Factors determining authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions from economic history journals

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1347-1374

  Poelmans, Eline ^a   Rousseau, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Economic history; Manuscript submissions; Stated choice experiments; Willingness to wait

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922073731     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1469-2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abt, H. A. (1987). Are papers by well-known astronomers accepted for publication more readily than other papers? Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific,99, 439–441.
2. Alberini, A., Longo, A., & Veronesi, M. (2006). Basic statistical models for stated choice studies. In B. J. Kanninen (Ed.), Valuing environmental amenities using Stated choice studies (pp. 203–227). New York: Springer.
3. Amat, C. B. (2008). Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 Selected Food Research Journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics,74(3), 379.
4. Amaya-Amaya, M., Gerard, K., & Ryan, M. (2008). Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. In M. Ryan, K. Gerard, & M. Amaya-Amaya (Eds.), Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care (pp. 13–46). New York: Springer.
5. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education,19(2), 151–161.
6. Björk, B.-C., & Holmström, J. (2006). Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author’s viewpoint. Learned Publishing,19(2), 147–155.
7. Björk, B.-C., & Öörni, A. (2009). A method for comparing scholarly journals as service providers to authors. Serials Review,35, 62–69.
8. Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics,7, 914–923.
9. Cheung, C. (2010). Audience matters: A study of how authors select educational journals. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17, 191–201.
10. Christie, M., Warren, J., Hanley, N., Murphy, K., Wright, R., Hyde, T., et al. (2004). Developing measures for valuing changes in biodiversity: Final report. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
11. Conley, J. P., Crucinni, M. J., Driskill, R. A., & Onder, A. S. (2011). Incentives and the effects of publication lags on life cycle research productivity in economics. Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, working paper, no. 11-w22, November 2011.
12. Day, B., Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Dupont, D., Louviere, J. J., Morimoto, S., et al. (2012). Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,63(1), 73–91.
13. de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Hol, L., Donkers, B., van Dam, L., Habbema, J. D. F., van Leerdam, M. E., et al. (2010). Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: An application to colorectal cancer screening. Value in Health,13, 315–323.
14. Desjardins, Y. (2011). The work continues. Chronica Horticulturae,51(1), 3–4.
15. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2000). The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51(2), 158–165.
16. Ellison, G. (2002). The Economic slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process. Journal of Political Economy,110(5), 947–993.
17. Engels, T., Ossenblok, T., & Spruyt, E. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics,93(2), 373–390.
18. Frank, E. (1994). Authors’ criteria for selecting journals. Journal of the American Medical Association,272, 163–164.
19. Gordon, M. D. (1984). How authors select journals: A test of reward maximization models of submission behavior. Social Studies of Science,14, 27–43.
20. Hanley, N., Mourato, S., & Wright, R. E. (2001). Choice modeling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys,15(3), 435–462.
21. Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Koop, G. (2002). Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: Climbing in Scotland. Environmental & Resource Economics,22(3), 449–466.
22. Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 473–495). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. Kling, R., & Swygart-Hobaugh, A. J. (2002). The internet and the velocity of scholarly journal publishing. Working paper no. WP-02-12, Bloomington, IN: Rob Kling Center for Social Informatics, School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University.
24. Knight, L. V., Steinbach, T. A., & Levy, Y. (2008). Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: A comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a broad range of academic disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,3, 59–79.
25. Kwak, S.-Y., Yoo, S.-H., & Kwak, S.-J. (2010). Valuing energy-saving measures in residential buildings: A choice experiment study. Energy Policy,38(1), 673–677.
26. Leyman, A., Vandevelde, K., Van Rossem, R., & Groenvynck, H. (2011). Senior onderzoekers aan het woord. [Senior researchers’ opinions]. Ghent: Human Researchers in Research.
27. List, J. A., & Shogren, J. F. (1999). Price information and bidding behavior in repeated second—price auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,81, 942–949.
28. Louviere, J. J., & Hensher, D. A. (1982). On the design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modeling. Transportation Research Record,890, 11–17.
29. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Louviere, J. J., & Woodworth, G. (1983). Design and analysis of stimulated choice experiments or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research,20, 350–367.
31. Luukkonen, T. (1992). Is scientists’ publishing behavior reward seeking? Scientometrics,24, 297–319.
32. Luwel, M., & Moed, H. F. (1998). Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics,41(1–2), 29–40.
33. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN 1-4020-3713-9.
34. Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., & Rowlands, I. (2006). On the tips of their tongues: Authors and their views on scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing,19(3), 193–203.
35. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management,12(5), 297–312.
36. Rousseau, R. (2002). Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues. Library Trends,50(3), 418–439.
37. Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2012). Interactions between journal attributes and authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(6), 1213–1225.
38. Rousseau, S., & Vranken, L. (2013). Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: Evidence for labeled organic food products. Food Policy,40, 31–43.
39. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., Booij, M., & Verckens, J.P. (2011). Methoden en technieken van onderzoek. [Research methods and techniques]. Amsterdam: Pearson Education Benelux.
40. Schaffner, A. (2002). Swiss Medical Weekly—one year at sea after major overhaul. Swiss Medical Weekly,132(3), 3.
41. Søreide, K., & Winter, D. C. (2010). Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission. Surgery,147(4), 475–480.
42. Stock, W. G. (2009). The inflation of impact factors of scientific journals. ChemPhysChem,10, 2193–2196.
43. Street, D. J., Burgess, L., & Louviere, J. J. (2005). Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing,22, 459–470.
44. Thompson, P. J. (2007). How to choose the right journal for your manuscript. Chest,132, 1073–1076.
45. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2011). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics,5(1), 37–47.
46. Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics,62(1), 117–131.
47. Yu, G., Yu, D., & Li, Y. (2004). The universal expression of periodical average publication delay at steady state. Scientometrics,60(2), 121–129.
48. Ziobrowski, A. J., & Gibler, K. M. (2000). Factors academic real estate authors consider when choosing where to submit a manuscript for publication. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education,3, 43–54.