Energy policy planning near grid parity using a price-driven technology penetration model

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 90, Issue PB, 2015, Pages 389-399

  Lund, Peter D ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Diffusion model; Electricity price; Grid parity; Market penetration; New energy technologies

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COMPETITION; COSTS;

DIFFUSION MODEL; ELECTRICITY PRICES; GRID PARITIES; MARKET PENETRATION; NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES;

FINANCIAL MARKETS;

ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY POLICY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRICE DYNAMICS;

EID: 84922283743     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Pachauri R.K. The way forward in climate change mitigation. WIREs Energy Environ. 2012, 1:3-8. 10.1002/wene.36.
2. Diaz-Rainey I., Tzavara D. Financing the decarbonized energy system through green electricity tariffs: a diffusion model of an induced consumer environmental market. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79:1693-1704.
3. Higgins A., McNamara C., Foliente G. Modelling future uptake of solar photo-voltaics and water heaters under different government incentives. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 83:142-155.
4. Reuter W.R., Szolgayová J., Fuss S., Obersteiner M. Renewable energy investment: policy and market impacts. Appl. Energy 2012, 97:249-254.
5. International Energy Agency Renewable Energy Medium-term Market Report 2013 2013, OECD/IEA, Paris.
6. REN21 Renewable Global Status Report 2013 2013, (http://www.ren21.net). E. Martinot, J. Sawin (Eds.).
7. International Energy Agency Energy technology perspectives 2012. Pathways to a Clean Energy System 2012, OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
8. International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2012 2012, OECD/IEA, Paris.
9. Danish Energy Regulatory Authority Results and Challenges 2010 Copenhagen. http://www.energitilsynet.dk/.
10. Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) http://www.bmu.de/en/.
11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC 4th assessment report. Working Group III Report "Mitigation of Climate Change" 2008, ().
12. Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2012, Cambridge University Press, UK. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs Madrug, Y. Sokona (Eds.).
13. International Energy Agency Energy technology perspectives 2008. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050 2008, OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
14. BV Shell International Shell Energy Scenarios to 2050 The Netherlands. http://www.shell.com/global/future-energy/scenarios/2050.html.
15. Jacobson M.Z., Delucchi M.A. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part I: technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy 2011, 39:1154-1169.
16. Jacobson M.Z., Delucchi M.A. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part II. Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy 2011, 39:1170-1190.
17. Ridsdale D. Averting the war. Sol. Int. 2013, 3:12-15. (www.solar-international.com).
18. Lund P.D. Effectiveness of policy measures in transforming the energy system. Energy Policy 2007, 35:627-639.
19. Lund P.D. Effects of energy policies on industry expansion in renewable energy. Renew. Energy 2009, 34:53-64.
20. Geroski P.A. Models of technology diffusion. Res. Policy 2000, 29:603-625.
21. Stoneman P. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2004, 18:107-126. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, UK. 1995 edition markets.
22. Fisher J.C., Pry R.H. A simple substitution model for technological change. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1971, 3:75-88.
23. Packey D.J. Market penetration of new energy technologies. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report NREL/TP-462-4860, Golden, Colorado, USA 1993.
24. Rao U.K., Kishor V.V.N. A review of technology diffusion models with special reference to renewable energy technologies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2010, 14:1070-1078.
25. Davies S.W., Diaz-Rainey I. The patterns of induced diffusion: evidence from the international diffusion of wind energy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:1227-1241.
26. Duan H.-B., Zhu L., Fan Y. A cross-country study on the relationship between diffusion of wind and photovoltaic solar technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 83:156-169.
27. Tran M. Technology-behavioural modelling of energy innovation diffusion in the UK. Appl. Energy 2012, 95:1-11.
28. Kamakura W.A., Balasubramanian S.K. Long-term view of diffusion of durables. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1988, 5:1-13.
29. Horsky D. A diffusion model incorporating product benefits, price, income and information. Mark. Sci. 1990, 9:342-364.
