Networks in Archaeology: Phenomena, Abstraction, Representation

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-32

  Collar, Anna ^a   Coward, Fiona ^b   Brughmans, Tom ^c   Mills, Barbara J ^d  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Archaeology; Network science; Relational archaeology; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921845246     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-014-9235-6     Document Type: Article

References (166)

1. Albert, R., & Barabási, A. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(January), 47–97.
2. Anthonisse, J. M. (1971). The rush in a graph. Amsterdam: Mathematische Centrum.
3. Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
4. Borck, L., Mills, B. J., Peeples, M. A., & Clark, J. J. (2015). Are social networks survival networks? An example from the Late Prehispanic U.S. Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory,22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9236-5.
5. Borgatti, B., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Los Angeles: Sage.
6. Brandes, U., Robins, G., McCranie, A., & Wasserman, S. (2013). What is network science? Network Science, 1(01), 1–15. doi:10.1017/nws.2013.2.
7. Brughmans, T. (2013). Networks of networks: a citation network analysis of the adoption, use and adaptation of formal network techniques in archaeology. Literary and Linguistic Computing, The Journal of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 28(4), 538–562.
8. Brughmans, T. (2014). The roots and shoots of archaeological network analysis: a citation analysis and review of the archaeological use of formal network methods. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 18–41.
9. Brughmans, T., Collar, A., & Coward, F. (2015). Introduction: challenging network perspectives on the past. In T. Brughmans, A. Collar, & F. Coward (Eds.), The connected past: challenges to network studies of the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Brughmans, T., Keay, S., & Earl, G. P. (2015). Understanding inter-settlement visibility in Iron Age and Roman Southern Spain with exponential random graph models for visibility networks. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9231-x.
11. Crabtree, S. (2015). Inferring ancestral Pueblo social networks from simulation in the Central Mesa Verde. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9233-8.
12. Fenn, J., & Raskino, M. (2008). Mastering the hype cycle. How to choose the right innovation at the right time. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
13. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.
14. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. I. Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
15. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.
16. Gjesfjeld, E. (2015). Network Analysis of archaeological data from Hunter-Gatherers: methodological problems and potential solutions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9232-9.
17. Golitko, M., & Feinman, G. M. (2015). Procurement and distribution of Pre-Hispanic Mesoamerican Obsidian 900 BC–AD 1520: a social network analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9211-1.
18. Graham, S., & Weingart, S. (2015). The Equifinality of archaeological networks: an agent-based exploratory lab approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9230-y.
19. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
20. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
21. Hess, M. (2004). “Spatial” relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 165–186.
22. Hodder, I. (2011). Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 17(1), 154–177.
23. Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
24. Isaksen, L. (2013). “O what a tangled web we weave”—Towards a practice that does not deceive. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 43–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Knappett, C. (2011). An archaeology of interaction: Network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Knappett, C. (Ed.). (2013). Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Knappett, C. (2015). Networks in archaeology: between scientific method and humanistic metaphor. In T. Brughmans, A. Collar, & F. Coward (Eds.), The connected past: Challenges to network studies of the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (in press)
28. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Lorrain, F., & White, H. C. (1971). Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 49–80.
30. Mills, B. J., Borck, L., Clark, J. J., Haas, Jr., W. R., Peeples, M. A., & Roberts, Jr. J. M. (2014). Multiscalar perspectives on Southwest social networks, A.D. 1200–1450. American Antiquity.
31. Mills, B. J., Clark, J. J., Peeples, M. A., Haas, W. R., Roberts, J. M., Hill, J. B., Shackley, M. S. (2013). Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219966110
32. Mol, A. A. A., Hoogland, M., & Hofman, C. L. (2015). Remotely local: ego-networks of late pre-colonial (AD 1000–1450) Saba, Northeastern Caribbean. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9234-7.
33. Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Östborn, P., & Gerding, H. (2015). The diffusion of fired bricks in Hellenistic Europe: a similarity network analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1). doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9229-4.
35. Peeples, M. A., Mills, B. J., Roberts, J. M., Jr., Clark, J. J., & Haas, W. R., Jr. (2014). Analytical issues in the application of network analyses to archaeology. In T. Brughmans, A. Collar, & F. Coward (Eds.), The connected past: Challenges to network studies of the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Peeples, M. A., & Roberts, J. M., Jr. (2013). To binarize or not to binarize: relational data and the construction of archaeological networks. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(7), 3001–3010.
37. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon.
38. Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. London: Sage.
39. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. doi:10.1038/30918.
41. White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–779.
42. Alexander, C. (2008). The Bedolina map: an exploratory network analysis. In A. Posluschny, K. Lambers, & I. Herzog (Eds.), Layers of perception: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. (Kolloquien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Vol. 10) (pp. 366–371). Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH.
43. Allen, K. M. S. (1990). Modelling early historic trade in the eastern Great Lakes using geographic information systems. In K. M. S. Allen, S. W. Green, & E. B. W. Zubrow (Eds.), Interpreting space: GIS and archaeology (pp. 319–329). London - New York - Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
44. Barthélemy, M. (2014). Discussion: social and spatial networks. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 51–61.
45. Bentley, R. A., & Maschner, H. D. G. (2003). Complex systems and archaeology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
46. Bentley, R. A., & Maschner, H. D. G. (2007). Complexity theory. In R. A. Bentley, H. D. G. Maschner, & C. Chippendale (Eds.), Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 245–270). AltaMira Press. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.012.
47. Bentley, R. A., & Shennan, S. J. (2003). Cultural transmission and stochastic network growth. American Antiquity, 68(3), 459–485.
48. Bentley, R. A., & Shennan, S. J. (2005). Random copying and cultural evolution. Science, 309, 877–878. doi:10.1126/science.309.5736.874b.
49. Bentley, R., Lake, M., & Shennan, S. (2005). Specialization and wealth inequality in a model of a clustered economic network. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32(9), 1346–1356. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.03.008.
50. Bernardini, W. (2007). Jeddito Yellow Ware and Hopi social networks. Kiva, 72(3), 295–328.
51. Bevan, A., & Crema, E. R. (2014). Une modélisation géographiquement explicite d’interaction culturelle. Dialectes crétois modernes, archéologie de l'âge du Bronze. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 45–50.
52. Bevan, A., & Wilson, A. (2013). Models of settlement hierarchy based on partial evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(5), 2415–2427. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.025.
53. Bintliff, J. (2004). Time, structure, and agency: the Annales, emergent complexity, and archaeology. In J. Bintliff (Ed.), A companion to archaeology (pp. 174–194). Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Blake, E. (2013). Social networks, path dependence, and the rise of ethnic groups in pre-Roman Italy. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: new approaches to regional interaction (pp. 203–222). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Blake, E. (2014). Dyads and triads in community detection: a view from the Italian Bronze Age. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 28–31.
56. Branting, S. (2007). Using an urban street network and a PGIS-T approach to analyze ancient movement. In E. M. Clark, J. T. Hagenmeister (Ed.), Digital discovery: Exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006 (p. 87–96). Budapest.
57. Broodbank, C. (2000). An island archaeology of the early Cyclades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Brughmans, T. (2010). Connecting the dots: towards archaeological network analysis. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 29(3), 277–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2010.00349.x.
59. Brughmans, T. (2012). Facebooking the past: A critical social network analysis approach for archaeology. In A. Chrysanthi, M. P. Flores, & C. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Thinking beyond the tool: Archaeological computing and the interpretative process. British Archaeological Reports International Series (pp. 191–203). Oxford: Archaeo press.
60. Brughmans, T. (2013a). Thinking through networks: a review of formal network methods in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20, 623–662. doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8.
61. Brughmans, T. (2013b). Networks of networks: a citation network analysis of the adoption, use and adaptation of formal network techniques in archaeology. Literary and Linguistic Computing, The Journal of Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 28(4), 538–562. doi:10.1093/llc/fqt048.
62. Brughmans, T. (2014). The roots and shoots of archaeological network analysis: a citation analysis and review of the archaeological use of formal network methods. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 18–41.
63. Brughmans, T., Isaksen, L., & Earl, G. (2012). Connecting the dots: an introduction to critical approaches in archaeological network analysis. In M. Zhou, I. Romanowska, Z. Wu, P. Xu, & P. Verhagen (Eds.), Proceedings of computer applications and quantitative techniques in archaeology conference 2011, Beijing (pp. 359–369). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
64. Brughmans, T., Keay, S., & Earl, G. (2012). Complex networks in archaeology: urban connectivity in Iron Age and Roman Southern Spain. Leonardo, 45(3), 280.
