Effect of imaging powder and CAD/CAM stone types on the marginal gap of zirconia crowns

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 146, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 111-120

  Alghazzawi, Tariq F ^a,b   Al Samadani, Khalid H ^b   Lemons, Jack ^c   Liu, Perng Ru ^d   Essig, Milton E ^d   Bartolucci, Alfred A ^c   Janowski, Gregg M ^a  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^b TAIBAH UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Imaging powder; Impression; Marginal fit; Scanner; Zirconia

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POWDER; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; HUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; POWDER; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH CROWN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PARTICLE SIZE; POWDERS; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84921911862     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2014.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(6):447-454
2. Saltzberg DS, Ceravolo FJ, Holstein F, Groom G, Gottsegen R. Scanning electron microscope study of the junction between restorations and gingival cavosurface margins. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36(5):517-522
3. Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil. 1986;13(5):423-432
4. Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116(6): 579-584
5. Romero GG, Engelmeier R, Powers JM, Canterbury AA. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(6):602-607
6. Lobbezoo F, Brouwers JE, Cune MS, Naeije M. Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(2): 152-159
7. Fernández M, Delgado L, Molmeneu M, García D, Rodríguez D. Analysis of the misfit of dental implant-supported prostheses made with three manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(2):116-123
8. Aktas G, Özcan N, Aydin D, Şahin E, Akça K. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(5):367-372
9. Santos M, Bacchi A, Sobrinho L, Consani R. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27(1):26-32
10. Kahramanoʇlu E, Yasemin Kulak-Özkan Y. The effect of different restorative and abutment materials on marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit cantilever implant-supported fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2013;22(8):608-617
11. Lin K, Wadhwani C, Sharma A, Finzen F. A radiograph positioning technique to evaluate prosthetic misfit and bone loss around implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(2):163-165
12. Hamza T, Ezzat H, El-Hossary M, Katamish H, Shokry TE, Rosenstiel SF. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(2):83-87
13. Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Yates DM, Izutani N, Enkling N, Blatz MB. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing titanium and zirconium dioxide bars. Dent Mater. 2013;29(9):945-953
14. Asavapanumas C, Leevailoj C. The influence of finish line curvature on the marginal gap width of ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(4): 226-233
15. Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014;42(2):199-209
16. Silva J, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of fourunit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Invest. 2014;18(2):515-523
17. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Invest. 2013; 17(7):1759-1764
18. Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent. 2010;35(3): 324-329
19. Cook KT, Fasbinder DJ. Accuracy of CAD/CAM crown fit with infrared and LED cameras. Int J Comput Dent. 2012;15(4):315-326
20. Mormann WH. International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 1991
21. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(3):319-325
22. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(4):283-291
23. Alghazzawi TF, Liu PR, Essig ME. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21(3):167-172.