Ethical challenges of informed consent in prehospital research

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 108-114

  Thompson, James ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

continuous positive airway pressure; exception to informed consent; informed consent; prehospital; research

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011527306     PISSN: 14818035     EISSN: 14818043     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1481803500008253     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gray, JD. The problem of consent in emergency medicine research. CJEM. 2001; 3(3):213–8.
2. Burdick, WP, Cassell, EJ, Leon, AC, Kaufman, SG. Preliminary evidence of impaired thinking in sick patients. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134: 1120–3.
3. Smithline, H, Mader, TJ, Crenshaw, BJ. Do patients with acute medical conditions have the capacity to give informed consent for emergency medicine research? Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 776–80.
4. Prentice, ED. Informed consent: the most important predictor. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 774–5.
5. Fitten, LJ, Waite, MS. Impact of medical hospitalization on treatment: decision-making capacity in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1990; 150: 1717–21.
6. Fitten, LJ, Lusky, R, Hamann, C. Assessing treatment decision-making capacity in elderly nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990; 38: 1097–104.
7. Smith, HL. Myocardial infarction: case studies of ethics in the consent situation. Soc Sci Med. 1974; 8: 399–404.
8. Silverman, HJ. Ethical considerations of ensuring an informed and autonomous consent in research involving critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996; 154: 582–6.
9. Coppolino, M, Ackerson, L. Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Chest. 2001; 119: 603–12.
10. Grim, PS, Singer, PA, Gramelspacher, GP, Feldman, T, Childers, RW, Siegler, M. Informed consent in emergency research: prehospital thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1989; 262: 252–5.
11. Hsieh, M, Dailey, MW, Callaway, CW. Surrogate consent by family members for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 851–3.
12. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Association. Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC). JAMA. 1986; 255: 2841–57.
13. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarcto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet. 1986; 1: 397–402.
14. Pepe, PE, Bonnin, MJ, Mattox, KL. Regulating the scope of EMS. Prehosp Disas Med. 1990; 5: 59–63.
15. Callaham, M. Quantifying the scanty science of prehospital emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 30: 785–90.
16. Morrison, LJ, Verbeek, PR, McDonald, AC, Sawadsky, BV, Cook, DJ. Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2000; 283: 2686–92.
17. Weaver, WD, Cerqueira, M, Hallstrom, AP, Litwin, PE, Martin, JS, Kudenchuk, PJ, et al. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1993; 270: 1211–6.
18. Gibler, WB, Kereiakes, DJ, Dean, EN, Martin, L, Anderson, L, Abbottsmith, CW, et al. Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a north-south perspective. The Cincinnati Heart Project and the Nashville Prehospital TPA Trial. Am Heart J. 1991; 121(1 Pt 1):1–11.
19. Gausche, M, Lewis, RJ, Stratton, SJ, Haynes, BE, Gunter, CS, Goodrich, SM, et al. Effect of out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA. 2000; 283: 783–90.
20. Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Field, BJ, Spaite, DW, De Maio, VJ, Ward, R, et al. Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimization of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study phase II. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support. JAMA. 1999; 281: 1175–81.
21. Alpert, S. Implementing the final rule. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 1188–9.
22. Passamani, ER, Weisfeldt, ML. 31st Bethesda Conference. Emergency Cardiac Care. Task force 3: Special aspects of research conduct in the emergency setting: Waiver of informed consent. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 862–80.
23. Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.24 (21CFR50.24). Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (61 FR 51528). US Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services; Oct 2, 1996. Available: www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?FR=50.24(database updated 2002 Apr 1; site accessed 2003 Jan 17).
24. Tri-Council Policy Statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa: Medical Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; 1998. Available: www.nserc.ca/programs/ethics/english/ethics/policy.htm (updated 2000 Nov 21; accessed 2003 Jan 17).
25. Free and informed consent: Research in emergency health situations. Article 2.8. In: Tri-Council Policy Statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa: Medical Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; 1998. Available: www.nserc.ca/programs/ethics/english/sec02.htm#F (accessed 2003 Jan 17).
26. Shah, AN, Surgarman, J. Protecting research subjects under the waiver of informed consent for emergency research: experiences with efforts to inform the community. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 41: 72–8.
27. Schmidt, TA. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments for emergency exception from informed consent. Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 41: 79–81.
28. Alldredge, B, Gelb, A, Isaacs, S, Corry, MD, Allen, F, Ulrich, SK. et al. A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 631–7.
29. Ochs, M, Davis, D, Hoyt, D, Bailey, D, Marshall, L, Rosen, P. Paramedic-performed rapid sequence intubation of patients with severe head injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 159–67.
30. Dorian, P, Cass, D, Schwartz, B, Cooper, R, Gelaznikas, R, Barr, A. Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2002;347:955]. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 884–90.
31. Abu-Laban, RB, Christenson, JM, Innes, GD, van Beek, CA, Wanger, KP, McKnight, RD, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator in cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1522–8.
32. Smithline, HA, Gerstle, ML. Waiver of informed consent: a survey of emergency medicine patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1998; 16: 90–1.
33. McRae, A, Weijer, C. Lessons from everyday lives: a moral justification for acute care research. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30: 1146–51.
34. Fost, N. Can acutely ill patients consent to research? Resolving an ethical dilemma with facts. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 772–3.
35. Evaluation of NIH implementation of Section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, mandating a program of protection for research subjects. Review draft final report. NIH contract no. N01-OD-2–2109. Bethesda (MD): Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health; May 1998.
36. Steinbrook, R. Improving protection for research subjects. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1425–30.
37. Christian, MC, Goldberg, JL, Killen, J, Abrams, JS, McCabe, MS, Mauer, JK, et al. A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1405–8.
38. Tully, J, Ninis, N, Booy, R, Viner, R. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study. BMJ. 2000; 320: 1179–82.
39. Ferris, L. Industry-sponsored pharmaceutical trials and research ethics boards: Are they cloaked in too much secrecy?. CMAJ. 2002; 166: 1279–80.
40. Slater, EE. IRB reform. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1402–4.