How to estimate aortic characteristic impedance from magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry data?

Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 575-583

  Bollache, Emilie ^a,b,c   Kachenoura, Nadjia ^a,b   Bargiotas, Ioannis ^a,b   Giron, Alain ^a,b   De Cesare, Alain ^a,b   Bensalah, Mourad ^a,b   Lucor, Didier ^c   Redheuil, Alban ^a,b,d   Mousseaux, Elie ^e,f  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UPMC Univ Paris 06   (France)

^c INSTITUT JEAN LE ROND D ALEMBERT   (France)

^d PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^e HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^f PARIS CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

Author keywords

aortic characteristic impedance; applanation tonometry; pulsatile load; velocity encoded magnetic resonance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC CHARACTERISTIC IMPEDANCE; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CAROTID PULSE PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY SYSTOLIC UP SLOPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; IMPEDANCE; MAGNITUDES AT SPECIFIC TIMES; MALE; PRESSURE FLOW LOOP EARLY SYSTOLIC SLOPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; REFERENCE VALUE; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIME DERIVATIVE PEAKS RATIO; TONOMETRY; WAVEFORM; AORTA; BLOOD PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SYSTOLE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; SYSTOLE;

EID: 84922369154     PISSN: 02636352     EISSN: 14735598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000448     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness:methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:2588-2605
2. Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Pencina MJ, Hamburg NM, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2010; 121:505-511
3. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:1318-1327
4. Redheuil A, Yu WC, Mousseaux E, Harouni AA, Kachenoura N, Wu CO, et al. Age-related changes in aortic arch geometry: relationship with proximal aortic function and left ventricular mass and remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:1262-1270
5. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF, Vlachopoulos C. McDonald's blood flow in arteries. Theoretical, experimental and clinical principles, 6th ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2011; pp. 210-212
6. Chirinos JA, Segers P, Raina A, Saif H, Swillens A, Gupta AK, et al. Arterial pulsatile hemodynamic load induced by isometric exercise strongly predicts left ventricular mass in hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009; 298:H320-330
7. Binkley PF, Van Fossen DB, Nunziata E, Unverferth DV, Leier CV. Influence of positive inotropic therapy on pulsatile hydraulic load and ventricular-vascular coupling in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15:1127-1135
8. Gundel W, Cherry G, Rajagopalan B, Tan LB, Lee G, Schultz D. Aortic input impedance in man: acute response to vasodilator drugs. Circulation 1981; 63:1305-1314
9. Kelly R, Fitchett D. Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:952-963
10. Kromer EP, Elsner D, Holmer SR, Muntze A, Riegger GA. Aortic input impedence and neurohormonal activation in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 1992; 26:265-272
11. Laskey WK, Kussmaul WG, Martin JL, Kleaveland JP, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Shroff S. Characteristics of vascular hydraulic load in patients with heart failure. Circulation 1985; 72:61-71
12. Lucas CL, Wilcox BR, Ha B, Henry GW. Comparison of time domain algorithms for estimating aortic characteristic impedance in humans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988; 35:62-68
13. Merillon JP, Fontenier G, Lerallut JF, Jaffrin MY, Chastre J, Assayag P, et al. Aortic input impedance in heart failure: comparison with normal subjects and its changes during vasodilator therapy. Eur Heart J 1984; 5:447-455
14. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation 1980; 62:105-116
15. Nichols WW, Conti CR, Walker WE, Milnor WR. Input impedance of the systemic circulation in man. Circ Res 1977; 40:451-458
16. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Yaginuma T, Murgo JP, Pepine CJ, Conti CR. Effects of age on ventricular-vascular coupling. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55:1179-1184
17. Pepine CJ, Nichols WW, Conti CR. Aortic input impedance in heart failure. Circulation 1978; 58:460-465
18. Ting CT, Brin KP, Lin SJ, Wang SP, Chang MS, Chiang BN, Yin FC. Arterial hemodynamics in human hypertension. J Clin Invest 1986; 78:1462-1471
19. Cholley BP, Shroff SG, Sandelski J, Korcarz C, Balasia BA, Jain S, et al. Differential effects of chronic oral antihypertensive therapies on systemic arterial circulation and ventricular energetics in African-American patients. Circulation 1995; 91:1052-1062
20. Mitchell GF, Tardif JC, Arnold JM, Marchiori G, O'Brien TX, Dunlap ME, Pfeffer MA. Pulsatile hemodynamics in congestive heart failure. Hypertension 2001; 38:1433-1439
21. Segers P, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Vermeersch SJ, De Bacquer D, Van Bortel LM, et al. Noninvasive (input) impedance, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflection in healthy middle-aged men and women. Hypertension 2007; 49:1248-1255
22. Dujardin JP, Stone DN. Characteristic impedance of the proximal aorta determined in the time and frequency domain: a comparison. Med Biol Eng Comput 1981; 19:565-568
23. Levy BI, Babalis D, Lacolley P, Poitevin P, Safar ME. Cardiac hypertrophy and characteristic impedance in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens Suppl 1988; 6:S110-111
