The future of quality measurement for improvement and accountability

JAMA

Volumn 309, Issue 21, 2013, Pages 2215-2216

  Conway, Patrick H ^a,b   Mostashari, Farzad ^a,c   Clancy, Carolyn ^a,d  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES   (United States)

^c Department of Health and Human Services   (United States)

^d AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 84878556220     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.4929     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Annual Progress Report to Congress: National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care, 2012. http://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/nqs/nqs2012annlrpt.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2013.
2. Cimino JJ. Improving the electronic health record. JAMA. 2013;309(10):991-992.
3. Fleurant M, Kell R, Jenter C, et al. Factors associated with difficult electronic health record implementation in office practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(4):541-544.
4. Kern LM, Malhotra S, Barrón Y, et al. Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(2):77-83.
5. Conway PH, Clancy C. Transformation of health care at the front line. JAMA. 2009;301(7):763-765.