Compliance with the international code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes: An observational study of pediatricians' waiting rooms

Breastfeeding Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 135-141

  Dodgson, Joan E ^a   Watkins, Amanda L ^a   Bond, Angela B ^a   Kintaro Tagaloa, Cheryl ^a   Arellano, Alondra ^a   Allred, Patrick A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST FEEDING EDUCATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FAMILY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CODE OF MARKETING OF BREAST MILK SUBSTITUTES; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PEDIATRICIAN; PEDIATRICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; WAITING ROOM; ADVERTIZING; ARTIFICIAL MILK; BREAST FEEDING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; INFANT NUTRITION; MARKETING; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; STANDARDS;

ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; ARIZONA; BREAST FEEDING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INFANT FORMULA; INFANT NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; INFANT, NEWBORN; MARKETING; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

EID: 84922248294     PISSN: 15568253     EISSN: 15568342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2013.0096     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Report Card - United States, 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, 2013
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2011
3. World Health Organization. International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1981
4. Sinai LN; 2012 Annual Leadership Forum. Divesting from Formula Marketing in Pediatric Care. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL, 2011
5. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM clinical protocol #14: Breastfeeding-friendly physician's office, Part 1: Optimizing care for infants and children. Breastfeed Med 2006;1:115-119
6. Nutrition Section UNICEF. National Implementation of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. UNICEF, New York, 2011
7. Barennes H, Empis G, Quang TD, et al. Breast-milk substitutes: A new old-threat for breastfeeding policy in developing countries. A case study in a traditionally high breastfeeding country. PLoS One 2012;7:e30634
8. Kent G. Regulating Infant Formula. Hale Publishing, Amarillo, TX, 2011
9. Forsyth S. Non-compliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes is not confined to the infant formula industry. J Public Health 2013;35:185-190
10. Huang Y, Labiner-Wolfe J, Huang H, et al. Association of health profession and direct-to-consumer marketing with infant formula choice and switching. Birth 2013;40:24-31
11. Arizona Department of State. Arizona Administrative Register, 18 (52). Definitions. TITLE 9. Health Services Arizona Administrative Code R9-17-101. Arizona Department of State, Phoenix, 2012, pp. 3358-3359
12. U.S. Census Bureau. State and County Quick Facts - Maricopa County, Arizona. U.S. Census Office, Washington, DC, 2012
13. Maricopa County Department of Public Health Office of Epidemiology. Health Status Report for Cities and Towns in Maricopa County, 2009-2011. Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Phoenix, 2013
14. USDA/FNS Supplemental Foods Programs Division. WIC Breastfeeding Data: Local Agency Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 2011
15. Arizona Department of Health Services. Arizona State Vaccines for Children Program Registry. Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, 2012
16. Shubber S, Jennings R. The WHO Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes: History and Analysis, 2nd ed. Pinter & Martin, New York, 2011
17. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2010. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 2011
18. SPSS Statistics, Version 19.0. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, 2010
19. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G.Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:1149-1160
20. Dusdieker LB, Dungy CI, Losch ME. Prenatal office practices regarding infant feeding choices. Clin Pediatr 2006;45:841-845
21. Valaitis RK, Sheeshka JD, O'Brien MF. Do consumer infant feeding publications and products available in physicians' offices protect, promote, and support breastfeeding? J Hum Lact 1997;13:203-208
22. Berry NJ, Jones SC, Iverson D. Circumventing the WHO Code? An observational study. Arch Dis Child 2012;97:320-325
23. Dykes F, Richardson-Foster H, Crossland N, et al. 'Dancing on a thin line': Evaluation of an infant feeding information team to implement the WHO Code of Marketing of Breast- Milk Substitutes. Midwifery 2012;28:765-771
24. Ergin A, Hatipoǧlu C, Bozkurt A, et al. Compliance status of product labels to the International Code on Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes. Matern Child Health J 2013;17:62-67
25. Forsyth S. Three decades of the WHO code and marketing of infant formulas. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2012;15: 273-277
26. Geraghty SR, Riddle SW, Shaikh U. The breastfeeding mother and the pediatrician. J Hum Lact 2008;24:335-339
27. American Academy of Pediatrics. How to Have a Breastfeeding Friendly Practice. Breastfeeding Initiatives. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL, 2010
28. Corriveau SK, Drake EE, Kellams AL, et al. Evaluation of an office protocol to increase exclusivity of breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2013;131:942-950
29. Howard C, Howard F, Lawrence R, et al. Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:296-303
30. Parry K, Taylor E, Hall-Dardess P, et al. Understanding women's interpretations of infant formula advertising. Birth 2013;40:115-124
31. Feirdman-Winter L, Grossman X, Paianiappan A, et al. Removal of industry-sponsored formula sample packs from the hospital: Does it make a difference? J Hum Lact 2012;28: 380-388
32. Sobel HL, Iellamo A, Raya RR, et al. Is unimpeded marketing for breast milk substitutes responsible for the decline in breastfeeding in the Philippines? An exploratory survey and focus group analysis. Soc Sci Med 2011;73:1445- 1448
33. Apple RD. ''To be used only under the direction of a physician'': Commercial infant feeding and medical practice, 1870-1940. Bull History Med 1980;54:402-417
34. Bar-Yam NB. Political issues. 1981-2001: Twenty years of the WHO Code.for Marketing Breastmilk Substitutes. Int J Childbirth Educ 2001;16:20-23
35. American Academy of Pediatrics. Uses of human milk. Pediatrics 2011;129:e827
36. Bartick M, Reinhold A. The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: A pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics 2010;125:E1048-E1056.