The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care

Medical Care

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 153-159

  Jensen, Roxanne E ^a   Rothrock, Nan E ^b   Dewitt, Esi M ^c   Spiegel, Brennan ^d,e,f   Tucker, Carole A ^g   Crane, Heidi M ^h   Forrest, Christopher B ^i,j   Patrick, Donald L ^k,l   Fredericksen, Rob ^h   Shulman, Lisa M ^m   Cella, David ^b   Crane, Paul K ^h  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Cedars Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^l Seattle Quality of Life Group   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

clinical decision making; Patient reported outcomes; quality of care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER THERAPY; CASE STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WORKFLOW; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROCEDURES; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

DATA COLLECTION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INTERNET; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84921944900     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: 15371948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000289     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2014.
2. Conway PH, Mostashari F, Clancy C. The future of quality measurement for improvement and accountability. JAMA. 2013;309:2215-2216.
3. Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:559-568.
4. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179-193.
5. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von KM. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74:511-544.
6. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, et al. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:64-78.
7. Dobscha SK, Gerrity MS, Ward MF. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve primary care provider recognition of depression. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:163-171.
8. Brown RF, Butow PN, Dunn SM, et al. Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:1273-1279.
9. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al. Health-related quality-oflife assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:3027-3034.
10. Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, et al. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology. 2000;9:203-213.
11. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient wellbeing: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:714-724.
12. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115-123.
13. Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:833-843.
14. Lohr KN, Zebrack BJ. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:99-107.
15. Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, et al. Implementing patientreported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1305-1314.
16. Rose M, Bezjak A. Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:125-136.
17. Eton DT, Beebe TJ, Hagen PT, et al. Harmonizing and consolidating the measurement of patient-reported information at health care institutions: a position statement of the Mayo Clinic. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2014;5:7-15.
18. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012;307:1583-1584.
19. Cella D, Hahn EA, Jensen SE, et al. Methodological Issues in the Selection, Administration and Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement in Health Care Settings. Commissioned Paper #1. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2012. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/n-r/Patient-Reported-Outcomes/Patient-Reported-Outcomes.aspx#t= 2&s=&p= 2%7C. Accessed May 21, 2014.
20. Deutsch A, Smith L, Gage B, et al. Patient-reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement. PRO-based Performance Measures for Healthcare Accountable Entities. Commissioned Paper #2. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2012. Available at: http://www.quality forum.org/Projects/n-r/Patient-Reported-Outcomes/Patient-Reported-Outcomes.aspx#t = 2&s =&p = 2%7C. Accessed May 21, 2014.
21. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477-2481.
22. White A, Danis M. Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. JAMA. 2013;309:2327-2328.
23. Lee TH. Care redesign-a path forward for providers. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:466-472.
24. Wasson JH, Stukel TA, Weiss JE, et al. A randomized trial of the use of patient self-assessment data to improve community practices. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2:1-10.
25. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45:S3-S11.
26. Chapman CR, Donaldson GW, Davis JJ, et al. Improving individual measurement of postoperative pain: the pain trajectory. J Pain. 2011;12:257-262.
27. Williams CA, Templin T, Mosley-Williams AD. Usability of a computerassisted interview system for the unaided self-entry of patient data in an urban rheumatology clinic. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:249-259.
28. Economics and Statistics Administration, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, US Department of Commerce. Exploring the digital nation: computer and internet use at home. 2011. Available at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/report/2011/exploring-digitalnation-computer-and-internet-use-home. Accessed May 21, 2014.
29. Buxton J, White M, Osoba D. Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:513-519.
30. Thornberry J, Bhaskar B, Krulewitch CJ, et al. Audio computerized selfreport interview use in prenatal clinics: audio computer-assisted self interview with touch screen to detect alcohol consumption in pregnant women: application of a new technology to an old problem. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20:46-52.
31. Hays RD, Lipscomb J. Next steps for use of item response theory in the assessment of health outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(suppl 1):195-199.
32. McCann L, Maguire R, Miller M, et al. Patients' perceptions and experiences of using a mobile phone-based advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) to monitor and manage chemotherapy related toxicity. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2009;18:156-164.
33. Berry DL, Blumenstein BA, Halpenny B, et al. Enhancing patientprovider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1029-1035.
34. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16: 606-613.
35. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a selfreport version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999;282:1737-1744.
36. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, et al. Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183:759-769.
37. Donaldson G. Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1303-1313.
38. Fries JF, Witter J, Rose M, et al. Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:153-158.
39. Crane PK, Narasimhalu K, Gibbons LE, et al. Item response theory facilitated cocalibrating cognitive tests and reduced bias in estimated rates of decline. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:1018-1027.
40. Sage JM, Ali A, Farrell J, et al. Moving into the electronic age: validation of rheumatology self-assessment questionnaires on tablet computers [abstract #203]. ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, November 9-14, 2012, Washington, DC. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(suppl 10):2603.
41. Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP, et al. Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10:e215-e222.
42. Cella D, Choi S, Garcia S, et al. Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgment. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:2651-2661.
43. Wagner LI, Spiegel D, Pearman T. Using the science of psychosocial care to implement the new american college of surgeons commission on cancer distress screening standard. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013; 11:214-221.
44. Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1480-1501.
45. Kitahata MM, Rodriguez B, Haubrich R, et al. Cohort profile: the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:948-955.
46. Fredericksen R, Crane PK, Tufano J, et al. Integrating a web-based, patient-administered assessment into primary care for HIV-infected adults. J AIDS HIV Res. 2012;4:47-55.
47. Lawrence ST, Willig JH, Crane HM, et al. Routine, self-administered, touch-screen, computer-based suicidal ideation assessment linked to automated response team notification in an HIV primary care setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:1165-1173.
48. Gutteling JJ, Darlington AS, Janssen HL, et al. Effectiveness of healthrelated quality-of-life measurement in clinical practice: a prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:195-205.
49. Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care. 2007;45:S22-S31.