65. Clarke, D. L. (1968). Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.
66. Classen, E. (2004). Verfahren der “Sozialen Netzwerkanalyse” und ihre Anwendung in der Archäologie. Archäologische Informationen, 27, 219–226.
67. Classen, E. (2008). Early Neolithic social networks in Western Germany. In A. Posluschny, K. Lambers, & I. Herzog (Eds.), Layers of perception. Proceedings of the 35th international conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (CAA), Berlin April 2-6 2007. Kolloquien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Vol. 10. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH. 372+CD-ROM.
68. Classen, E., & Zimmerman, A. (2004). Tessellation and triangulations: Understanding Early Neolithic social networks. In K. F. Ausserer (Ed.), Enter the past: proceedings of the 30th CAA conference held in Vienna, Austria, April 2003. Oxford, 467–471.
69. Cochrane, E. E., & Lipo, C. (2010). Phylogenetic analyses of Lapita decoration do not support branching evolution or regional population structure during colonization of Remote Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 365, 3889–3902.
70. Collar, A. C. F. (2007). Network theory and religious innovation. Mediterranean Historical Review, 22(1), 149–162. doi:10.1080/09518960701539372.
71. Collar, A. C. F. (2008). Networks and religious innovation in the Roman Empire. PhD thesis, University of Exeter.
72. Collar, A. C. F. (2013a). Religious networks in the Roman Empire: The spread of new ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Collar, A. C. F. (2013b). Re-thinking Jewish ethnicity through social network analysis. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 223–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Collar, A. C. F., Brughmans, T., Coward, F., & Lemercier, C. (2014). Analyser les réseaux du passé en archéologie et en histoire. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 9–13.
75. Coward, F. (2010). Small worlds, material culture and ancient Near Eastern social networks. Proceedings of the British Academy, 158, 449–479.
76. Coward, F. (2013). Grounding the net: social networks, material culture and geography in the Epipalaeolithic and early Neolithic of the Near East (~21–6,000 cal BCE). In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 247–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Coward, F., & Gamble, C. (2008). Big brains, small worlds: material culture and the evolution of the mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 1969–1979. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0004.
78. Doran, J. E., & Hodson, F. R. (1975). Mathematics and computers in archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
79. Dunn, H. (2014). Population genetics and the investigation of past human interactions. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 42–66.
80. Earl, G., & Keay, S. (2007). Urban connectivity of Iberian and Roman Towns in Southern Spain: a network analysis approach. In J. T. Clark, & E. M. Hagenmeister (Eds.) Digital discovery: Exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006 (pp. 77–86).
81. Evans, S., & Felder, K. (2014). Making the connection: changing perspectives on social networks. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 9–17.
82. Evans, T., Knappett, C., & Rivers, R. (2009). Using statistical physics to understand relational space: a case study from Mediterranean prehistory. In D. Lane, D. Pumain, S. Van Der Leeuw, & G. West (Eds.), Complexity perspectives in innovation (pp. 451–479). Dordrecht: Springer.
83. Fulminante, F. (2012). Social network analysis and the emergence of central places: a case study from Central Italy (Latium Vetus). BABesch, 87, 27–53.
84. Fulminante, F. (2014). The network approach: tool or paradigm? Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 167–178.
85. Gamble, C. (1999). The Palaeolithic societies of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Gjesfjeld, E., & Phillips, S. C. (2013). Evaluating adaptive network strategies with geochemical sourcing data: a case study from the Kuril Islands. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 281–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Golitko, M., Meierhoff, J., Feinman, G. M., & Williams, P. R. (2012). Complexities of collapse: the evidence of Maya obsidian as revealed by social network graphical analysis. Antiquity, 86, 507–523.
88. Graham, S. (2005). Agent-based modelling, archaeology and social organisation: the robustness of Rome. The Archaeological Computing Newsletter, 63, 1–6.
89. Graham, S. (2006a). EX FIGLINIS, the network dynamics of the Tiber valley brick industry in the hinterland of Rome, BAR international series 1486. Oxford: Archaeopress.
90. Graham, S. (2006b). Networks, agent-based models and the Antonine Itineraries: implications for Roman archaeology. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 19(1), 45–64.
91. Graham, S. (2006). Who’s in charge? Studying social networks in the Roman brick industry in Central Italy. In C. Mattusch & A. Donohue (Eds.), Common ground: Archaeology, art, science, and humanities—Proceedings of the XVI International Congress of Classical Archaeology, Oxford (pp. 359–362).
