Growth and division in a dynamic protocell model

Life

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 837-864

  Villani, Marco ^a,b   Filisetti, Alessandro ^b   Graudenzi, Alex ^c   Damiani, Chiara ^c   Carletti, Timoteo ^d   Serra, Roberto ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^d University of Namur   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Artificial chemistries; Collectively replicating chemical systems; Dynamical models; Emergence of novelties; Evolvability; Protocell; Synchronization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922041594     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20751729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/life4040837     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Rasmussen, S.; Chen, L.; Deamer, D.; Krakauer, D.C.; Packard, N.H.; Stadler, P.F.; Bedau, M.A. Transitions from nonliving to living matter. Science 2004, 303, 963-965.
2. Rasmussen, S., Bedau, M.A., Chen, L., Deamer, D., Krakauer, D.C., Packard, N.H., Stadler, P.F., Eds. Protocells: Bridging Nonliving and Living Matter; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2008.
3. Solé, R.V.; Munteanu, A.; Rodriguez-Caso, C.; Macía, J. Synthetic protocell biology: From reproduction to computation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 362, 1727-1739.
4. Carletti, T.; Serra, R.; Villani, M.; Poli, I.; Filisetti, A. Sufficient conditions for emergent synchronization in protocell models. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 254, 741-751.
5. Filisetti, A.; Serra, R.; Carletti, T.; Villani, M.; Poli, I. Non-linear protocell models: Synchronization and chaos. Eur. Phys. J. B 2010, 77, 249-256.
6. Ganti, T. Chemoton Theory, 3rd ed.; Kluwer Academic: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
7. Luisi, P.L.; Ferri, F.; Stano, P. Approaches to semi-synthetic minimal cells: A review. Naturwissenschaften 2006, 93, 1-13
8. Mansy, S.S.; Schrum, J.P.; Krishnamurthy, M.; Tobé, S.; Treco, D.A.; Szostak, J.W. Template-directed synthesis of a genetic polymer in a model protocell. Nature 2008, 454, 122-125.
9. Morowitz, H.J.; Heinz, B.; Deamer, D.W. The chemical logic of a minimum protocell. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1988, 18, 281-287.
10. Munteanu, A.; Solé, R.V. Phenotypic diversity and chaos in a minimal cell model. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 240, 434-442.
11. Rasmussen, S.; Chen, L.; Nilsson, M.; Abe, S. Bridging nonliving and living matter. Artif. Life 2003, 9, 269-316.
12. Rocheleau, T.; Rasmussen, S.; Nielsen, P.E.; Jacobi, M.N. Emergence of protocellular growth laws. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 362, 1841-1845.
13. Segrè, D.; Lancet, D. Composing life. EMBO Rep. 2000, 1, 217-222, doi:10.1093/embo-reports/ kvd063.
14. Stano, P.; Luisi, L.P. Achievements and open questions in the self-reproduction of vesicles and synthetic minimal cells. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3639-3653.
15. Szostak, J.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Luisi, P.L. Synthesizing life. Nature 2001, 409, 387-390.
16. Hanczyc, M.M.; Szostak, J.W. Replicating vesicles as models of primitive cell growth and division. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 660-664.
17. Vasas, V.; Fernando, C.; Santos, M.; Kauffman, S.A.; Szathmary, E. Evolution before genes. Biol. Direct 2012, 7, 217-222, doi:10.1186/1745-6150-7-1.
18. Solé, R.V.; Macía, J.; Fellermann, H.; Munteanu, A.; Sardanyés, J.; Valverde, S. Models of Protocell Replication; In Protocells: Bridging Nonliving and Living Matter; Rasmussen, S., Bedau, M.A., Chen, L., Deamer, D., Krakauer, D.C., Packard, N.H., Stadler, P.F., Eds.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 2008.
19. This is of course an approximate description of the actual process of vesicle fission: the daughter cells may be of different size and, perhaps more important, the breakup is a complex process and it does not always take place at a fixed size. However, for modeling purposes, we will first consider the simplest version, and we will postpone to further works the consideration of fluctuations in the size of the daughter cells and in the value of the threshold on the parent cell volume that leads to fission.
20. Serra, R.; Carletti, T.; Poli, I. Synchronization phenomena in surface-reaction models of protocells. Artif. Life 2007, 123, 123-138.
21. Wagner, N.; Ashkenasy, G. Symmetry and order in systems chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 164907.
