To binarize or not to binarize: Relational data and the construction of archaeological networks

Journal of Archaeological Science

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 3001-3010

  Peeples, Matthew A ^a   Roberts, John M ^b  

^a Archaeology Southwest   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Network centrality; Sensitivity analysis; Social network analysis; U.S. Southwest

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; ARCHAEOLOGY; ARTIFACT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORK; VISUALIZATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84876466032     PISSN: 03054403     EISSN: 10959238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Barnes J.A. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations 1954, 7:39-58.
2. Barrat A., Barthélemy M., Pastor-Satorras R., Vespignani A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101:3747-3752.
3. Bernardini W. Jeddito Yellow Ware and Hopi Social Networks. Kiva 2007, 72:295-328.
4. Bonacich P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1972, 2:113-120.
5. Bonacich P. Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Social Networks 1991, 13:155-168.
6. Bonacich P., Lloyd P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Social Networks 2001, 23:191-201.
7. Borgatti S.P. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 2005, 27:55-71.
8. Bott E. Urban families: conjugal roles and social networks. Human Relations 1955, 8:345-384.
9. Brainerd G.W. The place of chronological ordering in archaeological analysis. American Antiquity 1951, 16:301-313.
10. Brandes U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2001, 25:163-177.
11. Brughmans T. Connecting the dots: towards archaeological network analysis. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2010, 29:277-303.
12. Brughmans, T. Thinking through networks: a review of formal network methods in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8.
13. Burt R.S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure or Competition 1992, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Burt R.S. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Butts C.T. Social network analysis with sna. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 24.
16. Butts C.T. Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 2009, 325:414-416.
17. Cochrane E.E., Lipo C.P. Phylogenetic analyses of Lapita decoration do not support branching evolution or regional population structure during colonization of Remote Oceania. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2010, 365:3889-3902.
18. Coleman J.S. Social capital in the creation of Human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 1988, 94:S95-S120.
19. Coleman J.S. Foundations of Social Theory 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Coward F. Small worlds, material culture and ancient near eastern social networks. Proceedings of the British Academy 2010, 158:453-484.
21. Cowgill G. Why Pearson's r is not a good similarity coefficient for comparing collections. American Antiquity 1990, 55:512-521.
22. Csardi G., Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems 2006, http://igraph.sf.net.
23. Dijkstra E.W. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerihe Mathematik 1959, 1:269-271.
24. Doran J.E., Hodson F.R. Mathematics and Computers in Archaeology 1975, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
25. Duff A.I. Scale, interaction, and regional analysis in late Pueblo prehistory. The Archaeology of Regional Interaction: Religion, Warfare, and Exchange Across the American Southwest 2000, 51-71. University of Colorado Press, Boulder. M. Hegmon (Ed.).
26. Foti N.J., Hughes J.M., Rockmore D.N. Nonparametric sparsification of complex multiscale networks. PLoS One 2011, 6:e16431.
27. Freeman L.C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 1977, 40:35-41.
28. Freeman L.C. Centrality in networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1979, 1:215-239.
29. Freeman L.C., Borgatti S.P., White D.R. Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks 1991, 13:141-154.
30. Freeman L.C. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science 2004, Empirical Press, Vancouver.
31. Freeman L.C. Graphic techniques for exploring social network data. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis 2005, 248-269. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P.J. Carrington, J. Scott, S. Wasserman (Eds.).
32. Ceramic Production and Circulation in the Greater Southwest: Source Determination by INAA and Complementary Mineralogical Investigations 2002, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, Los Angeles. D.M. Glowacki, H. Neff (Eds.).
33. Golitko M., Meierhoff J., Feinman G.M., Williams P.R. Complexities of collapse: the evidence of Maya obsidian as revealed by social network graphical analysis. Antiquity 2012, 86:507-523.
34. Grady D., Thiemann C., Brockmann D. Robust classification of salient links in complex networks. Nature Communications 2012, 3.
35. Graham S. Networks, agent-based models and the Antonine Itineraries: implications for Roman archaeology. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 2006, 19:45-64.
36. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 1973, 78:1360-1380.
37. Hage P., Harary F. Structural Models in Anthropology 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Handcock M.S., Hunter D.R., Butts C.T., Goodreau S.M., Morris M. Statnet: Software Tools for the Statistical Modeling of Network Data 2003, URL:. http://statnetproject.org.
39. Hart J.P., Engelbrecht W. Northern Iroquoian ethnic evolution: a social network analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2012, 19:322-349.
40. Hill J.B., Clark J.J., Doelle W.H., Lyons P.D. Prehistoric demography in the Southwest: migration, coalescence, and Hohokam population decline. American Antiquity 2004, 69:689-716.
41. Hill J.B., Wilcox D.R., Doelle W.H., Robinson W.J. Coalescent Communities GIS Database Version 2.0: Archaeology Southwest and Museum of Northern Arizona 2012, Archaeology Southwest, Tucson.
42. Irwin-Williams C. A network model for the analysis of prehistoric trade. Exchange Systems in Prehistory 1977, 141-151. Academic, New York. T.K. Earle, J. Ericson (Eds.).
43. Isaksen L. Network analysis of transport vectors in Roman Baetica. Digital Discovery: Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA Conference, Fargo, 2006 2007, 76-87. Archaeolingua, Budapest. J.T. Clark, E.M. Hagenmeister (Eds.).