92. Graham, S. (2009). The space between: the geography of social networks in the Tiber valley. In F. Coarelli & H. Patterson (Eds.), Mercator Placidissimus: the Tiber Valley in Antiquity, new research in the upper and middle river valley. Edizioni Quasar: Rome.
93. Graham, S. (2014). On connecting stamps—network analysis and epigraphy. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 39–44.
94. Graham, S., & Steiner, J. (2007). TravellerSim: growing settlement structures and territories with agent-based modeling. In J. T. Clark & E. M. Hagenmeister (Eds.), Digital discovery: exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006 (pp. 57–67). Budapest: Archaeolingua.
95. Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1983). Structural models in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1991). Exchange in Oceania: A graph theoretic analysis. Oxford: Clarendon.
97. Hage, P., & Harary, F. (1996). Island networks: communication, kinship and classification structures in Oceania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. Hiorns, R. W. (1971). Statistical studies in migration. In F. R. Hodson, D. G. Kendall, & P. Tăutu (Eds.), Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences, Proceedings of the Anglo-Romanian conference, Mamaia 1970 (pp. 291–302). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
99. Hunt, T. L. (1988). Graph theoretic network models for Lapita exchange: a trial application. In P. V. Kirch & T. L. Hunt (Eds.), Archaeology of the Lapita cultural complex: A critical review (pp. 135–155). Seattle: Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum Research Reports no. 5.
100. Hutchinson, P. (1972). Networks and roman roads: a further Roman network. Area, 4(4), 279–280.
101. Irwin, G. (1978). Pots and entrepôts: a study of settlement, trade and the development of economic specialization in Papuan prehistory. World Archaeology, 9(3), 299–319.
102. Isaksen, L. (2007). Network analysis of transport vectors in Roman Baetica. In J. T. Clark & E. M. Hagenmeister (Eds.), Digital discovery: Exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006 (pp. 76–87). Budapest: Archaeolingua.
103. Isaksen, L. (2008). The application of network analysis to ancient transport geography: a case study of Roman Baetica. Digital Medievalist, 4, http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/4/isakse.
104. Isaksen, L. (2013). “O what a tangled web we weave”—Towards a practice that does not deceive. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 43–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Jenkins, D. (2001). A network analysis of Inka roads, administrative centers, and storage facilities. Ethnohistory, 48(4), 655–687.
106. Jiménez, D., & Chapman, D. (2002). An application of proximity graphs in archaeological spatial analysis. In D. Wheatley, G. Earl, & S. Poppy (Eds.), Contemporary themes in archaeological computing (pp. 90–99). Oxford: Oxbow Books.
107. Kendall, D. (1969). Incidence matrices, interval graphs and seriation in archeology. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 28(3), 565–570.
108. Kendall, D. G. (1971a). Seriation from abundance matrices. In F. R. Hodson, D. G. Kendall, & P. Tăutu (Eds.), Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences, Proceedings of the Anglo-Romanian conference, Mamaia 1970 (pp. 215–252). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
109. Kendall, D. G. (1971b). Maps from marriages: an application of non-metric multi-dimensional scaling to parish register data. In F. R. Hodson, D. G. Kendall, & P. Tăutu (Eds.), Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences, Proceedings of the Anglo-Romanian conference, Mamaia 1970 (pp. 303–318). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
110. Knappett, C. (2011). An archaeology of interaction: Network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111. Knappett, C. (2013a). Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
112. Knappett, C. (2013b). Introduction: why networks? In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
113. Knappett, C. (2014). Avant-propos. Dossier: Analyse des réseaux sociaux en archéologie. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 5–8.
114. Knappett, C., Evans, T., & Rivers, R. (2008). Modelling maritime interaction in the Aegean Bronze Age. Antiquity, 82(318), 1009–1024.
115. Knappett, C., Evans, T., & Rivers, R. (2011). The Theran eruption and Minoan palatial collapse: new interpretations gained from modelling the maritime network. Antiquity, 85(329), 1008–1023.
116. Kohler, T. A. (2012). Complex systems and archaeology. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Archaeological theory today II (pp. 93–123). Cambridge: Polity Press.
117. Leidwanger, J. (2014). Maritime networks and economic regionalism in the Roman Eastern Mediterranean. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 32–38.
118. Lock, G., & Pouncett, J. (2007). Network analysis in archaeology session introduction: an introduction to network analysis. In J. T. Clark & E. M. Hagenmeister (Eds.), Digital discovery: exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006 (pp. 71–73). Budapest: Archaeolingua.