22. Sievers, D.; von Kiedrowski, G. Self-replication of complementary nucleotide-based oligomers. Nature 1994, 369, 221-224.
23. Mansy, S.S. Model protocells from single-chain lipids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 835-843.
24. Segre, D.; Lancet, D.; Kedem, O.; Pilpel, Y. Graded autocatalysis replication domain (GARD): Kinetic analysis of self-replication in mutually catalytic sets. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1988, 28, 501-514.
25. Kauffman, S.A. Autocatalytic sets of proteins. J. Theor. Biol. 1986, 119, 1-24.
26. Filisetti, A.; Graudenzi, A.; Serra, R.; Villani, M.; Fuchslin, R.M.; Packard, N.; Kauffman, S.A.; Poli, I. A stochastic model of autocatalytic reaction networks. Theory Biosci. 2011, 131, 85-93.
27. Carletti, T.; Filisetti, A. The stochastic evolution of a protocell: The Gillespie algorithm in a dynamically varying volume. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2012, 2012, Article ID 423627.
28. Gillespie, D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 2340-2361.
29. Filisetti, A.; Graudenzi, A.; Damiani, C.; Villani, M.; Roberto, S. The Role of Backward Reactions in a Stochastic Model of Catalytic Reaction Networks. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL2013), Taormina, Italy, 2-6 September 2013; Liò, P., Miglino, O., Nicosia, G., Nolfi, S., Pavone, M., Eds.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013.
30. Filisetti, A.; Graudenzi, A.; Roberto, S.; Villani, M.; de Lucrezia, D.; Poli, I. The Role of Energy in a Stochastic Model of the Emergence of Autocatalytic Sets. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL2011), Paris, France, 8-12 August 2011; Lenaerts, T., Giacobini, M., Bersini, H., Bourgine, P., Dorigo, M., Doursat, R., Eds.; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 227-234.
31. Serra, R.; Filisetti, A.; Villani, M.; Graudenzi, A.; Damiani, C.; Panini, T. A stochastic model of catalytic reaction networks in protocells. Nat. Comput. 2014, 13, 367-377.
32. In that paper we assumed that a semipermeable membrane exists, and that some chemical species can cross the membrane (leading to an instantaneous equilibrium between the internal and external chemical potential of those species) ,while for others crossing is prohibited.
33. If R is the set of all possible reactions, a RAF set is defined as a subset R' ⊆ R of reactions in which: (i) each reaction r ∈ R' is catalyzed by at least one molecule type involved in R' and (ii) all reactants and catalysts in R' can be created from the species whose presence is guaranteed (the so-called food set F) by using reactions only from R' itself. See Section 3 for more details.
34. Hordijk, W.; Steel, M. Detecting autocatalytic, self-sustaining sets in chemical reaction systems. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 227, 451-461.
35. The presence of a RAF set in this type of model of chemical reactions plays a role analogous to that of the presence of an eigenvalue with a positive real part in the case of linear kinetic equations discussed in [4].
36. Markovitch, O.; Lancet, D. Multispecies population dynamics of prebiotic compositional assemblies. J. Theor. Biol. 2014, 357, 26-34.
37. If not differently indicated in this article, all the kinetic constants of the same kind are set to the same value (see Appendix A for the details); note, however, that the structure of the relationships among RAFs, membranes and protocell growth does not depend on the particular values of these parameters (whereas, of course, these parameters determine the rates of the phenomena).
38. Gillespie, D.T. A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions. J. Comput. Phys. 1976, 22, 403-434.
39. Bagley, R.J.; Farmer, J.D. Spontaneous Emergence of a Metabolism. In Artificial Life II; Series Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity; Langton, H.G., Taylor, C., Farmer, J.D., Rasmussen, S., Eds.; Addison-Wesley: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1991; pp. 227-234.
40. Stadler, P.F.; Schuster, P. Dynamics of small autocatalytic reaction networks-I. Bifurcations, permanence and exclusion. Bull. Math. Biol. 1990, 52, 485-508.
41. Stadler, P.F. Dynamics of autocatalytic reaction networks. IV: Inhomogeneous replicator networks. Biosystems 1991, 26, 1-19.
42. Stadler, P.F.; Schnabl, W.; Forst, C.; Schuster, P. Dynamics of small autocatalytic reaction networks II replication, mutation and catalysis. Bull. Math. Biol. 1995, 57, 21-61.
