Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at caesarean section

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 527-530

  Bhutta, Shereen Zulfiqar ^a   Butt, Iffat Javed ^a   Bano, Khadeja ^a  

^a JINNAH POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL CENTRE   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Interval insertion; Multiload

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ABORTION; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE INFECTION; DEVICE SAFETY; DYSMENORRHEA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; SANITARY PAD; SURGICAL INFECTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; LENGTH OF STAY; PAKISTAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052771050     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. National Institute of Population Studies. Pakistan demographic and health survey; 2006-2007. Islamabad: National Institute of Population Studies; 2008.
2. Bhutta SZ, Korejo R. User's knowledge and perspective on family planning services in Karachi. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
3. Khawaja NP, Tayyeb R, Malik N. Awareness and practices of contraception among Pakistani women attending a tertiary care hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24:564-7.
4. Ding G, Eser E, Cihan UA, Ay S, Pala T, Ergor G, Ozcan C. Fertility preferences, contraceptive behaviors and unmet needs: a gap between urban and suburban parts of a city. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2007; 12:86-94.
5. Sekadde-Kigondu C, Mwathe EG, Ruminjo JK, Nichols D, Katz K, Jessencky K, et al. Acceptability and discontinuation of Depo-Provera, IUCD and combined pill in Kenya. East Afr Med J 1996; 73:786-94.
6. Westhoff C. Contraception at age 35 years and older. Clin Obstet Gynecol.1998; 41:951-7.
7. Puzey M. IUCD insertion at caesarean section--a new look. S Afr Med J 2003; 93:11.
8. Puzey M. Mirena at caesarean section. Eur J contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10:164-7.
9. O'Hanley K, Huber DH. Postpartum IUDs: keys for success. Contraception 1992; 45:351-61
10. Holloway GA, Goldstuck ND, Bowen D. Interval insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device following caesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1989; 29:243-8
11. Xu JX, Connel C, Chi IC. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion-a report on the Chinese experience. Adv Contracept 1992; 8:281-90
12. Letti Müller AL, Lopes Ramos JG, Martins-Costa SH, Palma Dias RS, Valério EG, Hammes LS, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study. Contraception 2005; 72:192-5.
13. Krishnamoorthy U, Zaklama MS, Gurran S. Sterilisation at caesarean section--an audit from a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 23:500-2.
14. Rogayeh N, Rehaney I, Fatemeh RK, Zakaria PM, Fateme BA. Depression and anxiety in sterilised women in Iran. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007; 33:287.
15. Curtis KM, Mohlajee AP, Peterson HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systemic review. Contraception 2006; 73:205-10.
16. Toma A, Jamieson MA. Revisiting the intrauterine contraceptive device in adolescents. J Paediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2006; 19:291-6.
17. Plante LA. Public health implications of cesarean on demand. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006; 61:807-15.
18. Aelvoet W, Windey F, Molenbergs G, Verstaelen H, Van Reempts P, Foifart JM. Screening for inter-hospital differences in cesarean section rates in low-risk deliveries using administrative data. An initiative to improve the quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res 2008 Jan 4; 8:3.
19. Rosenfeld JA, Zahorik PM, Saint W, Murphy G. Women's satisfaction with birth control. J Fam Pract 1993; 36:169-73.
20. Townsend S. Postpartum options: matching the method to individual needs. Network 1990; 11:12-5.