119. Mackie, Q. (2001). Settlement archaeology in a Fjordland archipelago: Network analysis, social practice and the built environment of Western Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada since 2,000 BP. BAR international series 926. Oxford: Archaeopress.
120. Menze, B. H., & Ur, J. A. (2012). Mapping patterns of long-term settlement in Northern Mesopotamia at a large scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(14), E778–E787. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115472109.
121. Mills, B. J., Clark, J. J., Peeples, M. A., Haas, W. R., Roberts, J. M., Hill, J. B., Shackley, M. S. (2013). Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1219966110
122. Mills, B. J., Roberts, J. M., Clark, J. J., Jr., Haas, W. R., Huntley, D., Peeples, M. A., & Breiger, R. L. (2013b). In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 181–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
123. Mizoguchi, K. (2009). Nodes and edges: a network approach to hierarchisation and state formation in Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28(1), 14–26. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2008.12.001.
124. Mizoguchi, K. (2014). Evolution of prestige good systems: An application of network analysis to the transformation of communication systems and their media. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 151–179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
125. Mol, A. A. A. (2014). Play-things and the origins of online networks: virtual material culture in multiplayer games. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 144–166.
126. Mol, A. A. A., & Mans, J. (2013). Old boy networks in the indigenous Caribbean. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 307–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
127. Müller, U. (2010). Zentrale Orte und Netzwerk Zwei Konzepte zur Beschreibung von Zentralität. In C. Dobiat, P. Ettel, & F. Fless (Eds.), Zwischen Fjorden und Steppe. Festschrift fur Johan Callmer zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 57–67). Rahden: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH.
128. Müller, U. (2012). Networks of towns—networks of periphery? Some relations between the North European Medieval town and its hinterland. In S. Brather, U. Müller, & H. Steuer (Eds.), Raumbildung durch Netzwerke? Der Ostseeraum zwischen Wikingerzeit un Spaetmittelalter aus archaeologischer und geschichtswissenschaftlicher Perspektive (pp. 55–78). Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH.
129. Munson, J. (2013). From metaphors to practice: operationalizing network concepts for archaeological stratigraphy. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. doi:10.1007/s10816-013-9181-8.
130. Munson, J. L., & Macri, M. J. (2009). Sociopolitical network interactions: a case study of the Classic Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28(4), 424–438. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2009.08.002.
131. Nelson, E. S., & Kassabaum, M. C. (2014). Expanding social networks through ritual deposition: a case study from the Lower Mississippi Valley. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 103–128.
132. Orser, C, Jr. (2005). Network theory and the archaeology of modern history. In P. Funari, A. Zarankin, & E. Stovel (Eds.) Global archaeological theory SE - 7 (pp. 77–95). Springer US. doi:10.1007/0-306-48652-0_7.
133. Orton, C. (1980). Mathematics in archaeology. London: Collins.
134. Östborn, P., & Gerding, H. (2014). Network analysis of archaeological data: a Systematic Approach. Journal of Archaeological Science.
135. Peeples, M. A. (2011). Identity and social transformation in the prehispanic Cibola world: A.D. 1150-1325. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University.
136. Peeples, M. A., & Roberts, J. M. (2013). To binarize or not to binarize: relational data and the construction of archaeological networks. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(7), 3001–3010. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.014.
137. Peregrine, P. (1991). A graph-theoretic approach to the evolution of Cahokia. American Antiquity, 56(1), 66–75.
138. Phillips, S. C. (2011). Networked glass: Lithic raw material consumption and social networks in the Kuril islands. University of Washington, Seattle: Far Eastern Russia. Unpublished PhD dissertation.
139. Pouncett, J., & Lock, G. (2007). A vector-based approach to the integration of geophysical and test-pitting data: Phasing the South Cadbury Environs Project. In E. M. Clark & J. T. Hagenmeister (Eds.), Digital discovery: Exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006 (p. 97–106). Budapest.
140. Riede, F. (2014). Eruptions and ruptures—a social network perspective on vulnerability and impact of the Laacher See eruption (c. 13,000 BP) on Late Glacial hunter-gatherers in northern Europe. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 67–102.
141. Rivers, R., & Evans, T. S. (2013). What makes a site important? Centrality, gateways and gravity. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 125–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
142. Rivers, R., & Evans, T. S. (2014). New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure. Nouvelles de l’archéologie, 135, 21–28.