43. Jain, S.; Krishna, S. A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in evolving networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 543-547.
44. Hordijk, W.; Fontanari, J.F. Catalytic Reaction Sets, Decay, and the Preservation of Information. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, Cambridge, MA, USA, 30 September-4 October 2003; pp. 133-138.
45. Filisetti, A.; Graudenzi, A.; Serra, R.; Villani, M.; de Lucrezia, D.; Fuchslin, R.M.; Kauffman, S.A.; Packard, N.; Poli, I. A stochastic model of the emergence of autocatalytic cycles. J. Syst. Chem. 2011, 2, doi:10.1186/1759-2208-2-2.
46. Adamala, K.; Szostak, J.W. Competition between model protocells driven by an encapsulated catalyst. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 495-501.
47. The hypothesis that the two daughters have identical volumes is a non-essential assumption, because of the supposition that the division phenomenon happens at a given threshold independent from the initial size: conversely, it allows a more compact result presentation. In any case, we checked if the hypothesis can be released without effecting the presented results (simulations not shown).
48. Farmer, J.D.; Kauffman, S.A. Autocatalytic replication of polymers. Physica D 1986, 220, 50-67.
49. Hordijk, W.; Hein, J.; Steel, M. Autocatalytic sets and the origin of life. Entropy 2010, 12, 1733-1742.
50. Dyson, F.J. Origins of Life; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1985.
51. Eigen, M.; Schuster, P. A principle of natural self-organization. Naturwissenschaften 1977, 64, 541-565.
52. Jain, S.; Krishna, S. Autocatalytic set and the growth of complexity in an evolutionary model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 81, 5684-5687.
53. Heiner, M.; Gilbert, D.; Donaldson, R. Petri Nets for Systems and Synthetic Biology in Formal Methods for Computational Systems Biology; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Bernardo, M., Degano, P., Zavattaro, G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 5016, pp. 215-264.
54. Hordijk, W.; Steel, M.; Kauffman, S.A. The structure of autocatalytic sets: Evolvability, enablement, and emergence. Acta Biotheor. 2012, 60, 379-392.
55. If R is the set of all possible reaction, a RAF set is defined as the subset R'⊆ R of reactions in which: (i) each reaction r ∈ R' is catalyzed by at least one molecule type involved in R' and (ii) all reactants and catalysts in R' can be created from the molecules whose presence is guaranteed (the so-called food set F) by using reactions only from R' itself. See [34] for a more detailed explanation.
56. It should be observed that also periodic variations in the growth and duplication rates are compatible with a viable protocell population, provided that the variations are also synchronized (a phenomenon that was called supersynchronization in [5].
57. Mavelli, F.; Ruiz-Mirazo, K. Theoretical conditions for the stationary reproduction of model protocells. Integr. Biol. 2013, 5, 324-341.
58. Plasson, R.; Brandenburg, A.; Jullien, L.; Bersini, H. Autocatalysis: At the root of self-replication. Artif. Life 2011, 17, 219-236.
59. Kaneko, K. Life: An Introduction to Complex Systems Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
60. Further novelties might be due to the interactions between different protocells, whose contents may differ (see Section 6 for a discussion on the role of heterogeneity in protocell populations). However, these novelties would be less radical than those discussed here; it has been argued that a system can be deemed truly evolvable only if it can accept some "true novelties" of the kind discussed in the text [17,27].
61. Or if it is capable to directly catalyze its own formation at a rate higher than those of the already existing ones; in this case the new irrRAF will replace the already existing ones.
62. Bird, R.B.; Stewart, W.E.; Lightfoot, E.N. Transport Phenomena; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1976.
63. Maynard Smith, J. The Problems of Biology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1986.
64. Serra, R.; Villani, M. Mechanism for the formation of density gradients through semipermeable membranes. Phys. Rev. E 2013, 87, 062814.
65. Luisi, P.L.; Allegretti, M.; Souza, T.; Steineger, F.; Fahr, A.; Stano, P. Spontaneous protein crowding in liposomes: A new vista for the origin of cellular metabolism. ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 1989-1992.
66. Maurer, S.E.; Monnard, P.A. Primitive Membrane Formation, Characteristics and Roles in the Emergent Properties of a Protocell. Entropy 2011, 13, 466-484.
67. Carletti, T.; Fanelli, D. From chemical reactions to evolution: Emergence of species. Eur. Phys. Lett. 2007, 77, doi:10.1209/0295-5075/77/18005.