Natural variation in stomatal response to closing stimuli among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions after exposure to low VPD as a tool to recognize the mechanism of disturbed stomatal functioning

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 65, Issue 22, 2014, Pages 6529-6542

  Aliniaeifard, Sasan ^a,b   Van Meeteren, Uulke ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

abscisic acid; Arabidopsis thaliana; desiccation.; natural variation; stomata; vapour pressure deficit (VPD)

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

ABSCISIC ACID; PHOTOSYSTEM II; WATER;

ARABIDOPSIS; DESICCATION; ECOTYPE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYSTEM II; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT STOMA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; VAPOR PRESSURE;

ABSCISIC ACID; ARABIDOPSIS; DESICCATION; ECOTYPE; GENETIC VARIATION; GEOGRAPHY; PHOTOSYSTEM II PROTEIN COMPLEX; PHYLOGENY; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; VAPOR PRESSURE; WATER;

EID: 84922473862     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru370     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aliniaeifard S, Malcolm Matamoros P, Van Meeteren U. 2014. Stomatal malfunctioning under low vapour pressure deficit (VPD) conditions: Induced by morphological and anatomical or by signalling alterations? Physiologia Plantarum . doi:10.1111/ppl.12216
2. Aliniaeifard S, Van Meeteren U. 2013. Can prolonged exposure to low VPD disturb the ABA signalling in stomatal guard cells? Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 3551-3566
3. Alonso-Blanco C, Aarts MGM, Bentsink L, Keurentjes JJB, Reymond M, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef M. 2009. What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? The Plant Cell 21, 1877-1896
4. Appleby RF, Davies WJ. 1983. A possible evaporation site in the guard cell wall and the influence of leaf structure on the humidity response by stomata of woody plants. Oecologia 56, 30-40
5. Arve LE, Terfa MT, Gislerd HR, Olsen JE, Torre S. 2012. High relative air humidity and continuous light reduce stomata functionality by affecting the ABA regulation in rose leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 36, 382-392
6. Assmann S, Gershenson A. 1991. The kinetics of stomatal responses to VPD in Vicia faba: electrophysiological and water relations models. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 455-465
7. Assmann SM, Snyder JA, Lee YRJ. 2000. ABA-deficient (aba1) and ABA-insensitive (abi1-1, abi2-1) mutants of Arabidopsis have a wild-type stomatal response to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 387-395
8. Athanasiou K, Dyson BC, Webster RE, Johnson GN. 2010. Dynamic acclimation of photosynthesis increases plant fitness in changing environments. Plant Physiology 152, 366-373
9. Bauerle WL, Whitlow TH, Setter TL, Vermeylen FM. 2004. Abscisic acid synthesis in Acer rubrum L. Leaves-A vapor-pressure-deficitmediated response. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 129, 182-187
10. Bouchabke O, Chang F, Simon M, Voisin R, Pelletier G, Durand-Tardif M. 2008. Natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana as a tool for highlighting differential drought responses. PLoS ONE 3, e1705
11. Boyes DC, Zayed AM, Ascenzi R, McCaskill AJ, Hoffman NE, Davis KR, Grlach J. 2001. Growth stage-based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis a model for high throughput functional genomics in plants. The Plant Cell 13, 1499-1510
12. Brosch M, Merilo EBE, Mayer F, Pechter P, Puzrjova I, Brader G, Kangasjrvi J, Kollist H. 2010. Natural variation in ozone sensitivity among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and its relation to stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell and Environment 33, 914-925
13. Buckley TN. 2005. The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytologist 168, 275-292
14. Bunce JA. 1997. Does transpiration control stomatal responses to water vapour pressure deficit? Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 131-135
15. Bunce JA. 1998. Effects of humidity on short-term responses of stomatal conductance to an increase in carbon dioxide concentration. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 115-120
16. Delgado D, Alonso-Blanco C, Fenoll C, Mena M. 2011. Natural variation in stomatal abundance of Arabidopsis thaliana includes cryptic diversity for different developmental processes. Annals of Botany 107, 1247-1258
17. Edwards KD, Anderson PE, Hall A, Salathia NS, Locke JCW, Lynn JR, Straume M, Smith JQ, Millar AJ. 2006. FLOWERING LOCUS C mediates natural variation in the high-temperature response of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. The Plant Cell 18, 639-650
18. Fanourakis D, Carvalho SMP, Almeida DPF, Heuvelink E. 2011. Avoiding high relative air humidity during critical stages of leaf ontogeny is decisive for stomatal functioning. Physiologia Plantarum 142, 274-286
19. Fanourakis D, Heuvelink E, Carvalho SMP. 2013. A comprehensive analysis of the physiological and anatomical components involved in higher water loss rates after leaf development at high humidity. Journal of Plant Physiology 170, 890-898
20. Farquhar GD. 1978. Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5, 787-800
21. Fordham MC, Harrison-Murray RS, Knight L, Clay CM. 2001a. Decline in stomatal response to leaf water deficit in Corylus maxima cuttings. Tree Physiology 21, 489-496
22. Fordham MC, Harrison-Murray RS, Knight L, Evered CE. 2001b. Effects of leaf wetting and high humidity on stomatal function in leafy cuttings and intact plants of Corylus maxima. Physiologia Plantarum 113, 233-240
23. Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. 1997. The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: Information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 142-145
24. Giday H, Fanourakis D, Kjaer KH, Fomsgaard IS, Ottosen C-O. 2013. Foliar abscisic acid content underlies genotypic variation in stomatal responsiveness after growth at high relative air humidity. Annals of Botany 112, 1857-1867
25. Grantz D. 1990. Plant response to atmospheric humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 13, 667-679
26. Hannah MA, Wiese D, Freund S, Fiehn O, Heyer AG, Hincha DK. 2006. Natural genetic variation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 142, 98-112
27. Holbrook NM, Shashidhar V, James RA, Munns R. 2002. Stomatal control in tomato with ABA-deficient roots: response of grafted plants to soil drying. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1503-1514
28. Jung H-S, Niyogi KK. 2009. Quantitative genetic analysis of thermal dissipation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 150, 977-986
29. Katori T, Ikeda A, Iuchi S, Kobayashi M, Shinozaki K, Maehashi K, Sakata Y, Tanaka S, Taji T. 2010. Dissecting the genetic control of natural variation in salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 1125-1138
30. Kushiro T, Okamoto M, Nakabayashi K, Yamagishi K, Kitamura S, Asami T, Hirai N, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Nambara E. 2004. The Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP707A encodes ABA 8-hydroxylases: key enzymes in ABA catabolism. The EMBO Journal 23, 1647-1656
31. Larque-Saavedra A, Wain RL. 1974. Abscisic acid levels in relation to drought tolerance in varieties of Zea mays L. Nature 251, 716-717
32. Lpez-Rez JA, Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Mulder P, Undas AK, Sergeant MJ, Verstappen F, Bugg TD, Thompson AJ, Ruyter-Spira C. 2010. Does abscisic acid affect strigolactone biosynthesis? New Phytologist 187, 343-354
33. Luan S. 2002. Signalling drought in guard cells. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 229-237
34. Mills G, Hayes F, Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 2009. Chronic exposure to increasing background ozone impairs stomatal functioning in grassland species. Global Change Biology 15, 1522-1533
35. Mott KA, Parkhurst DF. 1991. Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 509-515
36. Mott KA, Peak D. 2013. Testing a vapour-phase model of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 36, 936-944
37. Munns R, King RW. 1988. Abscisic acid is not the only stomatal inhibitor in the transpiration stream of wheat plants. Plant Physiology 88, 703-708
38. Okamoto M, Tanaka Y, Abrams SR, Kamiya Y, Seki M, Nambara E. 2009. High humidity induces abscisic acid 8-hydroxylase in stomata and vasculature to regulate local and systemic abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149, 825-834
39. Outlaw WH, De Vlieghere-He X. 2001. Transpiration rate. An important factor controlling the sucrose content of the guard cell apoplast of broad bean. Plant Physiology 126, 1716-1724
40. Pantin F, Monnet F, Jannaud D, Costa JM, Renaud J, Muller B, Simonneau T, Genty B. 2013. The dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata. New Phytologist 197, 65-72
41. Paoletti E. 2005. Ozone slows stomatal response to light and leaf wounding in a Mediterranean evergreen broadleaf, Arbutus unedo. Environmental Pollution 134, 439-445
42. Peak D, Mott KA. 2011. A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment 34, 162-178
43. Raschke K. 1970. Leaf hydraulic system: rapid epidermal and stomatal responses to changes in water supply. Science 167, 189-191
44. Rezaei Nejad A, Harbinson J, Van Meeteren U. 2006. Dynamics of spatial heterogeneity of stomatal closure in Tradescantia virginiana altered by growth at high relative air humidity. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 3669-3678
45. Rezaei Nejad A, Van Meeteren U. 2008. Dynamics of adaptation of stomatal behaviour to moderate or high relative air humidity in Tradescantia virginiana. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 289-301
46. Rezaei Nejad A, Van Meeteren U. 2007. The role of abscisic acid in disturbed stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana during growth at high relative air humidity. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 627-636
47. Rezaei Nejad A, Van Meeteren U. 2005. Stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana grown at high relative air humidity. Physiologia Plantarum 125, 324-332
48. Saliendra N, Sperry J, Comstock J. 1995. Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta 196, 357-366
49. Shindo C, Bernasconi G, Hardtke CS. 2007. Natural genetic variation in Arabidopsis: tools, traits and prospects for evolutionary ecology. Annals of Botany 99, 1043-1054
50. Shope JC, Peak D, Mott KA. 2008. Stomatal responses to humidity in isolated epidermes. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 1290-1298
51. Slavik B. 1974. Methods of studying plant water relations . London: Chapman and Hall. 121-156
52. Tardieu F, Simonneau T. 1998. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 419-432
53. Trontin C, Tisn S, Bach L, Loudet O. 2011. What does Arabidopsis natural variation teach us (and does not teach us) about adaptation in plants? Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14, 225-231
54. Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 2009. Ozone suppresses soil drying-And abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure via an ethylene-dependent mechanism. Plant, Cell and Environment 32, 949-959
55. Zhang J, Davies WJ. 1991. Antitranspirant activity in xylem sap of maize plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 317-321