Circumventing the WHO Code? An observational study

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 320-325

  Berry, Nina J ^a   Jones, Sandra C ^a   Iverson, Don ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MILK; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CONTENT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CODES OF ETHICS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT FORMULA; PARENTING; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84859161599     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 14682044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.202051     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. NHMRC. Dietary Guidelines for Children and Adolescents in Australia. Canberra, ACT:Commonwealth of Australia, 2003.
2. World Heath Organization/UNICEF. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. Geneva:WHO/UNICEF, 2003.
3. Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, et al.;American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2005;115:496-506.
4. UK Department of Health. Infant Feeding Recommendation. London:UK DH , 2003. http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/09/69/99/04096999.pdf ( accessed June 2009 ).
5. Health Canada. Nutrition for Healthy Term Infants. Ottawa, ON:Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2005.
6. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2007;153:1-186.
7. Horta B L, Bahl R, Martines JC, et al. E vidence on the Long Term Effects of Breastfeeding: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Geneva:WHO - Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, 2007.
8. Labbok MH. Effects of breastfeeding on the mother. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001;48:143-58.
9. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4810.0.55.001-Breastfeeding in Australia, 2001. Canberra, ACT:ABS, 2003. http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@. nsf/525a1b940 2141235ca25682000146abc/ 8e65d6253e10f802ca256da40003a07c!OpenDocumen t ( accessed March 2011 ).
10. Centers for Disease Control. National Immunisation Survey-Table 3: Any and Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates by Age, 2005. US Department of Health & Human Services, 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/NIS-data/index.htm ( accessed 18 Jun 2011 ).
11. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey. Ottawa, ON:Health Canada, 2008. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey &SurvId=3226&SurvVer=0&InstaId=15282&InstaVer=4&SDDS= 3226&lang=en&d b=IMDB&dbg=f&adm=8&dis=2#b3 ( accessed Aug 2009 ).
12. Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, et al. Infant Feeding 2005. London:National Health Service, 2007.
13. Greiner T. The Promotion of Bottle Feeding by Multinational Corporations: How Advertising and the Health Professions Have Contributed. In:Latham MC, ed. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University, Program on International Nutrition and Development Policy, 1975.
14. Greiner T, Latham MC. The influence of infant food advertising on infant feeding practices in St. Vincent. Int J Health Serv 1982;12:53-75.
15. Stewart JF, Popkin BM, Guilkey DK, et al. Influences on the extent of breast-feeding: a prospective study in the Philippines. Demography 1991;28:181-99.
16. Guilkey DK, Stewart JF. Infant feeding patterns and the marketing of infant foods in the Philippines. Econ Dev Cult Change 1995;43:369-99.
17. Stewart JF, Guilkey DK. Estimating the health impact of industry food marketing practices in the Philippines. J Dev Stud 2000;36:50-78.
18. Howard C, Howard F, Lawrence R, et al. Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:296-303.
19. Chapman S. Unravelling gossamer with boxing gloves: problems in explaining the decline in smoking. BMJ 1993;307:429-32.
20. Cherrington J, Chamberlain K, Grixti J. Relocating alcohol advertising research: examining socially mediated relationships with alcohol. J Health Psychol 2006;11:209-22.
21. van Esterik P. Social and Demographic Aspects: The Cultural Context of Breastfeeding and Breastfeeding Policy. Food Nutr Bull 1996;17. http:www.nzdl. org/gsdlmod?e=d-00000-00---off-0fnl2.2--00-0----0-10-0---0---0direct-10---4----- --0- 1l--11-en-50---20-about---00-0-1-00---4----0-0-11-1-0utfZz-8-00&a= d&cl=CL3.66&d =HASHc900341280ec04fe735b3e.7.fc ( accessed Jun 2011 ).
22. Hodgetts D, Bolam B, Stephens C. Mediation and the construction of contemporary understandings of health and lifestyle. J Health Psychol 2005;10:123-36.
23. World Health Assembly. Infant Formula and Related Trade Issues in the Context of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. Geneva:WHA , 1992.
24. World Health Assembly. International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. Geneva:WHA, 1981.
25. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Marketing in Australia of Infant Formulas: Manufacturers and Importers Agreement 1992. Canberra, ACT:Department of Health and Ageing, 1992. http://www.health.gov.au/ internet/ main/publishing.nsf/Content/phd-apmaif-brochure ( accessed 18 Jun 2011 ).
