The simportal fluoro-less c-Arm trainer: An innovative device for percutaneous kidney access

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 240-245

  Veneziano, Domenico ^a   Smith, Arthur ^b   Reihsen, Troy ^a   Speich, Jason ^a   Sweet, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Smith Institute for Urology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FLUOROSCOPY; FLUOROSCOPY SYSTEM; KIDNEY PELVIS; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TRAINING; TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; KIDNEY CALYX; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALICES; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS;

EID: 84922014043     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0401     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V, Vernace FM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of 500 consecutive cases. Urol Radiol 1986;8:61-66
2. Kauer PC, et al. Present practice and treatment strategies in endourological stone management. Results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 2005;48:182-188
3. Ahmed K, et al. Effectiveness of procedural simuLation in urology: A systematic review. J Urol 2011;186:26-34
4. De La Rosette J, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011;25:11-17
5. De La Rosette J, et al. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy-A critical review. Eur Urol 2008;54: 994-1003
6. Astroza G, et al. Effect of supine vs prone position on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in staghorn calculi: Results from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Study. Urology 2013;82:1240e1245
7. Shalhav AL, DabagiaMD, Wagner TT, KochMO, Lingeman JE. Training postgraduate urologists in Laparoscopic surgery: The current challenge. J Urol 2002;167:2135-2137
8. Allen D, et al. Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2005;19:279-282
9. Tanriverdi O, et al. The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;52:206-212
10. Stern J, et al. Percutaneous renal access simuLators. J Endourol 2007;21:270-273
11. Wignall GR, et al. Surgical simuLation: A urological perspective. J Urol 2008;179:1690-1699
12. Mishra S, et al. Validation of virtual reality simuLation for percutaneous renal access training. J Endourol 2010;4: 635-640
13. Jutzi S, et al. New ex vivo organ moDel for percutaneous renal surgery using a Laparoendoscopic training box: The sandwich moDel. World J Urol 2014;32:783-789
14. Bruyere F, et al. Rapid prototyping moDel for percutaneous nephrolithotomy training. J Endourol 2008;22:91-96
15. Steinberg PL, et al. Fluoroscopy-guiDed percutaneous renal access. J Endourol 2009;23:1627-1631
16. Michiel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899-906
17. MahaDevappa M. Fluoroscopy: Patient radiation exposure issues. RadioGraphics 2001;21:1033-1045
18. Mancini G, et al. Factors affecting patient radiation exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2010;184: 2373-2377
19. McDougall EM. Validation of surgical simuLators. J Endourol 2007;21:244-247.