Do high-fidelity training models translate into better skill acquisition for an endourologist?

Current Opinion in Urology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 143-152

  Cloutier, Jonathan ^a,b   Traxer, Olivier ^a  

^a HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

High fidelity; low fidelity; simulator; training; ureteroscopy; validity

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC MODEL; ANIMAL MODEL; CADAVER; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DISEASE SIMULATION; ENDOUROLOGY; FIDELITY; HIGH FIDELITY MODEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOW FIDELITY MODEL; MEDICAL STUDENT; NONHUMAN; OPERATING ROOM; PERSONALITY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TRAINING; URETEROSCOPY; UROLOGIST; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; CYSTOSCOPY; EDUCATION; ENDOSCOPY; UROLOGIC SURGERY; UROLOGY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; CYSTOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; URETEROSCOPY; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UROLOGY;

EID: 84922416758     PISSN: 09630643     EISSN: 14736586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000143     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Carter BN. The fruition of Halsted's concept of surgical training. Surgery 1952; 32:518-527.
2. Meier AH, Rawn CL, Krummel TM. Virtual reality: surgical application: challenge for the new millennium. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192:372-384.
3. Brunckhorst O, Aydin A, Abboudi H, et al. Simulation-based ureteroscopy training: a systematic review. J Surg Educ 2015; 72:135-143.
4. Viberg N, Forsberg BC, Borowitz M, Molin R. International comparisons of waiting times in healthcare-limitations and prospects. Health Policy 2013; 112:53-61.
5. The waiting time alliance (WTA). Canadians still waiting too long for healthcare. June 2013. http://www.gov.nl.ca/HaveYouHeard/wta.pdf.
6. Nuland SB. Mistakes in the operating room: error and responsibility. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1281-1283.
7. Reznick R, Macrae H. Changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2664-2669.
8. Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1967.
9. Kopta JA. The development of motor skills in orthopaedic education. Clin Orthop 1971; 75:80-85.
10. Ganesamoni R, Mishra S, Kumar A, et al. Role of active mentoring during flexible ureteroscopy training. J Endourol 2012; 26:1346-1349.
11. Wong JA, Matsumoto ED. Primer: cognitive motor learning for teaching surgical skill-how are you surgical skills taught and assessed? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008; 5:47-54.
12. Wignall GR, Denstedt JD, Preminger GM, et al. Surgical simulation: a urological perspective. J Urol 2008; 179:1690-1699.
13. Matsumoto ED. Low-fidelity ureteroscopy models. J Endourol 2007; 21:248-251.
14. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 2002; 167:1243-1247.
15. Traxer O. French association annual meeting presentation of the new K-BOX training device. 2014.
16. Schout BM, Hendrikx AJ, Scherpbier AJ, et al. Update on training models in endourology: a qualitative systematic review of the literature between January 1980 and April 2008. Eur Urol 2008; 54:1247-1261.
17. Olweny E, Pearle M. Update on resident training models for ureteroscopy. Curr Urol Rep 2011; 12:115-120.
18. White MA, Dehaan AP, Stephens DD, et al. Validation of a high fidelity adult ureteroscopy and renoscopy simulator. J Urol 2010; 183:673-677.
19. McDougall EM. Validation of surgical simulators. J Endourol 2007; 21:244-247.
20. Van Nortwick SS, Lendvay TS, Jensen AR, et al. Methodologies for establishing validity in surgical simulation studies. Surgery 2010; 147:622-630.
21. Van der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1996; 1:41-67.
22. Strohmaier WL, Giese A. Porcine urinary tract as a training model for ureteroscopy. Urol Int 2001; 66:30-32.
23. Celia A, Zeccolini G. Ex vivo models for training in endourology: construction of the model and simulation of training procedures. Urologia 2011; 78 (S1):16-20.
24. Liske P, Zimmermanns V, Lahme S. Training of upper urinary tract endoscopy: experience with a new model using porcine urinary tract. Eur Urol Suppl 2012; 11:105.
25. Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF. Accreditation council on graduate medical education technical skills competency compliance: urologic surgical skills. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:454-457.
26. Huri E. The novel training modality of urotechnology on cadaveric samples. Technology and Training in Endourology 2014 Meeting, Torino, November 2014.
27. Preminger GM, Babayan RK, Merril GL, et al. Virtual reality surgical simulation in endoscopic urologic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 1996; 29:157-163.
28. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, et al. A novel approach to endourological training: training at the surgical skills center. J Urol 2001; 166:1261-1266.
29. Chou DS, Abdelshehid C, Clayman RV, et al. Comparison of results of virtualreality simulator and training model for basic ureteroscopy training. J Endourol 2006; 20:266-271.
30. Matsumoto ED, Pace KT, D'A Honey RJ. Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills. Int J Urol 2006; 13:896-901.
31. Mishra S, Sharma R, Kumar A, et al. Comparative performance of high-fidelity training models for flexible ureteroscopy: are all models effective? Indian J Urol 2011; 27:451-456.
32. Brehmer M, Swartz R. Training on bench models improves dexterity in ureteroscopy. Eur Urol 2005; 48:458-463.
33. Brehmer M, Tolley D. Validation of a bench model for endoscopic surgery in the upper urinary tract. Eur Urol 2002; 42:175-179.
34. Michel MS, Knoll T, Köhrmann KU, et al. Mentor: development and evaluation of a new computer-based interactive training system for virtual life-like simulation of diagnostic and therapeutic endourological procedures. BJU Int 2002; 89:174-177.
35. Watterson JD, Beiko DT, Kuan JK, et al. Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquisition of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator. J Urol 2002; 168:1928-1932.
36. Wilhelm DM, Ogan K, Roehrborn CG, et al. Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:675-681.
37. Jacomides L, Ogan K, Cadeddu JA, et al. Use of a virtual reality simulator for ureteroscopy training. J Urol 2004; 171:320-323.
38. Knoll T, Trojan L, Haecker A, et al. Validation of computer-based training in ureterorenoscopy. BJU Int 2005; 95:1276-1279.
39. Ogan K, Jacomides L, Shulman MJ, et al. Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver. J Urol 2004; 172:667-671.
40. Soria F, Morcillo E, Sanz JL, et al. Description and validation of realistic and structured endourology training model. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2014; 2:258-265.
41. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill. Ann Surg 2004; 240:374-381.
42. Shamim Khan M, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, et al. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int 2013; 111:518-523.
43. Paige J, Garbee D, Kozmenko V, et al. Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218:140-149.
44. Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R, et al. The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 214:214-230.
45. Boet S, Bould M, Layat Burn C, Reeves S. Twelve tips for a successful interprofessional team-based high-fidelity simulation education session. Med Teach 2014; 36:853-857.
46. Ahmed K, Jawad M, Abboudi M, et al. Effectiveness of procedural simulation in urology: a systematic review. J Urol 2011; 186:26-34.
47. Chatterjee S, Radomski S, Matsumoto ED. Durability of endourologic skills: two-year follow-up study. J Endo 2007; 21:843-846.