Web-mediated knowledge synthesis for educators

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 388-396

  Deschryver, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Adult; College university students; Depth of (higher level, literal level, etc.); Information and communication technologies; Information literacy; Informational text; Instructional strategies; Instructional technology; Learning strategies; Metacognition; Metacognitive strategies; New literacies; teaching strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921890142     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jaal.373     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. DeSchryver, M., (2015). Higher-Order Thinking in an Online World: Toward a Theory of Web-Mediated Knowledge Synthesis. Teachers College Record, 117 (3).
2. DeSchryver, M., (2012). Toward a theory of web-mediated knowledge synthesis: How advanced learners used the web to construct knowledge about climate change behavior. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses. (3548603).
3. Bloom, Benjamin, S., &, David R., Krathwohl,. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans.
4. Chase, Z., &, Laufenberg, D., (2011). Embracing the squishiness of digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54 (7), 535-537.
5. Coiro, J., Zawilinski, L., &, Kennedy, C., (2011, April). Using cognitive labs to refine item design for assessments of online reading comprehension in open authentic Internet environments. Poster presented in Leu, D. (Chair), Developing and evaluating three formats for assessing online reading comprehension. Structured poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
6. Cope, B., &, Kalantzis, M., (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164-195.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1997). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
8. Digital literacy and citizenship classroom curriculum. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/educators/curriculum
9. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., &, Pearson, P.D., (1991). Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
10. Duke, N. K., &, Pearson, D., (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In, A. E. Farstrup, &, S. J. Samuels, (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11. Harris, J., (2006). Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts. Logan: Utah State University Press.
12. Henry, L. A., (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 59, 614-627.
13. Kiewra, K., (1989). A review of note-taking. The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Reivew, 1 (2), 147-172.
14. Kintsch, W., (1998). Comprehension. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kress, G., (2000). Design and Transformation: New Theories of Meaning. In, B. Cope, and, M. Kalantzis, (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 155-156). London, England: Routledge.
16. Lessig, L., (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.
17. Leu, D. J., McVerry, J. G., O'Byrne, W. I., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett-Cacopardo, H., &, Forzani, E., (2011). The new literacies of online reading comprehension: Expanding the literacy and learning curriculum. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55, 5-14.
18. Lu, J., &, Deng, L., (2012). Reading actively online: An exploratory investigation of online annotation tools for learning inquiry. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39 (3).
19. McEneaney, J. E., (2011). Web 3.0, litbots, and TPWSGWTAU. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54 (5), 376-378.
20. Mishra, P., &, Koehler, M. J., (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054.
21. Spiro, R. J., &, Jehng, J. C., (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In, D. Nix, &, R. J. Spiro, (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Explorations in high technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Spiro, R. J., (2006). The "New Gutenberg Revolution": Radical new learning, thinking, teaching, and training with technology...bringing the future near. Educational Technology, 46 (6), 3-5.
23. Sternberg, R. J., (1988). The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
24. Taxonomy of Internet reading comprehension skills and strategies. Retrieved from University of Connecticut New Literacies Web site: http://www.newliteracies.uconn.edu/iesproject/documents/TICA-Taxonomy-of-Skills.pdf
25. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Future-of-the-Internet-IV.aspx
26. http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1595442
27. http://www.ted.com/conversations/16906/what-do-you-think-is-the-futur.html
28. http://www.knowledgeworks.org/sites/default/files/A-Glimpse-into-the-Future-of-Learning-Infographic-0.pdf
29. https://www.diigo.com/education