143. Rothman, M. (1987). Graph theory and the interpretation of regional survey data. Paléorient, 13(2), 73–91. doi:10.3406/paleo.1987.4430.
144. Santley, R. S. (1991). The structure of the Aztec transport network. In C. D. Trombold (Ed.), Ancient road networks and settlement hierarchies in the New World (pp. 198–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
145. Schich, M., & Coscia, M. (2011). Exploring co-occurrence on a meso and global level using network analysis and rule mining. In Proceedings of the ninth workshop on mining and Learning with Graphs (MLG ’11). San Diego: ACM.
146. Schich, M., Hidalgo, C. A., Lehmann, S. J., & Park, J. (2009). The network of subject co-popularity in Classical Archaeology. Bollettino di Archeologia Online, 49–57.
147. Scholnick, J. B., Munson, J. L., & Macri, M. J. (2013). Positioning power in a multi-relational framework: A social network analysis of Classic Maya political rhetoric. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 95–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
148. Schweizer, T., Hage, P., Harary, F., Houseman, M., Kent, S., & Wolfe, A. W. (1997). Embeddedness of ethnographic cases: a social networks perspective. Current Anthropology, 38(5), 739–760.
149. Shuchat, A. (1984). Matrix and network models in archaeology. Mathematics Magazine, 57(1), 3–14.
150. Sindbæk, S. M. (2007a). Networks and nodal points: the emergence of towns in Early Viking Age Scandinavia. Antiquity, 81(311), 119–132.
151. Sindbæk, S. M. (2007b). The small world of the Vikings: Networks in Early Medieval communication and exchange. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 40, 59–74.
152. Sindbæk, S. M. (2009). Open access, nodal points, and central places: maritime communication and locational principles for coastal sites in south Scandinavia, c. AD 400–1200. Estonian Journal of Archaeology, 13(2), 96. doi:10.3176/arch.2009.2.02.
153. Sindbæk, S. M. (2013). Broken links and black boxes: Material affiliations and contextual network synthesis in the Viking world. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 71–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
154. Stoner, J. (2014). “Extending the self” through material culture: private letters and personal relationships in second-century AD Egypt. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 29(1), 129–143.
155. Swanson, S. (2003). Documenting prehistoric communication networks: a case study in the Paquimé polity. American Antiquity, 68(4), 753–767.
156. Terrell, J. E. (1976). Island biogeography and man in Melanesia. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania, 11(1), 1–17.
157. Terrell, J. E. (1977a). Geographic systems and human diversity in the North Solomons. World Archaeology, 9(1), 62–81.
158. Terrell, J. E. (1977b). Human biogeography in the Solomon Islands. Fieldiana Anthropology, 68(1), 1–47.
159. Terrell, J. E. (2010a). Language and material culture on the Sepik Coast of Papua New Guinea: using social network analysis to simulate, graph, identify, and analyze social and cultural boundaries between communities. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 5(1), 3–32.
160. Terrell, J. E. (2010b). Social network analysis of the genetic structure of Pacific islanders. Annals of Human Genetics, 74(3), 211–232. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00575.x.
161. Terrell, J. E. (2013). Social network analysis and the practice of history. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 17–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
162. Van der Leeuw, S. E. (2013). Archaeology, networks, information processing, and beyond. In C. Knappett (Ed.), Network analysis in archaeology: New approaches to regional interaction (pp. 335–348). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
163. Van Oyen, A. (2014). Les acteurs-réseaux en archéologie: État de la question et perspectives futures. Nouvelles de l’Archéologie, 135, 14–20.
164. Verhagen, P., Brughmans, T., Nuninger, L., & Bertoncello, F. (2013). The long and winding road: Combining least cost paths and network analysis techniques for settlement location analysis and predictive modelling. In Proceedings of computer applications and quantitative techniques in archaeology conference 2012, Southampton (pp. 357–366). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
165. Wernke, S. A. (2012). Spatial network analysis of a terminal prehispanic and early colonial settlement in highland Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(4), 1111–1122. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.12.014.
166. Zubrow, E. B. W. (1990). Modelling and prediction with geographic information systems: a demographic example from prehistoric and historic New York. In K. M. S. Allen, S. W. Green, & E. B. W. Zubrow (Eds.), Interpreting space: GIS and archaeology (pp. 307–318). New York: Taylor & Francis.