Networks of networks: A citation network analysis of the adoption, use, and adaptation of formal network techniques in archaeology

Literary and Linguistic Computing

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 538-562

  Brughmans, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886438348     PISSN: 02681145     EISSN: 14774615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqt048     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Albert, R. and Barabási, A. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74: 47-97.
2. Bak, P., Tang, C., and Weisenfeld, K. (1987). Self-organized-criticality: an explanation of 1/F noise. Physical Review Letters, 59: 381-4.
3. Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus.
4. Barabási, A. L. and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286(5439): 509-12. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
5. Batagelj, V. (2000). Some analyses of Erdös collaboration graph. Social Networks, 22: 173-86.
6. Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient Algorithms for Citation Network Analysis. Arxiv Preprint, cs/030 9023: 1-27.
7. Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., and Doreian, P. (1992). Direct and Indirect Methods for Structural Equivalence. Social Networks, 14: 63-90.
8. Beaudry, M. and White, J. (1994). Cowgirls with the Blues? A Study of Women's Publication and the Citation of Women's Work in Historical Archaeology. In Claassen, C. (ed.), Women in Archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 138-58.
9. Bentley, R., Lake, M., and Shennan, S. (2005). Specialisation and wealth inequality in a model of a clustered economic network. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32(9): 1346-56. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.03.008.
10. Bentley, R. and Maschner, H. (2000). A growing network of ideas. Fractals, 8(3): 227-237.
11. Bentley, R. A. and Maschner, H. D. G. (2001). Stylistic change as a self-organized critical phenomenon: An archaeological study in complexity. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 8(1): 35-66.
12. Bentley, R. A. and Shennan, S. J. (2003). Cultural transmission and stochastic network growth. American Antiquity, 68(3): 459-485.
13. Boast, R. and Biehl, P. (2011). Archaeological knowledge production and dissemination in the digital age. InKansa, E. C., Kansa, S. W., and Watrall, E. (eds), Archaeology 2.0. New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration. Los Angeles: UCLA Press, pp. 119-156.
14. Borner, K., Maru, J. T., and Goldstone, R. L. (2004). The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks. PNAS, 101: 5266-527.
15. Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Brughmans, T. (2010). Connecting the dots: towards archaeological network analysis. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 29(3): 277-303.
17. Brughmans, T. (2013). Thinking through networks: a review of formal network methods in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 20(3). doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8.
18. Brughmans, T. (2012). Facebooking the Past: a critical social network analysis approach for archaeology. In Chrysanthi, A., Flores, M. P., and Papadopoulos, C. (eds), Thinking beyond the Tool: Archaeological Computing and the Interpretative Process. British Archaeological Reports International Series. Oxford: Archaeopress.
19. Butzer, K. W. (2009). Evolution of an interdisciplinary enterprise: the Journal of Archaeological Science at 35 years. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(9): 1842-6. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.04.011.
20. Choi, J. M. (1988). Citation Analysis of Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication Patterns of Anthropology in the U.S.A. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 6(3-4): 65-84. doi:10.1300/ J103v06n03_04.
21. Clark, B. M. and Clark, S. E. (1982). Core journals in anthropology. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 2(2-3): 95-110. doi:10.1300/J103v02n02_06.
22. Cross, M. C. and Hohenberg, P. C. (1993). Pattern-formation outside of equilibrium. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65: 851-1112.
23. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., and Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Eom, Y. H. and Fortunato, S. (2011). Characterizing and modeling citation dynamics. In Perc, M. (ed.), PLoS One, 6(9): e24926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024926.
25. Erdo00 s, P. and Renyi, A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5: 17-61.
26. Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3-5): 75-174. doi:10.1016/ j.physrep.2009.11.002.
27. Freeman, L. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
28. Garfield, E., Irving, H. S., and Richard, J. T. (1964). The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science. Director. Philadelphia: Institute for scientific information.
29. Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., and Istomin, V. S. (2003). Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5): 400-412. Wiley Online Library.
30. Garner, R. (1967). A computer-oriented graph theoretic analysis of citation index structures. In Flood, B. (ed.), Three Drexel Information Science Research Studies. Philadelphia: Drexel press, pp. 3-46.
31. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(5): 1360-80.
32. Hanneman, R. A. and Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California: Riverside.
33. Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
34. Hummon, N. P. and Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1): 39-63.
35. Hummon, N. P., Doreian, P., and Freeman, L. C. (1990). Analyzing the Structure of the Centrality-Productivity Literature Created Between 1948 and 1979. Science Communication, 11(4): 459-80. doi:10.1177/ 107554709001100405.
36. Hutson, S. (2002). Gendered citation practices in American Antiquity and other archaeology journals. American Antiquity, 67(2): 331-42.
37. Hutson, S. R. (2006). Self-Citation in Archaeology: Age, Gender, Prestige, and the Self. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13(1): 1-18. doi:10.1007/s10816-006-9001-5.
38. Irwin-Williams, C. (1977). A network model for the analysis of Prehistoric trade. In Earle, T. K. and Ericson, J. E. (eds), Exchange systems in Prehistory. New York: Academic Press, pp. 141-51.
39. Jin, E. M., Girvan, M., and Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Structure of growing social networks. Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 64(4 Pt 2): 046132.
40. Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5): 604-632.
41. Knappett, C. (2011a). An archaeology of Interaction. Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Knievel, J. E. and Kellsey, C. (2005). Citation analysis for collection development: a comparative study of eight humanities fields. The Library Quarterly, 75(2): 142-68. doi:10.1086/431331.
43. Kochen, M. (1989). The Small World. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44. Korte, C. and Milgram, S. (1970). Acquaintance networks between racial groups-application of the small world method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(2): 101
45. Leydesdorff, L., Hammarfelt, B., and Salah, A. (2011). The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12): 2414-26. doi:10.1002/asi.
46. Lock, G. and Pouncett, J. (2007). Network analysis in archaeology session introduction: and introduction to network analysis. In Clark, J. T. and Hagenmeister, E. M. (eds), Digital discovery: exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 71-3.
47. Marriner, N. (2009). Currents and trends in the archaeological sciences. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(12): 2811-15. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.009.
48. Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social Networks, 24(4): 407-422.
49. May, K., Binding, C., Tudhope, D., and Jeffrey, S. (2012). Semantic Technologies Enhancing Links and Linked Data for Archaeological Resources. In Zhou, M., Romanowska, I., Wu, Z., Xu, P., and Verhagen, P. (eds), Revive the Past: Proceedings of Computer Applications and Quantitative Techniques in Archaeology Conference 2011, Beijing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 261-272.
50. McBrearty, S. and Brooks, A. S. (2000). The Revolution that Wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39: 453-563.
51. Milgram, S. (1967). The Small World Problem. Psychology Today, 2: 60-7.
52. Nederhof, A. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: a review. Scientometrics, 66(1): 81-100.
53. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl): 5200-5. doi:10.1073/ pnas.0307545100.
54. Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Pouncett, J. and Lock, G. (2007). A vector-based approach to the integration of geophysical and test-pitting data: phasing the South Cadbury environs project. In Clark, E. M. and Hagenmeister, J. T. (eds), Digital discovery: exploring new frontiers in human heritage. Proceedings of the 34th CAA conference, Fargo, 2006. Budapest, pp. 97-106.
56. Rehren, T., Grattan, J., and Klein, R. (2008). Going strong, and growing. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35: 94305. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.11.026.
57. Robinson, W. and Posten, P. (2005). Literature use of scholars publishing in leading anthropology periodicals. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 37-41.
58. Richards, J., Jeffrey, S., Waller, S., Ciravegna, F., Chapman, S., and Zhang, Z. (2011). The Archaeology Data Service and the Archaeotools project: faceted classification and natural language processing. In Kansa, E. C., Kansa, S. W., and Watrall, E. (eds), Archaeology 2.0. New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration. Los Angeles: UCLA Press, pp. 31-56.
59. Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
60. Rosenswig, R. (2005). A tale of two antiquities: evolving editorial policies of the SAA journals. The SAA Archeological Record, 5(1): 15-21.
61. Rosvall, M. and Bergstrom, C. T. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. PNAS, 105: 1118-1123.
62. Schich, M. and Coscia, M. (2011). Exploring co-occurrence on a meso and global level using network analysis and rule mining. Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Mining and Learning with Graphs (MLG '11). San Diego: ACM.
63. Schich, M., Hidalgo, C. A., Lehmann, S. J., and Park, J. (2009). The Network of Subject Co-Popularity in Classical Archaeology. Bollettino di Archeologia on line, 49-57.
64. Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis. A Handbook. 2nd edn. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
65. Smoot, M., Ono, K., Ruscheinski, J., Wang, P. L., and Ideker, T. (2011). Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics, 27(3): 431-32.
66. Sterud, E. (1978). Changing Aims of Americanist Archaeology: a citations analysis of American antiquity. 1946-1975. American Antiquity, 43(2): 294-302.
67. Terrell, J. E. (1976). Island biogeography and man in Melanesia. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania, 11(1): 1-17.
68. Terrell, J. E. (1977b). Human biogeography in the Solomon Islands. Fieldiana Anthropology, 68(1): 1-47
69. Travers, J. and Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32(4): 425-443.
70. Victor, K. and Beaudry, M. (1992). Women's participation in American Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology: a comparative look at the Journals American Antiquity and Historical Archaeology. In Claassen, C. (ed.), Exploring Gender Through Archaeology. Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory Press, pp. 11-22.
71. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Watts, D. J. and Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of "small-world"networks. Nature, 393(6684): 440-2. doi:10.1038/30918.
73. Wells, P. S. (2005). Creating an imperial frontier: archaeology of the Formation of Rome's Danube Borderland. Journal of Archaeological Research, 13(1): 49-88. doi:10.1007/s10814-005-0810-y.
74. White, H. D. (2011). Scientific and scholarly networks. In Scott, J. and Carrington, P. J. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 272-285.
75. White, H. C., Boormann, S., and Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks: I.Blockmodells of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4): 730-80.
76. Xia, J. (2011). Open access for archaeological literature: a manager's perspective. In Kansa, E. C., Kansa, S. W., and Watrall, E. (eds), Archaeology 2.0. New Approaches to Communication And Collaboration. Los Angeles: UCLA Press, pp. 233-249.
77. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Reading (Mass): Addison-Wesley.
78. Modelling and prediction with geographic information systems: a demographic example from prehistoric and historic New York. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds), Interpreting Apace: GIS and Archaeology. London; New York; Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, pp. 307-318