Erratum to: What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban parks?[Landscape Ecol, 30,(2015), 153–165, 10.1007/s10980-014-0113-0];What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban parks?

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 153-165

  Shanahan, D F ^a   Lin, B B ^b   Gaston, K J ^c   Bush, R ^a   Fuller, R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Nature relatedness scale; Recreational ecosystem services; Remnant vegetation cover; Tree cover; Urban green space

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922073321     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0162-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (85)

1. Aldous DE (2007) Social, environmental, economic, and health benefits of green spaces. In: Lumpkin TA, Warrington IJ (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Horticultural Plants in Urban and Peri-Urban Life, Acta Horticulture, 762. International Society Horticultural Science, Leuven 1, pp 171–185
2. Armston JD, Denham RJ, Danaher TJ, Scarth PF, Moffiet TN (2009) Prediction and validation of foliage projective cover from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery. J Appl Remote Sens 3:033540
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008) Information paper: an introduction to socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA). Australian Government, Canberra
4. Bai H, Stanis SAW, Kaczynski AT, Besenyi GM (2013) Perceptions of neighborhood park quality: associations with physical activity and body mass index. Ann Behav Med 45:S39–S48
5. Baur JWR, Tynon JF (2010) Small-scale urban nature parks: why should we care? Leis Sci 32(2):195–200
6. Beil K, Hanes D (2013) The influence of urban natural and built environments on physiological and psychological measures of stress: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 10(4):1250–1267
7. Bekessy SA, White M, Gordon A, Moilanen A, McCarthy MA, Wintle BA (2012) Transparent planning for biodiversity and development in the urban fringe. Landsc Urb Plan 108(2–4):140–149
8. Bigirimana J, Bogaert J, De Canniere C, Lejoly J, Parmentier I (2011) Alien plant species dominate the vegetation in a city of Sub-Saharan Africa. Landsc Urb Plan 100(3):251–267
9. Bixler RD, Floyd MF (1997) Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable. Environ Behav 29:443–467
10. Bjerke T, Østdahl T, Thrane C, Strumse E (2006) Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urb For Urb Green 5:35–44
11. Bodin M, Hartig T (2001) Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running? Psychol Sport Exerc 4:141–153
12. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29(2):293–301
13. Brady MJ, McAlpine CA, Miller CJ, Possingham HP, Baxter GS (2011) Mammal responses to matrix development intensity. Aust Ecol 36(1):35–45
14. Branas CC, Cheney RA, MacDonald JM, Tam VW, Jackson TD, Ten Have TR (2011) A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. Am J Epidemiol 174(11):1296–1306
15. Brisbane City Council (2013) Part 6 zones: draft city plan. Brisbane City Council, Brisbane
16. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York
17. Catterall CP (2009) Responses of faunal assemblages to urbanisation: global research paradigms and an avian case study. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–155
18. Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc Urb Plan 69:129–139
19. Clarke LW, Jenerette GD, Davila A (2013) The luxury of vegetation and the legacy of tree biodiversity in Los Angeles, CA. Landsc Urb Plan 116:48–59
20. Cohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, Derose KP, Martinez H, Setodji C, McKenzie TL (2010) Parks and physical activity: why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med 50(Supplement(0)):S9–S12
21. Crawford D, Timperio A, Giles-Corti B, Ball K, Hume C, Roberts R, Andrianopoulos N, Salmon J (2008) Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status? Health Place 14(4):889–893
22. Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human wellbeing and species richness. Bioscience 62(1):47–55
23. Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2012) The influence of landscape context on the distribution of flightless mammals in exurban developments. Landsc Urb Plan 104(1):114–123
24. Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24(2):432–440
25. England Natural (2010) ‘Nature Nearby’: accessible natural greenspace guidance. Natural England, London
26. Ferre´ M, Guitart A, Ferret M (2006) Children and playgrounds in Mediterranean cities. Child Geogr 4:173–183
