High-resolution imaging of cellular processes across textured surfaces using an indexed-matched elastomer

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 14, Issue , 2015, Pages 53-60

  Ravasio, Andrea ^a   Vaishnavi, Sree ^a   Ladoux, Benoit ^a,c   Viasnoff, Virgile ^a,b,d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c INSTITUT JACQUES MONOD   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Epithelial cell; Microstructure; Stress analysis; Surface texture

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; REFRACTIVE INDEX; STEM CELLS; SUBSTRATES;

CELLS ADHESION; CELLULAR PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL SENSING; EPITHELIAL CELLS; HIGH-RESOLUTION IMAGING; MICROENVIRONMENTS; SENSING PROCESS; STRESSES ANALYSIS; SURFACE TEXTURES; TEXTURED SURFACE;

STRESS ANALYSIS;

ELASTOMER; NANOMATERIAL; PHOTOINITIATOR; RESIN; ACTIN; FIBRONECTIN; NANOPARTICLE;

ARTICLE; CELL BODY; CELL CONTACT; CELL SHAPE; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CHROMOSOME; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOTOXICITY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FIBROBLAST; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VITRO STUDY; MDCK CELL LINE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MICROFILM; MITOSIS; NANOFABRICATION; PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION INDEX; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WILD TYPE; YOUNG MODULUS; 3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DOG; DRUG EFFECTS; EPITHELIUM CELL; LIGHT RELATED PHENOMENA; METABOLISM; MOUSE; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CELL COMMUNICATION; DOGS; ELASTOMERS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MADIN DARBY CANINE KIDNEY CELLS; MICE; NANOPARTICLES; NIH 3T3 CELLS; OPTICAL PHENOMENA; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84921833742     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005;310:1139-43.
2. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89.
3. Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006;7:265-75.
4. Engler A, Sen S, Sweeney H, Discher D. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89.
5. Yim EK, Sheetz MP. Force-dependent cell signaling in stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther 2012;3:41.
6. Trappmann B, Gautrot JE, Connelly JT, Strange DG, Li Y, Oyen ML, et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2012;11:642-9.
7. Kubow KE, Klotzsch E, Smith ML, Gourdon D, Little WC, Vogel V. Crosslinking of cell-derived 3D scaffolds up-regulates the stretching and unfolding of new extracellular matrix assembled by reseeded cells. Integr Biol 2009;1:635-48.
8. Baker BM, Chen CS. Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci 2012;125:3015-24.
9. Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Richert A, Hersen P, Ladoux B. Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration. Biophys J 2009;97:357-68.
10. Legoff L, Rouault H, Lecuit T. A global pattern of mechanical stress polarizes cell divisions and cell shape in the growing Drosophila wing disc. Development 2013;140:4051-9.
11. Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Hawkins RJ, Vedula SR, Gupta M, Ribrault C, et al. Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:6933-8.
12. Ingber DE. Mechanical signaling and the cellular response to extracellular matrix in angiogenesis and cardiovascular physiology. Circ Res 2002;91:877-87.
13. Rivron N, Vrij E, Rouwkema J, Le Gac S, van den Berg A, Truckenmüller R, et al. Tissue deformation spatially modulates VEGF signaling and angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:6886-91.
14. Nelson CM, Jean RP, Tan JL, Liu WF, Sniadecki NJ, Spector AA, et al. Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:11594-9.
15. Guillot C, Lecuit T. Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis. Science 2013;340:1185-9.
16. Bornens M. Organelle positioning and cell polarity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008;9:874-86.
17. Saez A, Ghibaudo M, Buguin A, Silberzan P, Ladoux B. Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:8281-6.
18. du Roure O, Dequidt C, Richert A, Austin RH, Buguin A, Chavrier P, et al. Microfabricated arrays of elastomeric posts to study cellular mechanics. 2004:26-34.
19. Yang MT, Fu J, Wang YK, Desai RA, Chen CS. Assaying stem cell mechanobiology on microfabricated elastomeric substrates with geometrically modulated rigidity. Nat Protoc 2011;6:187-213.
20. Ankam S, Suryana M, Chan LY, Moe AA, Teo BK, Law JB, et al. Substrate topography and size determine the fate of human embryonic stem cells to neuronal or glial lineage. Acta Biomater 2013;9:4535-45.
21. Moe AA, Suryana M, Marcy G, Lim SK, Ankam S, Goh JZ, et al. Microarray with micro- and nano-topographies enables identification of the optimal topography for directing the differentiation of primary murine neural progenitor cells. Small 2012;8:3050-61.
22. Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, Goichberg P, Tzur G, Sabanay I, et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:466-72.
23. Lee J, Leonard M, Oliver T, Ishihara A, Jacobson K. Traction forces generated by locomoting keratocytes. J Cell Biol 1994;127:1957-64.
24. Tambe DT, Hardin CC, Angelini TE, Rajendran K, Park CY, Serra-Picamal X, et al. Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nat Mater 2011;10:469-75.
25. Cole RW, Jinadasa T, Brown CM. Measuring and interpreting point spread functions to determine confocal microscope resolution and ensure quality control. Nat Protoc 2011;6:1929-41.
26. Gumbiner B, Stevenson B, Grimaldi A. The role of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in the formation and maintenance of the epithelial junctional complex. J Cell Biol 1988;107:1575-87.
27. Gumbiner B. Cadherins: a family of Ca2+-dependent adhesion molecules. Trends Biochem Sci 1988;13:75-6.
28. Gauthier NC, Fardin MA, Roca-Cusachs P, Sheetz MP. Temporary increase in plasma membrane tension coordinates the activation of exocytosis and contraction during cell spreading. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:14467-72.
29. Saez A, Anon E, Ghibaudo M, du Roure O, Di Meglio JM, Hersen P, et al. Traction forces exerted by epithelial cell sheets. J Phys: Condens Matter 2010;22:194119.
30. He SSY, Ji B, Gao H. Some basic questions on mechanosensing in cell-substrate interaction. J Mech Phys Solids 2014;70:116-35.
31. Ehrlich JS, Hansen MD, Nelson WJ. Spatio-temporal regulation of Rac1 localization and lamellipodia dynamics during epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Dev Cell 2002;3:259-70.