30. Letschert V.E., McNeil M.A. Material world: forecasting household appliance ownership in a growing global economy. Report LBNL-2403E 2009, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA.
31. Tsai B.-H. Predicting the diffusion of LCD TVs by incorporating price in the extended Gompertz model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80:106-131.
32. Parker P.M. Price elasticity dynamics over the adoption life cycle. J. Mark. Res. 1992, XXIX:358-367.
33. Bottomley P.A., Fildes R. The role of prices in models of innovation diffusion. J. Forecast. 1998, 17:539-555.
34. Fishbone L.G., Abilock H. MARKAL, a linear-programming model for energy system analysis: technical description of the BNL version. Energy Res. 1981, 3:353-375.
35. Fragkos P., Kouvaritakis N., Capros P. Model-based analysis of the future strategies for the MENA energy system. Energy Strategy Rev. 2013, 2:59-70.
36. Loulou R., Labriet M. ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model. Part I: model structure. CMS 2008, 5:7-40.
37. Loulou R. ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model. Part II: mathematical formulation. CMS 2008, 5:41-66.
38. Peterka V. Macrodynamics of technological change: market penetration by new technologies. International Institute for Applied System Analysis, IIASA Report RR-77-22, Laxenburg, Austria 1977.
39. Peterka V., Fleck F. The dynamics of energy systems and the logistic substitution model. International Institute for Applied System Analysis, IIASA Report AR-78-1C, Laxenburg, Austria 1978.
40. Spinrad B.I. Market substitution models and economic parameters. International Institute for Applied System Analysis, IIASA Report RR-80-28, Laxenburg, Austria 1980.
41. Lund P.D. Exploring past energy changes and their implications for the pace of penetration of new energy technologies. Energy 2010, 35:647-656.
42. Lund P.D. Fast market penetration in retrospect with application to clean energy futures. Appl. Energy 2010, 87:3575-3583.
43. Bass F.M., Krishnan T.V., Jain D.C. Why the Bass model fits without decision variables. Manag. Sci. 1994, 13:203-216.
44. Krishnan T.V., Bass F.M., Jain D.C. Optimal pricing strategy for new products. Manag. Sci. 1999, 45:1650-1663.
45. Mahajan V., Muller E., Bass F. New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research. J. Mark. 1990, 54:1-26.
46. Teotia A.P.S., Raju P.S. Forecasting the market penetration of new technologies using a combination of economic cost and diffusion models. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 1986, 4:225-237.
47. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, USA.
48. European Commission Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; Energy 2020. COM(2010) 639, Brussels 2010.
49. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2013 http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview.
50. Movellan J. Is the Japan PV Market the Next Big Thing? Renewable Energy World.com, May 2013 http://www.renewableenergyworld.com.
51. http://www.gov.cn.
52. Ecology Global Network http://www.ecology.com/2013/03/15/solar-power-in-china/.
53. European Commission Eurostat, 2013 http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Energy_price:statistics.
54. Energy Savings Trust (UK) Feed-In Tariffs scheme (FITs) http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/Generating-energy/Getting-money-back/Feed-In-Tariffs-scheme-FITs#about.
55. U.S.Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2013 http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf.
56. Global Market Outlook for Photovoltaics 2013-2017 2013, European Photovoltaic Industry Association, (www.epia.org). G. Winneker (Ed.).
57. Tarjanne R., Kivistö A. Comparison of electricity generation costs. Report EN A56 2008, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland.
58. Wene C.O. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy 2000, International Energy Agency, Paris.
59. Junginger M., Faaij A., Turkenburg W.C. Global experience curves for wind farms. Energy Policy 2005, 33:133-150.
60. U.S.Department of Energy Hydropower. Setting a Course of our Energy Future 2004, (Washington, DC).
61. Spath P.L., Mann M.K. Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined-cycle power generation system. Report NREL/TP-570-277715 2000, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado.
62. Spath P.L., Mann M.K., Kerr D.R. Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power production. Report NREL/TP-570-25119 1999, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado.
63. Lund P.D. How fast can businesses in the new energy sector grow? An analysis of critical factors. Renew. Energy 2014, 66:33-40. 10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.061.
64. German Solar Industry Association (BSW-Solar). Statistic data on the German Solar power (photovoltaic) industry March 2014. http://www.solarwirtschaft.de/fileadmin/media/pdf/2013_2_BSW-Solar_fact_sheet_solar_power.pdf.