Validation of virtual reality simulation for percutaneous renal access training

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 635-640

  Mishra, Shashikant ^a   Kurien, Abraham ^a   Patel, Rajesh ^a   Patil, Pradip ^b   Ganpule, Arvind ^a   Muthu, Veeramani ^a   Sabnis, Ravindra B ^a   Desai, Mahesh ^a  

^a MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL   (India)

^b Jayramdas Patel Academic Centre   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FLUOROSCOPY; KIDNEY BIOPSY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TRAINING; SWINE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUS SCROFA; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77951957960     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0166     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, Hanna GB. What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalida-tion? Am J Surg 2001;182:110-116.
2. Stern J, Zeltser IS, Pearle MS. Percutaneous renal access simulators. J Endourol 2007;21:270-273.
3. Mishra SK, Ganpule A, Kurien A, Muthu V, Desai MR. Task completion time: Objective tool for assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic simulator for urology trainees. Indian J Urol 2008;24:35-38.
4. Reznick RK. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 1993;165:358-361.
5. Kopta JA. An approach to the evaluation of operative skills. Surgery 1971;70:297-303.
6. Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ, McManus IC, Darzi A. Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: Results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST-VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998;50:124-130.
7. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill. Ann Surg 2004;240:374-381.
8. Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK, et al. Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 1999;177:167-170.
9. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:458-464.
10. Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF. A new approach to urology training: A laboratory model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2004;172(5 Pt 1):1950-1952.
11. Strohmaier WL, Giese A. Ex vivo training model for percutaneous renal surgery. Urol Res 2005;33:191-193.
12. Häcker A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honeck P, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T. A biological model to teach percutaneous ne-phrolithotomy technique with ultrasound-and fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol 2007;21:545-550.
13. Matsumoto ED. Low-fidelity ureteroscopy models. J Endourol 2007;21:248-281.
14. Knudsen BE, Matsumoto ED, Chew BH, et al. A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: Phase I. J Urol 2006;176:2173-2178.
15. Margulis V, Matsumoto ED, Knudsen BE, Chew BH, Pautler SE, Cadeddu JA, Denstedt JD, Pearle MS. Percutaneous renal collecting system access: Can virtual reality shorten the learning curve? [abstract] J Urol 2005;173(Suppl): 315.
16. Park S, Matsumoto ED, Knudsen BE, et al. Face, content and construct validity testing on a percutaneous renal access simulator. J Endourol 2006.
17. Guillonneau B. Should we consider testing for skill in surgery? Eur Urol 2005;47:480-481.