Variation of community consultation and public disclosure for a pediatric multi-centered "Exception from informed consent" trial

Clinical Trials

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 67-76

  Holsti, Maija ^a,b   Zemek, Roger ^c   Baren, Jill ^b,d   Stanley, Rachel M ^b,e   Mahajan, Prashant ^b,f   Vance, Cheryl ^b,g   Brown, Kathleen M ^b,h   Gonzalez, Victor ^b,i   King, Denise ^j   Jacobsen, Kammy ^a,b   Shreve, Kate ^b,h   Van De Bruinhorst, Katrina ^k   Jones, Anne Marie ^k   Chamberlain, James M ^b,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network   (United States)

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j EMMES CORPORATION   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Community consultation; Emergency research; Exception from informed consent; Multicentered randomized double blinded controlled study; Pediatrics; Public disclosure

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BUDGET; CHILD; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSULTATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EMERGENCY WARD; EPILEPTIC STATE; HUMAN; INFANT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NEWBORN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PEDIATRICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISCLOSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PEDIATRICS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; THIRD-PARTY CONSENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84922379180     PISSN: 17407745     EISSN: 17407753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1740774514555586     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Nick TG, et al. Minimal-risk waiver of informed consent and exception from informed consent (final Rule) studies at institutional review boards nationwide. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1134-1137.
2. Morrison CA, Horwitz IB and Carrick MM. Ethical and legal issues in emergency research: barriers to conducting prospective randomized trials in an emergency setting. J Surg Res 2009; 157: 115-122.
3. Schmidt TA, Salo D, Hughes JA, et al. Confronting the ethical challenges to informed consent in emergency medicine research. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11: 1082-1089.
4. Schmidt TA, Lewis RJ and Richardson LD. Current status of research on the federal guidelines for performing research using an exception from informed consent. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1022-1026.
5. Vaslef S, Cairns C and Falletta J. Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 1019-1023.
6. Morris MC. An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1113-1119.
7. Watters D, Sayre MR and Silbergleit R. Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1040-1044.
8. Thompson J. Ethical challenges of informed consent in prehospital research. CJEM 2003; 5: 108-114.
9. US Food and Drug Administration. Exception from informed consent for studies conducted in emergency settings: regulatory language and excerpts from preamble - information sheet: guidance for institutional review boards and clinical investigators 2010, http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm126482.htm (accessed 8 May 2014).
10. Biros M. Struggling with the rule: the exception from informed consent in resuscitation research. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: 344-345.
11. Delorio NM and McClure KB. Does the emergency exception from informed consent process protect research subjects? Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1056-1059.
12. Longfield JN, Morris MJ, Moran KA, et al. Community meetings for emergency research community consultation. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 731-736.
13. Dickert N and Kass N. Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68: 183-191, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953608005224 (accessed 8 May 2014).
14. Salzman JG, Frascone RJ, Godding BK, et al. Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 50: 448-455, 455.e1-455e4.
15. Richardson LD, Wilets I, Ragin DF, et al. Research without consent: community perspectives from the community VOICES study. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1082-1090.
16. Baren JM and Fish SS. Resuscitation research involving vulnerable populations: are additional protections needed for emergency exception from informed consent? Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1071-1077.
17. Richardson LD, Quest TE and Birnbaum S. Communicating with communities about emergency research. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1064-1070.
18. Chamberlain JM, Okada P, Holsti M, et al. Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 1652-1660.
19. Dayan P, Chamberlain J, Dean JM, et al. The pediatric emergency care applied research network: progress and update. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med 2006; 7: 128-135.
20. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for institutional review boards, clinical investigators, and sponsors: exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research, http://www.fda.gov/downloads/regulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm249673.pdf (2011, accessed 8 May 2014).
21. Sims CA, Isserman JA, Holena D, et al. Exception from informed consent for emergency research: consulting the trauma community. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 74: 157-165; discussion 165-166.
22. Goldstein JN, Espinola JA, Fisher J, et al. Public opinion of a stroke clinical trial using exception from informed consent. Int J Emerg Med 2010; 3: 385-389.
23. Goldstein J, Delaney K, Pelletier A, et al. A brief educational intervention may increase public acceptance of emergency research without consent. J Emerg Med 2010; 39: 419-435.
24. Kasner SE, Baren JM, Le Roux PD, et al. Community views on neurologic emergency treatment trials. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57: 346-354.e6.
25. Silbergleit R. Response to Food and Drug Administration draft guidance statement on research into the treatment of life-threatening emergency conditions using exception from informed consent: testimony of the neurological emergencies treatment trials. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: e63-e68.
26. McClure KB, Delorio NM, Gunnels MD, et al. Attitudes of emergency department patients and visitors regarding emergency exception from informed consent in resuscitation research, community consultation, and public notification. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 352-359.
27. Jacoby LH, Young B and Watt J. Public disclosure in research with exception from informed consent: the use of survey methods to assess its effectiveness. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2008; 3: 79-87.
28. Lynch CA, Houry DE, Dai D, et al. Evidence-based community consultation for traumatic brain injury. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18: 972-976.
29. Mosesso VN, Brown LH, Greene HL, et al. Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the public access defibrillation (PAD) trial experience. Resuscitation 2004; 61: 29-36.
30. Mosesso VN and Cone DC. Using the exception from informed consent regulations in research. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12: 1031-1039.
31. Nelson M, Schmidt TA, Delorio NM, et al. Community consultation methods in a study using exception to informed consent. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008; 12: 417-425.
32. Nelson MJ, Delorio NM, Schmidt T, et al. Local media influence on opting out from an exception from informed consent trial. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 55: 1-8.
33. Santora T, Cowell V and Trooskin S. Working through the public disclosure process mandated by use of 21 CFR 50.24 (exception to informed consent): guidelines for success. J Trauma 1998; 45: 907-913.
34. Sloan EP, Koenigsberg M, Houghton J, et al. The informed consent process and the use of the exception to informed consent in the clinical trial of diaspirin crosslinked hemoglobin (DCLHb) in severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 6: 1203-1208.
35. Sloan E, Nagy K and Barrett J. A proposed consent process in studies that use an exception to informed consent. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 6: 1283-1291.
36. Baren JM, Anicetti JP, Ledesma S, et al. An approach to community consultation prior to initiating an emergency research study incorporating a waiver of informed consent. Acad Emerg Med 1999; 6: 1210-1215.
37. Baren JM and Biros MH. The Research on Community Consultation: an Annotated Bibliography. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: 346-352.
38. Morris MC, Fischbach RL, Nelson RM, et al. A paradigm for inpatient resuscitation research with an exception from informed consent. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2567-2575.
39. Ramsey C, Quearry B and Ripley E. Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18: 733-740.