.R., Platt R.W., Schisterman E.F., Chu H., Westreich D., Richardson D., Poole C. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol 2010, 39:417-420.
37. Gage S.H., Davey Smith G., Zammit S., Hickman M., Munafo M.R. Using mendelian randomisation to infer causality in depression and anxiety research. Depress Anxiety 2013, 30:1185-1193.
38. Burgess S., Thompson S.G. Bias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments. Stat Med 2011, 30:1312-1323.
39. Burgess S., Thompson S.G., CRP-CHD-Genetics-Collaboration Bayesian methods for meta-analysis of causal relationships estimated using genetic instrumental variables. Stat Med 2010, 29:1298-1311.
40. Harbord R.M., Didelez V., Palmer T.M., Meng S., Sterne J.A., Sheehan N.A. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies. Stat Med 2013, 32:1246-1258.
41. Thorgeirsson T.E., Geller F., Sulem P., Rafnar T., Wiste A., Magnusson K.P., Manolescu A., Thorleifsson G., Stefansson H., Ingason A., et al. A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature 2008, 452:638-642.
42. Ware J.J., van den Bree M.B., Munafo M.R. Association of the CHRNA5-A3-B4 gene cluster with heaviness of smoking: a meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res 2011, 13:1167-1175.