DNA fragmentation in human sperm after magnetic-activated cell sorting

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 147-154

  Bucar, Sara ^a,b   Gonçalves, Ana ^a   Rocha, Eduardo ^a   Barros, Alberto ^a,c   Sousa, Mário ^a   Sá, Rosália ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^c Centre for Reproductive Genetics Prof Alberto Barros ^*  (Portugal)

Author keywords

Apoptosis; DNA fragmentation; MACS; Sperm; TUNEL

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTHENOSPERMIA; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SELECTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAGNETIC ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON ABNORMALITY; SPERMATOZOON HEAD; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOON TAIL; TUNEL ASSAY; CELL SEPARATION; GENETICS; MAGNETISM; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERMATOZOON;

ADULT; ASTHENOZOOSPERMIA; CELL SEPARATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MALE; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 84922073562     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0370-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
2. Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):629–34. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024.
3. ASRM. Effectiveness and treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5 Suppl 1):S111–4. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1475.
4. Zinaman MJ, Brown CC, Selevan SG, Clegg ED. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. J Androl. 2000;21(1):145–53. doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03284.x.
5. Aitken RJ. Sperm function tests and fertility. Int J Androl. 2006;29(1):69–75. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00630.x. discussion 105–8.
6. Chohan KR, Griffin JT, Lafromboise M, De Jonge CJ, Carrell DT. Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm. J Androl. 2006;27(1):53–9. doi:10.2164/jandrol.05068.
7. Delbes G, Hales BF, Robaire B. Toxicants and human sperm chromatin integrity. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(1):14–22. doi:10.1093/molehr/gap087.
8. Simon L, Proutski I, Stevenson M, Jennings D, McManus J, Lutton D, et al. Sperm DNA damage has a negative association with live-birth rates after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(1):68–78. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.019.
9. Henkel R, Kierspel E, Hajimohammad M, Stalf T, Hoogendijk C, Mehnert C, et al. DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa and assisted reproduction technology. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(4):477–84.
10. Benchaib M, Lornage J, Mazoyer C, Lejeune H, Salle B, Francois GJ. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):93–100. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.057.
11. Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1289–95. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063.
12. Lin MH, Kuo-Kuang Lee R, Li SH, Lu CH, Sun FJ, Hwu YM. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(2):352–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.018.
13. Tavalaee M, Razavi S, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Influence of sperm chromatin anomalies on assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4):1119–26. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.063.
14. Henkel R. Sperm preparation: state-of-the-art–physiological aspects and application of advanced sperm preparation methods. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(2):260–9. doi:10.1038/aja.2011.133.
15. Boitrelle F, Guthauser B, Alter L, Bailly M, Bergere M, Wainer R, et al. High-magnification selection of spermatozoa prior to oocyte injection: confirmed and potential indications. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(1):6–13. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.019.
16. Kheirollahi-Kouhestani M, Razavi S, Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Mardani M, Moshtaghian J, et al. Selection of sperm based on combined density gradient and Zeta method may improve ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(10):2409–16. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep088.
17. Fleming SD, Ilad RS, Griffin AM, Wu Y, Ong KJ, Smith HC, et al. Prospective controlled trial of an electrophoretic method of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction: comparison with density gradient centrifugation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(12):2646–51. doi:10.1093/humrep/den330.
18. Tarozzi N, Nadalini M, Bizzaro D, Serrao L, Fava L, Scaravelli G, et al. Sperm-hyaluronan-binding assay: clinical value in conventional IVF under Italian law. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 3:35–43.
19. Almeida C, Sousa M, Barros A. Phosphatidylserine translocation in human spermatozoa from impaired spermatogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(6):770–7.
20. Grunewald S, Paasch U. Sperm selection for ICSI using annexin V. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:257–62. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_23.
21. Said TM, Grunewald S, Paasch U, Glander HJ, Baumann T, Kriegel C, et al. Advantage of combining magnetic cell separation with sperm preparation techniques. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10(6):740–6.
22. Delbes G, Herrero MB, Troeung ET, Chan PT. The use of complimentary assays to evaluate the enrichment of human sperm quality in asthenoteratozoospermic and teratozoospermic samples processed with Annexin-V magnetic activated cell sorting. Andrology. 2013;1(5):698–706. doi:10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00106.x.
23. Vendrell X, Ferrer M, Garcia-Mengual E, Munoz P, Trivino JC, Calatayud C, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, apoptotic markers and DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa from normozoospermic patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(4):492–502. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.001.
24. Gil M, Sar-Shalom V, Melendez Sivira Y, Carreras R, Checa MA. Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(4):479–85. doi:10.1007/s10815-013-9962-8.
25. Sheikhi A, Jalali M, Gholamian M, Jafarzadeh A, Jannati S, Mousavifar N. Elimination of apoptotic spermatozoa by magnetic-activated cell sorting improves the fertilization rate of couples treated with ICSI procedure. Androl. 2013;1(6):845–9. doi:10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00140.x.
26. Rawe VY, Boudri HU, Alvarez Sedo C, Carro M, Papier S, Nodar F. Healthy baby born after reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation using cell sorting before ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(3):320–3. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.12.004.
27. Polakde Fried E, Denaday F. Single and twin ongoing pregnancies in two cases of previous ART failure after ICSI performed with sperm sorted using annexin V microbeads. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):351.e15–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.037.
28. Herrero MB, Delbes G, Chung JT, Son WY, Holzer H, Buckett W, et al. Case report: the use of annexin V coupled with magnetic activated cell sorting in cryopreserved spermatozoa from a male cancer survivor: healthy twin newborns after two previous ICSI failures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(11):1415–9. doi:10.1007/s10815-013-0086-y.
29. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
30. Lee TH, Liu CH, Shih YT, Tsao HM, Huang CC, Chen HH, et al. Magnetic-activated cell sorting for sperm preparation reduces spermatozoa with apoptotic markers and improves the acrosome reaction in couples with unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(4):839–46. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq009.
31. Said T, Agarwal A, Grunewald S, Rasch M, Baumann T, Kriegel C, et al. Selection of nonapoptotic spermatozoa as a new tool for enhancing assisted reproduction outcomes: an in vitro model. Biol Reprod. 2006;74(3):530–7. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.105.046607.
32. Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Arbabian M, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Density gradient centrifugation before or after magnetic-activated cell sorting: which technique is more useful for clinical sperm selection? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(1):31–8. doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9686-6.
33. Oehninger S, Acosta R, Morshedi M, Philput C, Swanson RJ, Acosta AA. Relationship between morphology and motion characteristics of human spermatozoa in semen and in the swim-up sperm fractions. J Androl. 1990;11(5):446–52. doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.1990.tb00174.x.
34. Lachaud C, Tesarik J, Canadas ML, Mendoza C. Apoptosis and necrosis in human ejaculated spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(3):607–10. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh130.
35. de Vantery AC, Lucas H, Chardonnens D, de Agostini A. Removal of spermatozoa with externalized phosphatidylserine from sperm preparation in human assisted medical procreation: effects on viability, motility and mitochondrial membrane potential. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:1. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-7-1.
36. Zahedi A, Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Azadi L, Fazilati M, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Zeta potential vs apoptotic marker: which is more suitable for ICSI sperm selection? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(9):1181–6. doi:10.1007/s10815-013-0022-1.