Validation of multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of cleavage-stage embryos

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1685-1691

  Huang, Jin ^a,c   Yan, Liying ^a,c   Fan, Wei ^b   Zhao, Nan ^a   Zhang, Yan ^a,c   Tang, Fuchou ^b   Xie, X Sunney ^b,d   Qiao, Jie ^a,c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

24 chromosome aneuploidy screening; Cleavage embryo; Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH); Multiple annealing and looping based amplification cycles (MALBAC); Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Indexed keywords

24 CHROMOSOME ANEUPLOIDY; ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; BLASTOMA; CASE REPORT; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DELIVERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIPLE ANNEALING AND LOOPING BASED AMPLIFICATION CYCLE SEQUENCING; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEX CHROMOSOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VALIDATION STUDY; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOMERES; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84921971016     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rius M, Daina G, Obradors A, Ramos L, Velilla E, Fernandez S, et al. Comprehensive embryo analysis of advanced maternal age-related aneuploidies and mosaicism by short comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril 2011;95:413-6.
2. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Levy B, Scott RT Jr. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2017-21.
3. Scott RT Jr, Ferry K, Su J, Tao X, Scott K, Treff NR. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril 2012;97:870-5.
4. Munné S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995;64:382-91.
5. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Velilla E, Walmsley R, Sadowy S, et al. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:91-7.
6. Treff NR, Fedick A, Tao X, Devkota B, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1377-84.
7. Yu H, Wei F, Liying Y, Rong L, Ying L, Jin H, et al. Genome analyses of single human oocytes. Cell 2013;155:1492-506.
8. Lu S, Zong C, Fan W, Yang M, Li J, Chapman AR, et al. Probing meiotic recombination and aneuploidy of single sperm cells by whole-genome sequencing. Science 2012;338:1627-30.
9. Zong C, Lu S, Chapman AR, Xie XS. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell. Science 2012;338:1622-6.
10. Tobler KJ, Brezina PR, Benner AT, Du L, Xu X, Kearns WG. Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31:843-50.
11. Mertzanidou A, Wilton L, Cheng J, Spits C, Vanneste E, Moreau Y, et al. Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Hum Reprod 2013;28:256-64.
12. Capalbo A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, Baldi M, Colamaria S, et al. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development. Hum Reprod 2013;28:509-18.
13. Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 2000;6:1055-62.
14. Malmgren H, Sahlén S, Inzunza J, Aho M, Rosenlund B, Fridström M, et al. Single cell CGH analysis reveals a high degree of mosaicism in human embryos from patients with balanced structural chromosome aberrations. Mol Hum Reprod 2002;8:502-10.
15. Christopikou D, Tsorva E, Economou K, Shelley P, Davies S, Mastrominas M, et al. Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod 2013;28:1426-34.
16. Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Ilkevitch Y, Verlinsky Y. Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6,733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidies. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:54-9.
17. Ni X, Zhuo M, Su Z, Duan J, Gao Y, Wang Z, et al. Reproducible copy number variation patterns among single circulating tumor cells of lung cancer patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013;110:21083-8.
18. Handyside AH. 24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies. Fertil Steril 2013;100:595-602.
19. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1066-75.
20. Rabinowitz M, Ryan A, Gemelos G, Hill M, Baner J, Cinnioglu C, et al. Origins and rates of aneuploidy in human blastomeres. Fertil Steril 2012;97:395-401.
21. Barbash-Hazan S, Frumkin T, Malcov M, Yaron Y, Cohen T, Azem F, et al. Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential. Fertil Steril 2009;92:890-6.
22. Munné S, Velilla E, Colls P, Garcia Bermudez M, Vemuri MC, Steuerwald N, et al. Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos in culture and implications for stem cell production. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1328-34.
23. Li M, DeUgarte CM, Surrey M, Danzer H, DeCherney A, Hill DL. Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1395-400.
24. Bazrgar M, Gourabi H, Valojerdi MR, Yazdi PE, Baharvand H. Self-correction of chromosomal abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2013;22:2449-56.
25. Scott KL, Hong KH, Scott RT Jr. Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril 2013;100:608-14.
26. Harton GL, Magli MC, Lundin K, Montag M, Lemmen J, Harper JC, European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group. ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group - best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod 2011;26:41-6.
27. Munné S, Chen S, Colls P, Garrisi J, Zheng X, Cekleniak N, et al. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:628-34.
28. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosome complement. Fertil Steril 2007;87:534-41.