27. Forsyth A, Musacchio L (2005) Designing small parks: a manual for addressing social and ecological concerns. Wiley, New York
28. Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3(4):390–394
29. Garden J, McAlpine C, Peterson A, Jones D, Possingham H (2006) Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: a focus on spatially explicit processes. Aust Ecol 31(2):126–148
30. Giles-Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, Collins K, Douglas K, Ng K, Lange A, Donovan RJ (2005) Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? Am J Prev Med 28(2):169–176
31. Han K (2009) Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the psychology, behaviour, and health of students at a junior high school in Taiwan. Environ Behav 41:658–692
32. Hartig T (2008) Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequality. Lancet 372(9650):1614–1615
33. Hauru K, Niemi A, Lehvavirta S (2012) Spatial distribution of saplings in heavily worn urban forests: implications for regeneration and management. Urb For Urb Green 11(3):279–289
34. Heynen N, Perkins HA, Roy P (2006) The political ecology of uneven urban green space: the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urb Aff Rev 42(1):3–25
35. Ho CH, Sasidharan V, Elmendorf W, Willits FK, Graefe A, Godbey G (2005) Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation, and perceived benefits. J Leis Res 37(3):281–306
36. Home R, Hunziker M, Bauer N (2012) Psychosocial outcomes as motivations for visiting nearby urban green spaces. Leis Sci 34(4):350–365
37. Irvine KN, Fuller RA, Devine-Wright P, Tratalos J, Payne SR, Warren PH, Lomas KJ, Gaston KJ (2010) Ecological and psychological value of urban green space. Dimensions of the sustainable city. Springer, London, pp 215–237
38. Irvine KN, Warber SL, Devine-Wright P, Gaston KJ (2013) Understanding urban green space as a health resource: a qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in Sheffield, UK. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 10(1):417–442
39. Jackson LE (2003) The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landsc Urb Plan 64(4):191–200
40. Jim CY, Shan XZ (2013) Socioeconomic effect on perception of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China. Cities 31:123–131
41. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. Kazmierczak A (2013) The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landsc Urb Plan 109(1):31–44
43. Keniger LE, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, Fuller RA (2013) What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Pub Health 10(3):913–935
44. Landry SM, Chakraborty J (2009) Street trees and equity: evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environ Plan A 41(11):2651–2670
45. Lin BB, Fuller RA, Bush R, Gaston KJ, Shanahan DF (2014) Opportunity or orientation?: who uses parks and why. PLoS One 9(1):e87422
46. Lovasi GS, Quinn JW, Neckerman KM, Perzanowski MS, Rundle A (2008) Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma. J Epidemiol Community Health 62(7):647–649
47. Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health 60(7):587–592
48. Matteson KC, Grace JB, Minor ES (2013) Direct and indirect effects of land use on floral resources and flower-visiting insects across an urban landscape. Oikos 122(5):682–694
49. McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D (2010) Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health Place 16(4):712–726
50. Mitchell R, Popham F (2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372(9650):1655–1660
51. Moxham C, Turner V (2011) The effect of fragmentation on the threatened plant community Coastal Moonah Woodland in Victoria, Australia. Urb Ecosyst 14(4):569–583
52. Newton PW, Baum S, Bhatia K, Brown SK, Cameron S, Fran B, Grant T, Mak SL, Neate K, Smith NC, Stimson R, Pears A, Tucker S, Yencken D (2001) Human settlements theme, Australia state of the environment report 2001. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra
53. Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA (2009) The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ Behav 41(5):715–740
54. Parsons R (1995) Conflict between ecological sustainability and environmental aesthetics: conundrum, canard or curiosity. Landsc Urb Plan 32:227–244
55. Peschardt KK, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter UK (2012) Use of small public urban green spaces (SPUGS). Urb For Urb Green 11(3):235–244
56. Pham T-T-H, Apparicio P, Seguin A-M, Landry S, Gagnon M (2012) Spatial distribution of vegetation in Montreal: an uneven distribution or environmental inequity? Landsc Urb Plan 107(3):214–224
