Acute pancreatitis: Evidence based management guidelines of the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group 2014;Akut pancreatitis. A Magyar Hasnyálmirigy Munkacsoport bizonyítékon alapuló kezelési irányelvei

Orvosi Hetilap

Volumn 156, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 244-261

  Hritz, István ^a   Czakó, László ^b   Dubravcsik, Zsolt ^a   Farkas, Gyula ^b   Kelemen, Dezső ^c   Lásztity, Natália ^d   Morvay, Zita ^b   Oláh, Attila ^e   Pap, Ákos ^f   Párniczky, Andrea ^d   Sahin Tóth, Miklós ^g   Szentkereszti, Zsolt ^h   Szmola, Richárd ⁱ   Szücs, Ákos ^j   Takács, Tamás ^b   Tiszlavicz, László ^b   Hegyi, Péter ^b,k   Munkacsoport, Magyar Hasnyálmirigy ^l  

^a Bács Kiskun Megyei Önkormányzat Hospital   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^d Fovarosi Heim Pal Gyermekkórház Rendelointézet Haematológiai   (Hungary)

^e Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház Sebészeti Centrum   (Hungary)

^f Peterfy Sandor Utcai Korhaz   (Hungary)

^g BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

ⁱ NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Hungary)

^j SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^k UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^l Szegedi Tudom?nyegyetem Altalanos Orvostudomanyi Kar Borgyogyaszati Es Allergologiai Klinika Szeged Koranyi Fasor 6 6720   (Hungary)

more..

Author keywords

acute pancreatitis; evidence based medicine; guideline

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEMORRHAGIC PANCREATITIS; ACUTE PANCREATITIS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONSENSUS; CONSULTATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMAN; HUNGARY; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INTENSIVE CARE; NUTRITION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; PROPHYLAXIS; REVIEW; TREATMENT INDICATION; ACUTE DISEASE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPLICATION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; INTRA-ABDOMINAL HYPERTENSION; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATITIS, ACUTE NECROTIZING; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ACUTE DISEASE; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; HUNGARY; INTENSIVE CARE; INTRA-ABDOMINAL HYPERTENSION; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATITIS, ACUTE NECROTIZING; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC;

