Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: A multicenter study

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 524-530

  Dalén, Magnus ^a   Biancari, Fausto ^b   Rubino, Antonino S ^c   Santarpino, Giuseppe ^d   De Praetere, Herbert ^e   Kasama, Keiichiro ^e   Juvonen, Tatu ^b   Deste, Wanda ^c   Pollari, Francesco ^d   Meuris, Bart ^e   Fischlein, Theodor ^d   Mignosa, Carmelo ^c   Gatti, Giuseppe ^f   Pappalardo, Aniello ^f   Sartipy, Ulrik ^a   Svenarud, Peter ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^d KLINIKUM NÜRNBERG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^f OSPEDALI RIUNITI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; ERYTHROCYTE CONCENTRATE; FEMALE; FULL STERNOTOMY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN AORTIC VALVE GRADIENT; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MINISTERNOTOMY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PARAVALVULAR REGURGITATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PEAK AORTIC VALVE GRADIENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTHESIS DISLODGEMENT; REOPERATION; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; SURVIVAL; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AORTA VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; SURGERY; SUTURE;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STERNOTOMY; SUTURES;

EID: 84921743083     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.08.028     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. B. Murtuza, J.R. Pepper, and R.D. Stanbridge Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? Ann Thorac Surg 85 2008 1121 1131
2. M.L. Brown, S.H. McKellar, T.M. Sundt, and H.V. Schaff Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 2009 670 679
3. D. Gilmanov, S. Bevilacqua, and M. Murzi Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 837 843
4. N. Furukawa, O. Kuss, and A. Aboud Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46 2014 221 226
5. N. Al-Sarraf, L. Thalib, and A. Hughes Cross-clamp time is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in low- and high-risk cardiac patients Int J Surg 9 2011 104 109
6. M. Ranucci, A. Frigiola, and L. Menicanti Aortic cross-clamp time, new prostheses, and outcome in aortic valve replacement J Heart Valve Dis 21 2012 732 739
7. T.A. Folliguet, F. Laborde, and K. Zannis Sutureless Perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers Ann Thorac Surg 93 2012 1483 1488
8. G. Santarpino, S. Pfeiffer, and G. Concistre The Perceval S aortic valve has the potential of shortening surgical time: does it also result in improved outcome? Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 77 81
9. A. Miceli, G. Santarpino, and S. Pfeiffer Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve: early outcomes and one-year survival from two European centers J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.085 [Epub ahead of print]
10. A. Rubino, G. Santarpino, and H. De Praetere Early and intermediate outcome with sutureless Perceval aortic valve bioprosthesis: results of a multicenter study J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 2014 865 871
11. S.A. Nashef, F. Roques, and L.D. Sharples EuroSCORE II Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41 2012 734 744
12. D.A. Cooley Minimally invasive valve surgery versus the conventional approach Ann Thorac Surg 66 1998 1101 1105
13. F. Pollari, G. Santarpino, and A. Dell'Aquila Better short-term outcome by using sutureless valves: A propensity-matched score analysis Ann Thorac Surg 98 2014 611 617
14. D.C. Miller, E.H. Blackstone, and M.J. Mack Transcatheter (TAVR) versus surgical (AVR) aortic valve replacement: occurrence, hazard, risk factors, and consequences of neurologic events in the PARTNER trial J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143 2012 832 843
15. M. Gilard, H. Eltchaninoff, and B. Iung Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 366 2012 1705 1715