57. Piper SD, Catterall CP (2003) A particular case and a general pattern: hyperaggressive behaviour by one species may mediate avifaunal decreases in fragmented Australian forests. Oikos 101(3):602–614
58. Pleson E, Nieuwendyk LM, Lee KK, Chaddah A, Nykiforuk CIJ, Schopflocher D (2014) Understanding Older Adults’ usage of community green spaces in Taipei, Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 11(2):1444–1464
59. R Core Team (2012) R: as language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
60. Sandström UG Urban green spaces for human wellbeing. In: Impact Assessment and Human Wellbeing, 29th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Ghana 2009. International Association for Impact Assessment, Ghana
61. Sattler PS, Williams R (1999) The conservation status of Queensland’s bioregional ecosystems. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane
62. Shanahan DF, Miller C, Possingham HP, Fuller RA (2011a) The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biol Conserv 144(2):722–729
63. Shanahan DF, Possingham HP, Martin TG (2011b) Foraging height and landscape context predict the relative abundance of bird species in urban vegetation patches. Aust Ecol 36(8):944–953
64. Shanahan DF, Lin BB, Gaston K, Bush R, Fuller RA (2014) Socio-economic inequalities in access to nature on public and private lands: a case study from Brisbane, Australia. Landsc Urb Plan 130:14
65. Shinew KJ, Glover TD, Parry DC (2004) Leisure spaces as potential sites for interracial interaction: community gardens in urban areas. J Leis Res 36:336–355
66. Sikorski P, Szumacher I, Sikorska D, Kozak M, Wierzba M (2013) Effects of visitor pressure on understory vegetation in Warsaw forested parks (Poland). Environ Monit Assess 185(7):5823–5836
67. Stagoll K, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning AD (2012) Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conserv Lett 5(2):115–122
68. Standish RJ, Hobbs RJ, Miller JR (2013) Improving city life: options for ecological restoration in urban landscapes and how these might influence interactions between people and nature. Landscape Ecol 28(6):1213–1221
69. Strohbach M, Haase D, Kabisch N (2009) Birds and the city: urban biodiversity, land use, and socioeconomics. Ecol Soc 14(2):31
70. Strohbach MW, Lerman SB, Warren PS (2013) Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landsc Urb Plan 114:69–79
71. Sugiyama T, Francis J, Middleton NJ, Owen N, Giles-Corti B (2010) Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. Am J Pub Health 100(9):1752–1757
72. Thompson CW (2013) Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. J Environ Psychol 34:79–96
73. Troy A, Grove JM, O’Neil-Dunne J (2012) The relationship between tree canopy and crime rates across an urban-rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landsc Urb Plan 106(3):262–270
74. Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urb Plan 81(3):167–178
75. Ulrich RS (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421
76. UN-Habitat (2013) State of the world’s cities, 2012/2013: prosperity of cities, New York
77. van Dillen SME, de Vries S, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P (2012) Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents’ health: adding quality to quantity. J Epidemiol Community Health 66(6):e8
78. van Heezik Y, Freeman C, Porter S, Dickinson KJM (2013) Garden size, householder knowledge, and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems 16(8):1442–1454
79. Wells NM, Lekies KS (2006) Nature and the life course: pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Child Youth Environ 16(1):1–24
80. Wende HEW, Zarger RK, Mihelcic JR (2012) Accessibility and usability: green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landsc Urb Plan 107(3):272–282
81. White MP, Pahl S, Ashbullby K, Herbert S, Depledge MH (2013) Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. J Environ Psychol 35:40–51
82. Wu JG (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human wellbeing in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol 28(6):999–1023
83. Wu JG (2014) Urban ecology and sustainability: the state-of-the-science and future directions. Landsc Urb Plan 125:209–221
84. Zanon D, Doucouliagos C, Hall J, Lockstone-Binney L (2013) Constraints to Park Visitation: a meta-analysis of North American studies. Leis Sci 35(5):475–493
85. Zhou DQ, Chu LM (2012) How would size, age, human disturbance, and vegetation structure affect bird communities of urban parks in different seasons? J Ornithol 153(4):1101–1112