Intrauterine device insertion in the postpartum period: A systematic review

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 4-18

  Sonalkar, Sarita ^a   Kapp, Nathalie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Laboratoire HRA Pharma   (France)

Author keywords

Intrauterine device; Long acting reversible contraception; Postpartum contraception; Postpartum IUD placement

Indexed keywords

LEVONORGESTREL;

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSERTION TIME INTERVAL; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; LEVONORGESTREL RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERAL INFECTION; PUERPERIUM; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TIME; UTERUS BLEEDING; UTERUS PERFORATION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; FEMALE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84921923522     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: 14730782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2014.971454     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kapp N, Curtis K M. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: A systematic review. Contraception 2009; 80: 327-36.
2. Bhutta SZ, Butt IJ, Bano K. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at caesarean section. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011; 21: 527-30.
3. Chen B A, Reeves M F, Hayes J L, et al. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1079-87.
4. Dahlke JD, Terpstra ER, Ramseyer AM, et al. Postpartum insertion of levonorgestrel-intrauterine system at three time periods: A prospective randomized pilot study. Contraception 2011; 84: 244-8.
5. Elsedeek MS. Puerperal and menstrual bleeding patterns with different types of contraceptive device fi tted during elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012; 116: 31-4.
6. Fernandes J, Lippi U. A clinical and ultrasound study on the use of postplacental intrauterine device. Einstein 2004; 2: 110-4.
7. Bryant A G, Kamanga G, Stuart GS, et al. Immediate postpartum versus 6-week postpartum intrauterine device insertion: A feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial. Afr J Reprod Health 2013; 17: 72-9.
8. Thiery M, Van der Pas H, Delbeke L, Van Kets H. Comparative performance of two copper-wired IUDs (ML Cu 250 and T Cu 200): immediate postpartum and interval insertion. Contracept Deliv Syst 1980; 1: 27-35.
9. Mishell DR, Jr., R oy S. Copper intrauterine contraceptive device event rates following insertion 4 to 8 weeks post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 29-35.
10. Thiery M, van Kets H, van der Pas H, et al. The ML Cu250; clinical experience in Belgium and The Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 51-3.
11. Chi I C, Wilkens L, Rogers S. Expulsions in immediate postpartum insertions of Lippes Loop D and Copper T IUDs and their counterpart Delta devices-An epidemiological analysis. Contraception 1985; 32: 119-34.
12. Lara R, Sanchez RA, Aznar R. Aplicació n del dispositivo intrauterino a trav é s de la incisi ó n de la ces á rea. [Application of intrauterine device through the incision of the cesarean section]. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1989; 57: 23-7. [In Spanish].
13. Zhou SW, Chi IC. Immediate postpartum IUD insertions in a Chinese hospital-a two year follow-up. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991; 35: 157-64.
14. Morrison C, Waszak C, Katz K, et al. Clinical outcomes of two early postpartum IUD insertion programs in Africa. Contraception 1996; 53: 17-21.
15. El-Shafei M, Mashali A, Hassan E, et al. Postpartum and postabortion intrauterine device insertion unmet needs of safe reproductive health: Three years experience of a Mansoura University Hospital. J Egypt Soc Obstet Gynecol 2000: 253-62.
16. Letti M ü ller A L, Lopes Ramos JG, Martins-Costa SH, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: A pilot study. Contraception 2005; 72: 192-5.
17. Bonilla Rosales F, Aguilar Zamudio M, Cazares Montero M de L, et al. Factors de expulsi ó n del dispositivo intrauterino TCu380A aplicado en puerperio inmediato y tard í o [Factors for expulsion of intrauterine device TCu380A applied immediately postpartum and after a delayed period. ] Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2005 43: 5-10. [In Spanish].
18. E ro l u K, A kkuzu G, V ural G, et al. C omparison of effi-cacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up. Contraception 2006; 74: 376-81.
19. Lara Ricalde RJ, Menocal Tobias G, Ramos P é r ez C, Vel á squez Ram í rez N. Estudio comparativo al azar entre los dispositivos intrauterinos Multiload Cu375 y TCu 380A, colocados durante el posparto. [Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380A inserted in the postpartum period]. Ginecol Obstet M é x 2006; 75: 306-11. [In Spanish]. Grimes
20. D A, Lopez L M, Schulz K F, et al. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD003036.
21. Harris R P, Helfand M, Woolf S H, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20: 21-35.