The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 11-17

  De La Rosette, Jean ^a   Assimos, Dean ^b   Desai, Mahesh ^c   Gutierrez, Jorge ^d   Lingeman, James ^e   Scarpa, Roberto ^f   Tefekli, Ahmet ^g  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL   (India)

^d HOSPITAL CIVIL DE GUADALAJARA FRAY ANTONIO ALCALDE   (Mexico)

^e METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f Clinica Urologica Università di Torino   (Italy)

^g HASEKI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; ENDOUROLOGY; FEMALE; FEVER; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYDROTHORAX; KIDNEY CALYX; KIDNEY RUPTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL PELVIS PERFORATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY MASS INDEX; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; INFANT; INTERNATIONALITY; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951618981     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0424     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy-a critical review. Eur Urol 2008;54:994-1001.
2. Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A. Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones? Curr Opin Urol 2006;16:106-111. (Pubitemid 43964570)
3. Samplaski MK, Irwin BH, Desai M. Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters. Cleve Clin J Med 2009;76:592-598.
4. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10: 257-259. (Pubitemid 8001412)
5. Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy. Eur Urol 2005;47:22-28. (Pubitemid 39575714)
6. Morris DS, Wie JT, Taub DA, et al. Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2006;175: 1731-1736.
7. Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: Experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 2005;96: 875-878. (Pubitemid 41391400)
8. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899-906. (Pubitemid 46281422)
9. Al-Bareeq R, Denstedt JD. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of lower pole renal calculi. Can Urol Assoc J 2008;2:628-630.
10. Miller NL, Lingeman JE. Management of kidney stones. BMJ 2007;334:468-472. (Pubitemid 46586605)
11. Lashley DB, Fuchs EF. Urologist-acquired renal access for percutaneous renal surgery. Urology 1998;51:927-931. (Pubitemid 28240850)
12. El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, Mohsen T, et al. Renal access by urologist or radiologist for percutaneous nephrolithotomy- is it still an issue? J Urol 2007;178:916-920. (Pubitemid 47211057)
13. Kauer PC, Laguna MP, Alivizatos G, et al. Present practice and treatment strategies in endourological stone management: Results of a survey of the European Society of Urotechnology (ESUT). Eur Urol 2005;48:182-188. (Pubitemid 40957085)
14. de la Rosette J. A platform for global endourological research. J Endourol 2009;23:1551-1553.
15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213. (Pubitemid 38963009)
16. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: Looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008;53:184-190. (Pubitemid 350166715)
17. Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2007;21:684-687. (Pubitemid 47311405)
18. de la Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, et al. Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: A multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol 2008;180:2489-2493.
19. Meinbach DS, Modling D. Percutaneous management of large renal stones in a private practice community setting. J Endourol 2008;22:447-451. (Pubitemid 351430713)
20. Soucy F, Ko R, Duvdevani M, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: A single center's experience over 15 years. J Endourol 2009;23:1669-1673.
21. Yates DR, Safdar RK, Spencer PA, Parys BT. 'Nephrostomyfree' percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Experience in a UK district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009;91: 570-577.
22. Turna B, Nazli O, Demiryoguran S, Mammadov R, Cal C. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Variables that influence hemorrhage. Urology 2007;69:603-607. (Pubitemid 46574915)
23. Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:229-234. (Pubitemid 351317397)
24. Desai M, Jain P, Ganpule A, et al. Developments in technique and technology: The effect on the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi. BJU Int 2009; 104:542-548.