Public opinion of a stroke clinical trial using exception from informed consent

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 385-389

  Goldstein, Joshua N ^b,e   Espinola, Janice A ^b   Fisher, Jonathan ^c,e   Pallin, Daniel J ^a,d,e   Camargo Jr , Carlos A ^b,e  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Informed consent; Public opinion; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ACUTE STROKE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RELIGION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STROKE; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT;

EID: 79952739842     PISSN: 18651372     EISSN: 18651380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12245-010-0244-2     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH, Scott PA, Wijdicks EF (2007) Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 38:1655-1711 (Pubitemid 46691097)
2. Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, Fang J, Richards JA, Laupacis A, Kapral MK (2004) Impracticability of informed consent in the registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. N Engl J Med 350:1414-1421 (Pubitemid 38419995)
3. Chen DT, Case LD, Brott TG, Brown RD Jr, Silliman SL, Meschia JF, Worrall BB (2008) Impact of restricting enrollment in stroke genetics research to adults able to provide informed consent. Stroke 39:831-837 (Pubitemid 351619551)
4. Dani KA, McCormick MT, Muir KW (2008) Brain lesion volume and capacity for consent in stroke trials: potential regulatory barriers to the use of surrogate markers. Stroke 39:2336-2340
5. Morris MC (2005) An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations. Acad Emerg Med 12:1113-1119
6. Bateman BT, Meyers PM, Schumacher HC, Mangla S, Pile-Spellman J (2003) Conducting stroke research with an exception from the requirement for informed consent. Stroke 34:1317-1323 (Pubitemid 36547535)
7. Ali K, Roffe C, Crome P (2006) What patients want: consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke. Stroke 37:865-871 (Pubitemid 43731923)
8. Blixen CE, Agich GJ (2005) Stroke patients' preferences and values about emergency research. J Med Ethics 31:608-611 (Pubitemid 41488942)
9. Goldstein JN, Delaney KE, Pelletier AJ, Fisher J, Blanc PG, Halsey M, Pallin DJ, Camargo Jr CA. A Brief Educational Intervention May Increase Public Acceptance of Emergency Research without Consent. J Emerg Med. Epub before print Sept. 2008; doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.12.033
10. Lecouturier J, Rodgers H, Ford GA, Rapley T, Stobbart L, Louw SJ, Murtagh MJ (2008) Clinical research without consent in adults in the emergency setting: a review of patient and public views. BMC Med Ethics 9:9