26. The Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula Regulations 1995. SI 1995/77. London: TSO; 1995.
27. R ichter J. Holding Corporations Accountable: Corporate Conduct, International Codes and Citizen Action. London:Zed Books, 2001.
28. D uffy J. Legal Challenge to Baby Milk Law. Sunday Herald, 20 January 2008.
29. Minchin M. Breastfeeding Matters. Melbourne:Alma Publications, 1998.
30. Palmer G. The Politics of Breastfeeding. 3rd edn. London:Pinter & Martin, 2009.
31. Salasibew M, Kiani A, Faragher B, et al. A wareness and reported violations of the WHO International Code and Pakistan's national breastfeeding legislation; a descriptive cross-sectional survey. Int Breastfeed J 2008;3:24.
32. Merrett N. UK Clamps Down on Infant Formula Promotion, 2007. http:// dairyreporter.com/content/view/print/152327 ( accessed 15 Jun 2010 ).
33. Starling S. UK Baby Milk Industry Wins Labelling Battle, 2008. http:// nutraingredients.com/content/view/print/56393 ( accessed 15 Jun 2010 ).
34. McNally A. Industry Challenge Infant Nutrition Rules, 2008. http://www. nutraingredients.com/Regulation/Industry-challenge-to-infant-nutrition-rules ( accessed 18 Jun 2011 ).
35. McNally A. Industry Postpones Infant Nutrition Rules, 2008. http://www. nutraingredients.com/Regulation/Industry-postpones-infant-nutrition-rules ( accessed 15 Jun 2010 ).
36. International Association of Infant Food Manufacturers. Glossary, 2008. http:// www.ifm.net/glossary.htm ( accessed Sep 2008 ).
37. Berry NJ, Jones S, Iverson D. It's all formula to me: women's understandings of toddler milk ads. Breastfeed Rev 2010;18:21-30.
38. NOP World for Department of Health. Attitudes to Feeding: Report of Survey Findings. London:Crown, 2005. http://www.dh.gov.uk/ PublicationsAndStatistics/ Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/ en?CONTENT-ID=4118853&chk=j6wH4i ( accessed Mar 2011 ).
39. National Childbirth Trust/Unicef UK. Follow-On Milk Advertising Survey: Topline Results, 2005. http://www.unicef.org.uk/Documents/Baby.../formula- productions- mori-2005.pdf ( accessed 18 Jun 2011 ).
40. Baumslag N, Michels DL. Milk, Money and Madness. London:Bergin & Garvey , 1995.
41. Popkin BM, Fernandez ME, Avila JL. Infant formula promotion and the health sector in the Philippines. Am J Public Health 1990;80:74-5.
42. Nelson E A, Chan CW, Yu CM. Breast milk substitutes in Hong Kong. J Paediatr Child Health 2004;40:350-2.
43. Greiner T. The dangers of 'follow-up' feeds. Dialogue on Diarrhea 1991;46:4-6.
44. Donnelly A, Snowden HM, Renfrew MJ, et al. Commercial hospital discharge packs for breastfeeding women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD002075.
45. Rosenberg K D, Eastham CA, Kasehagen LJ, et al. Marketing infant formula through hospitals: the impact of commercial hospital discharge packs on breastfeeding. Am J Public Health 2008;98:290-5.
46. Kotler P, Armstrong G. Principles of Marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall, 2001.
47. Whan Park C, Milberg S, Lawson R. Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. J Consum Res 1991;18:185-93.
48. Assunta M, Chapman S. 'The world's most hostile environment': how the tobacco industry circumvented Singapore's advertising ban. Tob Control 2004;13 ( Suppl 2 ): ii51-7.
49. Assunta M, Chapman S. The tobacco industry's accounts of refining indirect tobacco advertising in Malaysia. Tob Control 2004 ; 13 ( Suppl 2 ): ii63-70.
50. Chapman S. Public Health Advocacy and Tobacco Control: Making Smoking History. Oxford:Blackwell, 2007.
51. McNally A. Follow-On Formula Escapes Advert Ban, 2007. http://www.nutraingredients.com/Regulation/Follow-on-formula-escapes-advert-ban ( accessed February 2011 ).
52. World Health Organization-Nutrition for Health and Development. Follow-Up Formula in the Context of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. Geneva:WHO, 2001.
53. Forsyth J S. International code of marketing of breastmilk substitutes-three decades later time for hostilities to be replaced by effective national and international governance. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:769-70.