Trait dimensionality explains widespread variation in local adaptation

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 282, Issue 1802, 2015, Pages

  MacPherson, Ailene ^a   Hohenlohe, Paul A ^a,b   Nuismer, Scott L ^a,b  

^a Department of Biological Sciences University of Idaho ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological differentiation; Ecological genetics; Gene flow; Reciprocal transplant; Species range; Transplant experiment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GENE FLOW; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RECIPROCITY;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84921957577     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1570     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kaltz O, Shykoff JA. 1998 Local adaptation in host- parasite systems. Heredity 81, 361-370. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00435.x)
2. Savolainen O, Lascoux M, Merila J. 2013 Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 807-820. (doi:10.1038/nrg3522)
3. Lucek K, Sivasundar A, Roy D, Seehausen O. 2013 Repeated and predictable patterns of ecotypic differentiation during a biological invasion: lakestream divergence in parapatric Swiss stickleback. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 2691-2709. (doi:10.1111/jeb.12267)
4. Bonneaud C, Perez-Tris J, Federici P, Chastel O, Sorci G. 2006 Major histocompatibility alleles associated with local resistance to malaria in a passerine. Evolution 60, 383-389. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01114.x)
5. Blanquart F, Gandon S, Nuismer SL. 2012 The effects of migration and drift on local adaptation to a heterogeneous environment. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 1351-1363. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02524.x)
6. Endler JA. 1973 Gene flow and population differentiation. Science 179, 243-250. (doi:10.1126/science.179.4070.243)
7. Slatkin M. 1973 Gene flow and selection in a cline. Genetics 75, 733-756.
8. Hendry AP, Day T, Taylor EB. 2001 Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests. Evolution 55, 459-466. (doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2001)0550459:pmatad]2.0.co;2)
9. Leimu R, Fischer M. 2008 A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3, e0004010. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004010)
10. Hereford J. 2009 A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am. Nat. 173, 579-588. (doi:10.1086/597611)
11. Gonzalo-Turpin H, Hazard L. 2009 Local adaptation occurs along altitudinal gradient despite the existence of gene flow in the alpine plant species Festuca eskia. J. Ecol. 97, 742-751. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01509.x)
12. Muir AP, Biek R, Thomas R, Mable BK. 2014 Local adaptation with high gene flow: temperature parameters drive adaptation to altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol. Ecol. 23, 561-574. (doi:10.1111/mec.12624)
13. Pespeni MH, Palumbi SR. 2010 The purple sea urchin genome suggests local adaptation along a latitudinal gradient despite high gene flow. Integr. Comp. Biol. 50, E136.
14. Wang L, Liu S, Zhuang Z, Guo L, Meng Z, Lin H. 2013 Population genetic studies revealed local adaptation in a high gene-flow marine fish, the small yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis). PLoS ONE 8, e0083493. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083493)
15. Tufto J. 2000 Quantitative genetic models for the balance between migration and stabilizing selection. Genet. Res. 76, 285-293. (doi:10.1017/s0016672300004742)
16. Yeaman S, Guillaume F. 2009 Predicting adaptation under migration load: the role of genetic skew. Evolution 63, 2926-2938. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00773.x)
17. Garcia-Ramos G, Kirkpatrick M. 1997 Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51, 21-28. (doi:10.2307/2410956)
18. Guillaume F. 2011 Migration-induced phenotypic divergence: the migration-selection balance of correlated traits. Evolution 65, 1723-1738. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01248.x)
19. Debarre F, Nuismer SL, Doebeli M. 2014 Multidimensional (co)evolutionary stability. Am. Nat 184, 158-171. (doi:10.1086/677137)
20. Blanquart F, Kaltz O, Nuismer SL, Gandon S. 2013 A practical guide to measuring local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1195-1205. (doi:10.1111/ele.12150)
21. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D. 2004 Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1225-1241. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x)
22. Lande R. 1979 Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402-416. (doi:10.2307/2407630)
23. Lande R. 1976 Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30, 314-334. (doi:10.2307/2407703)
24. Nuismer SL, Gomulkiewicz R, Ridenhour BJ. 2010 When is correlation coevolution? Am. Nat. 175, 525-537. (doi:10.1086/651591)
25. Yoder JB, Nuismer SL. 2010 When does coevolution promote diversification? Am. Nat. 176, 802-817. (doi:10.1086/657048)
26. Begin M, Roff DA. 2001 An analysis of G matrix variation in two closely related cricket species, Gryllus firmus and G. pennsylvanicus. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 1-13. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00258.x)
27. Guillaume F, Whitlock MC. 2007 Effects of migration on the genetic covariance matrix. Evolution 61, 2398-2409. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00193.x)
28. Arnold SJ, Buerger R, Hohenlohe PA, Ajie BC, Jones AG. 2008 Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution 62, 2451-2461. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00472.x)
29. Jones AG, Arnold SJ, Borger R. 2003 Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57, 1747-1760. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00583.x)
30. Thompson JN. 1998 Rapid evolution as an ecological process. TREE 13, 329-332. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01378-0)
31. Hohenlohe PA, Arnold SJ. 2010 Dimensionality of mate choice, sexual isolation, and speciation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16583-16588. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1003537107)
32. Kirkpatrick M. 2009 Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica 136, 271-284. (doi:10.1007/s10709-008-9302-6)
33. Turlure C, Radchuk V, Baguette M, Meijrink M, van den Burg A, WallisDeVries M, van Duinen G-J. 2013 Plant quality and local adaptation undermine relocation in a bog specialist butterfly. Ecol. Evol. 3, 244-254. (doi:10.1002/ece3.427)
34. Molina-Montenegro MA, Palma-Rojas C, Alcayaga- Olivares Y, Oses R, Corcuera LJ, Cavieres LA, Gianoli E. 2013 Ecophysiological plasticity and local differentiation help explain the invasion success of Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) in South America. Ecography 36, 718-730. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07758.x)
35. Berenos C, Ellis PA, Pilkington JG, Pemberton JM. 2014 Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3434-3451. (doi:10.1111/mec.12827)
36. Sousa V, Hey J. 2013 Understanding the origin of species with genome-scale data: modelling gene flow. Nature Rev. Genet. 14, 404-414. (doi:10.1038/nrg3446)