Dynamics of spatial heterogeneity of stomatal closure in Tradescantia virginiana altered by growth at high relative air humidity

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 57, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 3669-3678

  Rezaei Nejad, Abdolhossein ^a,b   Harbinson, Jeremy ^a   Van Meeteren, Uulke ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LORESTAN UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Desiccation; Patchiness; PSII effIciency; Relative water content; Stomata; Water potential

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; CHLOROPHYLL; FLUORESCENCE; GROWTH KINETICS; IMAGING SYSTEMS;

DESICCATION; PATCHINESS; PSII EFFICIENCY; RELATIVE WATER CONTENT; STOMATA; WATER POTENTIAL;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

WATER;

ARTICLE; DESICCATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMIDITY; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYSTEM II; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; TRADESCANTIA;

DESICCATION; HUMIDITY; PHOTOSYSTEM II PROTEIN COMPLEX; PLANT LEAVES; TRADESCANTIA; WATER;

TRADESCANTIA; TRADESCANTIA VIRGINIANA;

EID: 33845270122     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl114     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ackerson RC. 1980. Stomatal response of cotton to water stress and abscisic acid as affected by water stress history. Plant Physiology 65, 455-459.
2. Assmann SM. 1993. Signal transduction in guard cells. Annual Review of Cell Biology 9, 345-375.
3. Beyschlag W, Eckstien J. 2001. Towards a causal analysis of stomatal patchiness: the role of stomatal size variability and hydrological heterogeneity. Acta Oecologica 22, 161-173.
4. Beyschlag W, Pfanz H. 1990. A fast method to detect the occurrence of nonhomogenous distribution of stomatal aperture in heterobaric plant leaves. Oecologia 82, 52-55.
5. Brown KW, Jordan WR, Thomas JC. 1976. Water stress induced alterations of the stomatal response to decreases in leaf water potential. Physiologia Plantarum 37, 1-5.
6. Cornic G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science 5, 187-188.
7. Cornic G, Massacci A. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker NR, ed. Advances in photosynthesis: photosynthesis and the environment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 347-366.
8. Cutler JM, Rains DW, Loomis RS. 1977. The importance of cell size in the water relations of plants. Physiologia Plantarum 40, 255-260.
9. Daley PF, Raschke K, Ball JT, Berry JA. 1989. Topography of photosynthetic activity of leaves obtained from images of chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiology 90, 1233-1238.
10. Downton WJS, Loveys BR, Grant WJR. 1988. Stomatal closure fully accounts for the inhibition of photosynthesis by abscisic acid. New Phytologist 108, 263-266.
11. During H. 1992. Low air humidity causes non-uniform stomatal closure in heterobaric leaves in Vitis species. Vitis 31, 1-7.
12. Eckstien J, Beyschlag W, Mott KA. 1996. Changes in photon flux can induce stomatal patchiness. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 1066-1075.
13. Fordham MC, Harrison-Murray RS, Knight L, Evered CE. 2001. Effects of leaf wetting and high humidity on stomatal function in leafy cuttings and intact plants of Corylus maxima. Physiologia Plantarum 113, 233-240.
14. Franks PJ, Farquhar GD. 2001. The effect of exogenous abscisic acid on stomatal development, stomatal mechanics and leaf gas exchange in Tradescantia virginiana. Plant Physiology 125, 935-942.
15. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990, 87-92.
16. Genty B, Harbinson J, Baker NR. 1990. Relative quantum efficiencies of photosystem I and II of leaves in photorespiratory and non-photorespiratory conditions. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 28, 1-10.
17. Harbinson J, van Meeteren U, van Rensen R. 2005. The use of imaging of the efficiency of photosystem II electron transport to visualise the effect of dry storage on the photosynthesis and stomatal closure of cut rose stems. Acta Horticulturae 669, 57-69.
18. Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424, 901-908.
19. Kearns EV, Assmann SM. 1993. The guard cell-environment connection. Plant Physiology 102, 711-715.
20. Leung J, Giraudat J. 1998. Abscisic acid signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 49, 199-222.
21. Lichtenthaler HK, Babani F. 2000. Detection of photosynthetic activity and water stress by imaging the red chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 38, 889-895.
22. Lu C, Zhang J. 1998. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition in wheat plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 883-892.
23. Maxwell K, Johnson GN. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 659-668.
24. i) on Rosa rubiginosa leaves fed with abscisic acid by using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiology 116, 947-957.
25. 2 diffusion. Planta 210, 126-131.
26. 2 in leaves is not sufficient to support photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 139, 254-266.
27. Mott AM, Buckley TN. 2000. Patchy stomatal conductance: emergent collective behaviour of stomata. Trends in Plant Science 5, 258-262.
28. Mott KA, Cardon ZG, Berry JA. 1993. Asymmetric patchy stomatal closure for the two surfaces of Xanthium strumarium L. leaves at low humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 25-34.
29. Rezaei Nejad A, van Meeteren U. 2005. Stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana grown at high relative air humidity. Physiologia Plantarum 125, 324-232.
30. 2, light and water potential, but fail to close fully. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 99-107.
31. Smith S, Weyers JDB, Berry WG. 1989. Variation in stomatal characteristics over the lower surface of Commelina communis leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 12, 653-659.
32. Tardieu F, Lafarge T, Simonneau TH. 1996. Stomatal control by fed or endogenous xylem ABA in sunflower: interpretation of correlations between leaf water potential and stomatal conductance in anisohydric species. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 75-84.
33. Torre S, Fjeld T. 2001. Water loss and postharvest characteristics of cut roses grown at high or moderate relative air humidity. Scientia Horticulturae 89, 217-226.
34. Torre S, Fjeld T, Gislerød HR, Moe R. 2003. Leaf anatomy and stomatal morphology of greenhouse roses grown at moderate or high air humidity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128, 598-602.
35. Trejo CL, Clephan AL, Davies WJ. 1995. How do stomata read abscisic acid signals? Plant Physiology 109, 803-811.
36. Weyers JDB, Meidner H. 1990. Methods in stomatal research. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical, 129-155.
37. Ziv M, Schwartz A, Fleminger D. 1987. Malfunctioning stomata in vitreous leaves of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) plants propagated in vitro: implication for hardening. Plant Science 52, 127-134.