Dis-inviting the Unruly Public

Science as Culture

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 99-107

  de Saille, Stevienna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

public engagement; responsible innovation; social movements

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922220233     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2014.986323     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. EC (2005) Communication to the spring European Council: Working together for growth and jobs, a new start for the Lisbon Strategy (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
2. Eden, G. (2014) Special Eurobarometer 401: Survey summary on responsible research and innovation, science and technology, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), pp. 129–132.
3. Eurobarometer (2013) Special Eurobarometer 401: Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Science and Technology (Summary). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm (accessed 6 February 2014).
4. Gurri, M. (2014) ‘How a tsunami of information inspired the revolt of the public’ at Libertarianism.org. Available at http://www.libertarianism.org/publications/essays/how-tsunami-information-inspired-revolt-public (accessed 20 September 2014).
5. Jasanoff, S. (2003) Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science, Minerva, 41(3), pp. 223–244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320
6. Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S.-H. (2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, Minerva, 47(2), pp. 119–146. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
7. Nowotny, H. (2014) Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets, Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), pp. 16–20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513476220
8. Oliver, P. (1989) Bringing the crowd back in: The nonorganizational elements of social movements, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 11(1), pp. 1–30.
9. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. and Stilgoe, J. (2012) Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society, Science and Public Policy, 39(6), pp. 751–760.
10. RRI Tools (2014) ‘RRI Tools: Building a better relationship between science and society’ at RRI tools project. Available at http://www.rri-tools.eu/project-description (accessed 23 October 2014).
11. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. and Macnaghten, P. (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Research Policy, 42(9), pp. 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
12. Sutcliffe, H. (2011) A report on responsible research & innovation (London: MATTER Business Group).
13. Von Schomberg, R. (2013) A vision of responsible innovation, in: R. Owen, J. Bessant and M. Heintz (Eds) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, pp. 51–74 (London: John Wiley).
14. Von Schomberg, R. (2014) The quest for the ‘right’ impacts of science and technology: a framework for Responsible Research and Innovation, in: J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B. Coops and H. Romijn (Eds) Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, pp. 33–50 (Dordrecht: Springer).
15. Welsh, I. and Wynne, B. (2013) Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: Passive objects, incipient threats, Science as Culture, 22(4), pp. 540–566. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2013.764072
16. Wynne, B. (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), pp. 281–304. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004