Short scales - Five misunderstandings andways to overcome them

Journal of Individual Differences

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 185-189

  Ziegler, Matthias ^a   Kemper, Christoph J ^b   Kruyen, Peter ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Institute for Medical and Pharmaceutical Proficiency Assessment   (Germany)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922461069     PISSN: 16140001     EISSN: 21512299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000148     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Antunes, B., Murtagh, F., Bausewein, C., Harding, R., & Higginson, I. J. (in press). Screening for depression in advanced disease: Psychometric properties, sensitivity and specificity of two items of the palliative care outcome scale (POS). Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.014.
2. American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Beauducel, A., & Leue, A. (2014). Testing the assumption of uncorrelated errors for short scales by means of structural equation modeling. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 201-211. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000135.
4. Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874-888. doi: 10.1037/a0027403.
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418. doi: 10.1177/0013164404266386.
6. Emons, W. H., Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12, 105.
7. Haig, B. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10, 371-388.
8. Heckman, J. J. (2011). The Economics of Inequality: The value of early childhood education. American Educator, 35, 31.
9. Heene, M., Bollmann, S., & Bühner, M. (2014). Much ado about nothing, or much to do about something? Effects of scale shortening on criterion validity and mean differences. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 245-249. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000146.
10. Kemper, C. J., Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2013). Entwicklung und Validierung einer ultrakurzen Operationalisierung des Konstrukts Optimismus- Pessimismus [Development and validation of an ultrashort measure for the construct of optimism-pessimism-The Scale Optimism-Pessimism-2 (SOP2)]. Diagnostica, 59, 119-129.
11. Kemper, C. J., Brähler, E., & Zenger, M. (2013). Psychologische und sozialwissenschaftliche Kurzskalen für Wissenschaft und Praxis - Eine Einführung [Short Scales from Psychology and Social Sciences - An introduction]. In C. J. Kemper, E. Brähler, & I. Zenger (Eds.), Psychologische und sozialwissenschaftliche Kurzskalen (pp. 1-7). Berlin:MWV Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft.
12. Kruyen, P. M. (2012). Making decisions about individuals using tests and questionnaires: When is short too short? Dissertation, Ridderkerk, The Netherlands.
13. Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H., & Sijtsma, K. (2012). Test length and decision quality in personnel selection: When is short too short? International Journal of Testing, 12, 321-344.
14. Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H., & Sijtsma, K. (2013a). On the shortcomings of shortened tests: A literature review. International Journal of Testing, 13, 223-248.
15. Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H., & Sijtsma, K. (2013b). Shortening the S-STAI: Consequences for research and clinical practice. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 75, 167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.013.
16. Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H., & Sijtsma, K. (2014). Assessing individual change using short tests and questionnaires. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 201-216. doi: 10.1177/0146621613510061.
17. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161.
18. Lämmle, L., Ziegler, M., Seidel, I., Worth, A., & Bös, K. (2012). Four classes of physical fitness in German children and adolescents: Only differences in performance or at-risk groups? International Journal of Public Health, 58, 187-196.
19. Lindqvist, E., & Vestman, R. (2011). The Labor Market Returns to Cognitive and Noncognitive Ability: Evidence from the Swedish Enlistment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 101-128. doi: 10.1257/app.3.1.101.
20. McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28-50. doi: 10.1177/1088868310366253.
21. Oshio, A., Abe, S., Cutrone, P., & Gosling, S. D. (2014). Further validity of the Japanese version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J): Cross-language evidence for content validity. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 236-244. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000145.
22. Rammstedt, B., & Beierlein, C. (2014). Can't we make it any shorter? The limits of personality assessment and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 212-220. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000141.
23. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
24. Sandy, C. J., Gosling, S. D., & Koelkebeck, T. (2014). Psychometric comparison of automated vs. rational methods of scale abbreviation: An illustration using a brief measure of values. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 221-235. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000144.
25. Schipolowski, S., Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2014). Pitfalls and challenges in constructing short forms of cognitive ability measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 190-200. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000134.
26. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107-120.
27. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102.
28. Thalmayer, A. G., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, 995-1009. doi: 10.1037/a0024165.
29. Ziegler, M., Kemper, C., & Rammstedt, B. (2013). The Vocabulary and Overclaiming Test (VOC-T). Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 32-40.
30. Ziegler, M., Poropat, A., & Mell, J. (2014). Does the length of a questionnaire matter? Expected and unexpected answers from generalizability theory. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 250-261. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000147.
31. Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach's a, Revelle's b, and McDonald's x H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123-133.