24. Li JK. Time domain resolution of forward and reflected waves in the aorta. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986; 33:783-785
25. Mitchell GF, Gudnason V, Launer LJ, Aspelund T, Harris TB. Hemodynamics of increased pulse pressure in older women in the communitybased Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Hypertension 2008; 51:1123-1128
26. Mitchell GF, Izzo JL Jr, Lacourciere Y, Ouellet JP, Neutel J, Qian C, et al. Omapatrilat reduces pulse pressure and proximal aortic stiffness in patients with systolic hypertension: results of the conduit hemodynamics of omapatrilat international research study. Circulation 2002; 105:2955-2961
27. Mitchell GF, Lacourciere Y, Ouellet JP, Izzo JL Jr, Neutel J, Kerwin LJ, et al. Determinants of elevated pulse pressure in middle-aged and older subjects with uncomplicated systolic hypertension: the role of proximal aortic diameter and the aortic pressure-flow relationship. Circulation 2003; 108:1592-1598
28. Mitchell GF, Van Buchem MA, Sigurdsson S, Gotal JD, Jonsdottir MK, Kjartansson O, et al. Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility:Reykjavik study. Brain 2011; 134:3398-3407
29. Sweitzer NK, Shenoy M, Stein JH, Keles S, Palta M, LeCaire T, Mitchell GF. Increases in central aortic impedance precede alterations in arterial stiffness measures in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30:2886-2891
30. Dogui A, Kachenoura N, Frouin F, Lefort M, De Cesare A, Mousseaux E, Herment A. Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13:11
31. Dogui A, Redheuil A, Lefort M, DeCesare A, Kachenoura N, Herment A, Mousseaux E. Measurement of aortic arch pulse wave velocity in cardiovascular MR: comparison of transit time estimators and description of a new approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33:1321-1329
32. Grotenhuis HB, Ottenkamp J, Westenberg JJ, Bax JJ, Kroft LJ, De Roos A. Reduced aortic elasticity and dilatation are associated with aortic regurgitation and left ventricular hypertrophy in nonstenotic bicuspid aortic valve patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:1660-1665
33. Redheuil A, Yu WC, Wu CO, Mousseaux E, De Cesare A, Yan R, et al. Reduced ascending aortic strain and distensibility: earliest manifestations of vascular aging in humans. Hypertension 2010; 55:319-326
34. Firmin DN, Nayler GL, Kilner PJ, Longmore DB. The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14:230-241
35. Gatehouse PD, Keegan J, Crowe LA, Masood S, Mohiaddin RH, Kreitner KF, Firmin DN. Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:2172-2184
36. Segers P, De Backer J, Devos D, Rabben SI, Gillebert TC, Van Bortel LM, et al. Aortic reflection coefficients and their association with global indexes of wave reflection in healthy controls and patients with Marfan's syndrome. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 290:H2385-2392
37. Salvi P, Lio G, Labat C, Ricci E, Pannier B, Benetos A. Validation of a new noninvasive portable tonometer for determining arterial pressure wave and pulse wave velocity: the PulsePen device. J Hypertens 2004; 22:2285-2293
38. Herment A, Kachenoura N, Lefort M, Bensalah M, Dogui A, Frouin F, et al. Automated segmentation of the aorta from phase contrast MR images: validation against expert tracing in healthy volunteers and in patients with a dilated aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31:881-888
39. Corden B, Keenan NG, De Marvao AS, Dawes TJ, Decesare A, Diamond T, et al. Body fat is associated with reduced aortic stiffness until middle age. Hypertension 2013; 61:1322-1327
40. Westenberg JJ, Van Poelgeest EP, Steendijk P, Grotenhuis HB, Jukema JW, De Roos A. Bramwell-Hill modeling for local aortic pulse wave velocity estimation: a validation study with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive pressure assessment. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14:2
41. Chemla D, Plamann K, Nitenberg A. Towards new indices of arterial stiffness using systolic pulse contour analysis: a theoretical point of view. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2008; 51:111-117
42. Mitchell GF, Pfeffer MA, Westerhof N, Pfeffer JM. Measurement of aortic input impedance in rats. Am J Physiol 1994; 267:H1907-H11915
43. Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC 2003; 973-974
44. Garcia J, Kadem L, Larose E, Clavel MA, Pibarot P. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13:25
45. Merillon JP, Motte G, Masquet C, Azancot I, Guiomard A, Gourgon R. Relationship between physical properties of the arterial system and left ventricular performance in the course of aging and arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 1982; 3 (Suppl A):95-102
46. Mitchell GF, Wang N, Palmisano JN, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, et al. Hemodynamic correlates of blood pressure across the adult age spectrum: noninvasive evaluation in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2010; 122:1379-1386
47. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF, Vlachopoulos C. McDonald's blood flow in arteries. Theoretical, experimental and clinical principles, 6th ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2011; pp. 91-93
48. Van Bortel LM, Balkestein EJ, Van Der Heijden-Spek JJ, Vanmolkot FH, Staessen JA, Kragten JA, et al. Noninvasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking. J Hypertens 2001; 19:1037-1044
49. Borow KM, Newburger JW. Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements. Am Heart J 1982; 103:879-886
50. Chernobelsky A, Shubayev O, Comeau CR, Wolff SD. Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007; 9:681-685