EID: 84922534151     PISSN: 00306002     EISSN: 17886120     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/OH.2015.30059     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Yadav, D., Lowenfels, A. B.: The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144(6), 1252-1261.
2. Banks, P. A., Bollen, T. L., Dervenis, C., et al.: Classifi cation of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classifi cation and defi nitions by international consensus. Gut, 2013, 62(1), 102-111.
3. Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines: IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 2013, 13(4 Suppl. 2), e1-e15.
4. Tenner, S., Baillie, J., DeWitt, J., et al.: American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2013, 108(9), 1400-1415.
5. Chang, K., Lu, W., Zhang, K., et al.: Rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 test in the early diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Clin. Biochem., 2012, 45(13-14), 1051-1056.
6. Liu, C. L., Fan, S. T., Lo, C. M., et al.: Clinico-biochemical prediction of biliary cause of acute pancreatitis in the era of endoscopic ultrasonography. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 2005, 22(5), 423-431.
7. Wilcox, C. M., Varadarajulu, S., Eloubeidi, M.: Role of endoscopic evaluation in idiopathic pancreatitis: a systematic review. Gastrointest. Endosc., 2006, 63(7), 1037-1045.
8. Whitcomb, D. C., Gorry, M. C., Preston, R. A., et al.: Hereditary pancreatitis is caused by a mutation in the cationic trypsinogen gene. Nat. Genet., 1996, 14(2), 141-145.
9. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus conference: defi nitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit. Care Med., 1992, 20(6), 864-874.
10. Johnson, C. D., Abu-Hilal, M.: Persistent organ failure during the fi rst week as a marker of fatal outcome in acute pancreatitis. Gut, 2004, 53(9), 1340-1344.
11. Mofidi, R., Duff, M. D., Wigmore, S. J., et al.: Association between early systemic infl ammatory response, severity of multiorgan dysfunction and death in acute pancreatitis. Br. J. Surg., 2006, 93(6), 738-744.
12. Papachristou, G. I., Muddana, V., Yadav, D., et al.: Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2010, 105(2), 435-441.
13. Bollen, T. L., Singh, V. K., Maurer, R., et al.: A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2012, 107(4), 612-619.
14. Balthazar, E. J., Robinson, D. L., Megibow, A. J., et al.: Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology, 1990, 174(2), 331-336.
15. Morgan, D. E., Baron, T. H., Smith, J. K., et al.: Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology, 1997, 203(3), 773-778.
16. Wu, B. U., Hwang, J. Q., Gardner, T. H., et al.: Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic infl ammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 2011, 9(8), 710-717e1.
17. Perner, A., Haase, N., Guttormsen, A. B., et al.: Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med., 2012, 367(2), 124-134.
18. Mao, E. Q., Tang, Y. Q., Fei, J., et al.: Fluid therapy for severe acute pancreatitis in acute response stage. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), 2009, 122(2), 169-173.
19. Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit. Care Med., 1999, 27(3), 633-638.
20. Singla, A., Simons, J., Li, Y., et al.: Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology, 2009, 137(6), 1995-2001.
21. Gardner, T. B., Vege, S. S., Pearson, R. K., et al.: Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 2008, 6(10), 1070-1076.
22. Al-Omran, M., Albalawi, Z. H., Tashkandi, M. F., et al.: Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2010, (1), CD002837.
23. Kirkpatrick, A. W., Roberts, D. J., De Waele, J., et al.: Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus defi nitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med., 2013, 39(7), 1190-1206.
24. Wittau, M., Mayer, B., Scheele, J., et al.: Systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 2011, 46(3), 261-270.
25. Luiten, E. J., Hop, W. C., Lange, J. F., et al.: Controlled clinical trial of selective decontamination for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Ann. Surg., 1995, 222(1), 57-65.
26. Besselink, M. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Buskens, E., et al.: Probiotic prophylaxis in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2008, 371(9613), 651-659.
27. Eckerwall, G. E., Tingstedt, B. B., Bergenzaun, P. E., et al.: Immediate oral feeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis is safe and may accelerate recovery-a randomized clinical study. Clin. Nutr., 2007, 26(6), 758-763.
28. Teich, N., Aghdassi, A., Fischer, J., et al.: Optimal timing of oral refeeding in mild acute pancreatitis: results of an open randomized multicenter trial. Pancreas, 2010, 39(7), 1088-1092.
29. Petrov, M. S., van Santvoort, H. C., Besselink, M. G., et al.: Enteral nutrition and the risk of mortality and infectious complications in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch. Surg., 2008, 143(11), 1111-1117.
30. Sun, J. K., Mu, X. W., Li, W. Q., et al.: Effects of early enteral nutrition on immune function of severe acute pancreatitis patients. World J. Gastroenterol., 2013, 19(6), 917-922.
31. Petrov, M. S., Loveday, B. P., Pylypchuk, R. D., et al.: Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis. Br. J. Surg., 2009, 96(11), 1243-1252.
32. Eatock, F. C., Chong, P., Menezes, N., et al.: A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2005, 100(2), 432-439.
33. Kumar, A., Singh, N., Prakash, S., et al.: Early enteral nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nasojejunal and nasogastric routes. J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 2006, 40(5), 431-434.
34. Mirtallo, J. M., Forbes, A., McClave, S. A., et al.: International consensus guidelines for nutrition therapy in pancreatitis. J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr., 2012, 36(3), 284-291.
35. Tse, F., Yuan, Y.: Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2012, (5), CD009779.
36. Liu, C. L., Fan, S. T., Lo, C. M., et al.: Comparison of early endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 2005, 3(12), 1238-1244.
37. Kondo, S., Isayama, H., Akahane, M., et al.: Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helicalcomputed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur. J. Radiol., 2005, 54(2), 271-275.
38. Dumonceau, J. M., Andriulli, A., Elmunzer, B. J., et al.: Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline-Updated June 2014. Endoscopy, 2014, 46(9), 799-815.
39. Dumonceau, J. M., Andriulli, A., Deviere, J., et al.: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy, 2010, 42(6), 503-515.
40. Artifon, E. L., Chu, A., Freeman, M., et al.: A comparison of the consensus and clinical defi nitions of pancreatitis with a proposal to redefi ne post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreas, 2010, 39(4), 530-535.
41. Dai, H. F., Wang, X. W., Zhao, K.: Role of nonsteroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int., 2009, 8(1), 11-16.
42. Elmunzer, B. J., Waljee, A. K., Elta, G. H., et al.: A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut, 2008, 57(9), 1262-1267.
43. Zheng, M. H., Xia, H. H., Chen, Y. P.: Rectal administration of NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a complementary meta-analysis. Gut, 2008, 57(11), 1632-1633.
44. Adler, D. G., Chari, S. T., Dahl, T. J., et al.: Conservative management of infected necrosis complicating severe acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2003, 98(1), 98-103.
45. Rau, B., Pralle, U., Mayer, J. M., et al.: Role of ultrasonographically guided fi ne-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis. Br. J. Surg., 1998, 85(2), 179-184.
46. Van Santvoort, H. C., Bakker, O. J., Bollen, T. L., et al.: A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. Gastroenterology, 2011, 141(4), 1254-1263.
47. Beck, W. C., Bhutani, M. S., Raju, G. S., et al: Surgical management of late sequelae in survivors of an episode of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 2012, 214(4), 682-688.
48. Besselink, M. G., Verwer, T. J., Schoenmaeckers, E. J., et al.: Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch. Surg., 2007, 142(12), 1194-1201.
49. Van Santvoort, H. C., Besselink, M. G., Bakker, O. J., et al.: A stepup approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N. Engl. J. Med., 2010, 362(16), 1491-1502.
50. Bakker, O. J., van Santvoort, H. C., van Brunschot, S., et al.: Endoscopic transgastric vs. surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2012, 307(10), 1053-1061.
51. Van Baal, M. C., Besselink, M. G., Bakker, O. J., et al.: Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Ann. Surg., 2012, 255(5), 860-866.
52. McAlister, V. C., Davenport, E., Renouf, E.: Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2007, (4), CD006233.
53. Nealon, W. H., Bawduniak, J., Walser, E. M.: Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections. Ann. Surg., 2004, 239(6), 741-749.
54. Heider, T. R., Brown, A., Grimm, I. S., et al.: Endoscopic sphincterotomy permits interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe gallstone pancreatitis. J. Gastrointest. Surg., 2006, 10(1), 1-5.