44. Isaksen L. The application of network analysis to ancient transport geography: a case study of Roman Baetica. Digital Medievalist 2008, 5. Retrieved 2 February 2013. http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/4/isaksen/.
45. Jenkins D. A network analysis of Inka roads, administrative centers, and storage facilities. Ethnohistory 2001, 48:655-687.
46. Kendall D.G. Incidence matrices, interval graphs and seriation in archaeology. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 1969, 28:565-570.
47. Knappett C., Evans T., Rivers R. Modeling maritime interaction in the Aegean Bronze Age. Antiquity 2008, 82:1009-1024.
48. Knappett C. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Knappett C., Evans T., Rivers R. The Theran eruption and Minoan palatial collapse: new interpretations gained from modeling the maritime network. Antiquity 2011, 85:1008-1023.
50. New Approaches in Regional Network Analysis 2013, Oxford University Press, Oxford. C. Knappett, R. Rivers (Eds.).
51. Krackhardt D. Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Computational Organizational Theory 1994, 89-111. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. K.M. Carley, M.J. Prietula (Eds.).
52. Mills B.J., Roberts J.M., Clark J.J., Haas W.R., Huntley D.L., Peeples M.A., Borck L., Ryan S.C., Trowbridge M.A., Breiger R.L. The dynamics of social networks in the late prehispanic U.S. Southwest. New Approaches in Regional Network Analysis 2013, 185-206. Oxford University Press, Oxford. C. Knappett, R. Rivers (Eds.).
53. Mills, B.J., Clark, J.J., Peeples, M.A., Haas Jr., W.R., Roberts Jr., J.M., Hill, J.B., Huntley, D.L., Borck, L., Breiger, R.L., Clauset, A., Shackley, M.S. The transformation of social networks in the late prehispanic U.S. Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, in this issue.
54. Mitchell J.C. The concept and use of social networks. Social Networks in Urban Situations 1969, 1-50. Manchester University Press, Manchester. J.C. Mitchell (Ed.).
55. Mitchell J.C. Social networks. Annual Review of Anthropology 1974, 3:279-299.
56. Mizoguchi K. Nodes and edges: a network approach to hierarchisation and state formation in Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2009, 28:14-26.
57. Munson J.L., Macri M. Sociopolitical network interactions: a case study of the Classic Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2009, 28:424-438.
58. Nadel S.F. The Theory of Social Structure 1957, Free Press, Glencoe, ILL.
59. Newman M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E 2001, 64(016132).
60. Newman M.E.J. Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E 2004, 70:56131.
61. Opsahl T., Agneessens F., Skvoretz J. Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks 2010, 32:245-251.
62. Pailes M. Centrality and Household Economic and Political Success at a Thirteenth Century Hohokam Village 2012, Paper Presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Memphis.
63. Peeples M.A. Identity and Social Transformation in the Prehispanic Cibola World: A.D. 1150-1325 2011, PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University.
64. Peeples M.A., Haas W.R. Brokerage and social capital in the prehispanic U.S. Southwest. American Anthropologist 2013, 115(2):232-246.
65. Peregrine P. A graph-theoretic approach to the evolution of Cahokia. American Antiquity 1991, 56:66-75.
66. Phillips S.C. Networked Glass: Lithic Raw Material Consumption and Social Networks in the Kuril Islands, Far Eastern Russia 2011, Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
67. Pitts F.R. A graph theoretic approach to historical geography. The Professional Geographer 1965, 17:15-20.
68. Pitts F.R. The medieval river trade network of Russia revisited. Social Networks 1979, 1:285-292.
69. Radicchi F., Ramasco J.J., Fortunato S. Information filtering in complex weighted networks. Physical Review E 2011, 83:46101.
70. Rautman A. Resource variability, risk, and the structure of social networks: an example from the prehistoric Southwest. American Antiquity 1993, 58:403-424.
71. Rivers R., Knappett C., Evans T. What makes a site important? Centrality, gateways and gravity. New Approaches in Regional Network Analysis 2013, Oxford University Press, Oxford, (to be assigned). C. Knappett, R. Rivers (Eds.).
72. Roberts J.M., Mills B.J., Clark J.J., Haas W.R., Huntley D.L., Trowbridge M.A. A method for chronological apportioning of ceramic assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012, 39:1513-1520.
73. Robinson W.S. A method for chronologically ordering archaeological deposits. American Antiquity 1951, 16:293-301.
74. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 2003, The Free Press, New York.
75. Rothman M.S. Graph theory and the interpretation of regional survey data. Paléorient 1987, 13:73-91.
76. Santley R.S. The structure of the Aztec transport network. Ancient Road Networks and Settlement Hierarchies in the New World 1991, 198-210. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C.D. Trombold (Ed.).
77. Serrano M.á., Boguñá M., Vespignani A. Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:6483-6488.
78. Sindbæk S.M. Networks and nodal points: the emergence of towns in Early Viking Age Scandinavia. Antiquity 2007, 81:119-132.
79. Terrell J.E. Language and material culture on the Sepik Coast of Papua New Guinea: using social network analysis to simulate, graph, identify, and analyze social and cultural boundaries between communities. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 2010, 5:3-32.
80. Terrell J.E. Social network analysis of the genetic structure of Pacific islanders. Annals of Human Genetics 2010, 74:211-232.
81. Tumminello M., Aste T., Di Matteo T., Mantegna R.N. A tool for filtering information in complex systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102:10421-10426.
82. Valente T.W., Unger J.B., Johnson C.A. Do popular students smoke? the association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health 2005, 37:323-329.
83. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
84. Wilcox D.R., Doelle W.H., Hill J.B., Holmland J.P. Coalescent Communities GIS Database Version 1.0: Museum of Northern Arizona, Archaeology Southwest 2003, Western Mapping Company, Archaeology Southwest, Tucson.
85. Wolfe A. The rise of network thinking in anthropology. Social Networks 1978, 1:53-64.