Robotic vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1399-1411

  Tang, K ^a   Xia, D ^a   Li, H ^a   Guan, W ^a   Guo, X ^a   Hu, Z ^a   Ma, X ^b   Zhang, X ^b   Xu, H ^a   Ye, Z ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Bladder cancer; Meta analysis; Open; Radical cystectomy; Robotic assisted

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; BLADDER CANCER; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CYSTECTOMY; DIET; FISTULA; HUMAN; ILEAL CONDUIT; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT HISTORY OF SURGERY; PATIENT HISTORY OF THERAPY; PNEUMONIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; REVIEW; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEPSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; URETER OBSTRUCTION; WOUND INFECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; UTILIZATION;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CYSTECTOMY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; OPERATIVE TIME; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84922481250     PISSN: 07487983     EISSN: 15322157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.008     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet 2009;18:239-49.
2. Thalmann GN, Stein JP. Outcomes of radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2008;102:1279-88.
3. Dinney CP. Therapy of invasive bladder cancer. Urology 2006;67:56-9.
4. Borden Jr LS, Clark PE, Hall MC. Bladder cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2005;17:275-80.
5. Herr HW, Dotan Z, Donat SM, et al. Defining optimal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 2007;177:437.
6. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1, 054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:666-75.
7. Huang GJ, Stein JP. Open radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy remains the treatment of choice for invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:369-75.
8. Challacombe BJ, Bochner BH, Dasgupta P, et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications. Eur Urol 2011;60:767-75.
9. Davis JW, Castle EP, Pruthi RS, Ornstein DK, Guru KA. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: an expert panel review of the current status and future direction. Urol Oncol 2010;28:480-6.
10. Chang SS, Smith JA, Wells N, Peterson M, Kovach B, Cookson MS. Estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements of radical cystectomy. J Urol 2001;166:2151-4.
11. Quek ML, Stein JP, Daneshmand S. A critical analysis of perioperative mortality from radical cystectomy. J Urol 2006;175:886-9.
12. Cathelineau X, Arroyo C, Rozet F, et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the Montsouris experience after 84 cases. Eur Urol 2005;47:780-4.
13. Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: our experience in a consecutive series of 10 patients with a 3 years follow-up. Eur Urol 2005;47:785-90.
14. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological follow up: a single surgeon experience. J Urol 2007;178:2340-3.
15. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003;92:232-6.
16. Shah NL, Hemal AK, Menon M. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Curr Urol Rep 2005;6:122-5.
17. Hemal AK, Menon M. Robotics in urology. Curr Opin Urol 2004;14:89-93.
18. Balaji KC, Yohannes P, McBride CL, et al. Feasibility of robotassisted totally intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal conduit urinary diversion: initial results of a single institutional pilot study. Urology 2004;63:51-5.
19. Galich A, Sterrett S, Nazemi T, et al. Comparative analysis of early perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy by either the robotic or open method. JSLS 2006;10:145-50.
20. Gondo T, Yoshioka K, Nakagami Y, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative and pathologic outcomes in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2012;42:625-31.
21. Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, et al. A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Pract 2012;66:618-9.
22. Knox ML, El-Galley R, Busby JE. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: identification of patients who benefit from the robotic approach. J Endourol 2012;26:1-12.
23. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 2011;77:621-5.
24. Nepple KG, Strope SA, Grubb 3rd RL, Kibel AS. Early oncologic outcomes of robotic vs. open radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer. Urol Oncol 2013;31:894-8.
25. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM, et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:274-82.
26. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 2010;57:196-201.
27. Rhee JJ, Lebeau S, Smolkin M, Theodorescu D. Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance. BJU Int 2006;98:1059-63.
28. Richards KA, Hemal AK, Kader AK, Pettus JA. Robot assisted laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy at the time of radical cystectomy rivals that of open surgery: single institution report. Urology 2010;76:1400-4.
29. Sterrett S, Mammen T, Nazemi T, et al. Major urological oncological surgeries can be performed using minimally invasive robotic or laparoscopic methods with similar early perioperative outcomes compared to conventional open methods. World J Urol 2007;25:193-8.
30. Styn NR, Montgomery JS, Wood DP, et al. Matched comparison of robotic assisted and open radical cystectomy. Urology 2012;79:1303-8.
31. Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. BJU Int 2008;101:89-93.
32. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Web site: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025 [accessed 26.04.12].
33. Clark HD, Wells GA, Huët C, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trials 1999;20:448-52.
34. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularization on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001;358:870-5.
35. Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Web site: http://www.ohri. ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.asp [accessed 15.03.12].
36. Clarke M, Horton R. Bringing it all together: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet 2001;357:1728.
37. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13.
38. Pruthi RS, Smith A, Wallen EM. Evaluating the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. J Endourol 2008;22:2469-74.
39. Buscarini M, Josephson DY, Stein JP. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: a review. Urol Int 2007;79:191-9.
40. Donat SM. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 2007;69:221-5.