Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve: Early outcomes and one-year survival from two European centers

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 148, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 2838-2843

  Miceli, Antonio ^a,b   Santarpino, Giuseppe ^b,c   Pfeiffer, Steffen ^b,c   Murzi, Michele ^a   Gilmanov, Daniyar ^a   Concistré, Giovanni ^b,c   Quaini, Eugenio ^a   Solinas, Marco ^a   Fischlein, Theodor ^b,c   Glauber, Mattia ^a  

^a Fondazione Toscana G Monasterio   (Italy)

^b KLINIKUM NÜRNBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; BLEEDING; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; STERNOTOMY; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT PLANNING; AORTA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EUROPE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STERNOTOMY; THORACOTOMY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84920150929     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.085     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J.M. Brown, S.M. O'Brien, C. Wu, J.A. Sikora, B.P. Griffith, and J.S. Gammie Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons national database J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 2009 82 90
2. B. Bridgewater, J. Gummert, R. Kinsman, and P. Walton Towards Global Benchmarking: The Fourth EACTS Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report 2010 Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
3. J.D. Schmitto, S.A. Mokashi, and L.H. Cohn Minimally-invasive valve surgery J Am Coll Cardiol 56 2010 455 462
4. B. Murtuza, J.R. Pepper, R.D. Stanbridge, C. Jones, C. Rao, and A. Darzi Minimally access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? Ann Thorac Surg 85 2008 1121 1131
5. M.L. Brown, S.H. McKellar, T.M. Sundt, and H.V. Schaff Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 2009 670 679
6. M. Tabata, R. Umakanthan, L.H. Cohn, R.M. Bolman III, P.S. Shekar, and F.Y. Chen Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33 2008 537 541
7. M. Glauber, A. Miceli, D. Gilmanov, M. Ferrarini, S. Bevilacqua, and P.A. Farneti Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145 2013 1222 1226
8. D.A. Cooley Minimally invasive valve surgery versus the conventional approach Ann Thorac Surg 66 1998 1101 1105
9. S. Foghsgaard, T.A. Schmidt, and H.K. Kjaergard Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: late conversion to full sternotomy doubles operative time Tex Heart Inst J 36 2009 293 297
10. N. Al-Sarraf, L. Thalib, M. Houlihan, M. Tolan, V. Young, and E. McGovern Cross-clamp time is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in low-and high-risk cardiac patients Int J Surg 9 2011 104 109
11. M. Ranucci, A. Frigiola, L. Menicanti, S. Castelvecchio, C. de Vincentiis, and V. Pistuddi Aortic cross-clamp time, new prostheses, and outcome in aortic valve replacement J Heart Valve Dis 21 2012 732 739
12. W. Flameng, M.C. Herregods, H. Hermans, G. Van der Mieren, M. Vercalsteren, and G. Poortmans Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 2011 1453 1457
13. T.A. Folliguet, F. Laborde, K. Zannis, G. Ghorayeb, A. Haverich, and M. Shrestha Sutureless Perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers Ann Thorac Surg 93 2012 1483 1488
14. G. Santarpino, S. Pfeiffer, J. Schmidt, G. Concistrè, and T. Fischlein Sutureless aortic valve replacement: first-year single center experience Ann Thorac Surg 94 2012 504 509
15. M. Shrestha, R. Timm, K. Höffeler, N. Koigeldiyev, N. Khaladj, and C. Hagl Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with self-anchoring Perceval valve J Heart Valve Dis 22 2013 230 235
16. M. Glauber, A. Miceli, S. Bevilacqua, and P.A. Farneti Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right anterior minithoracotomy: early outcomes and midterm follow-up J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 2011 1577 1579
17. G. Santarpino, S. Pfeiffer, G. Concistrè, and T. Fischlein Perceval S aortic valve implantation in mini-invasive surgery: the simple sutureless solution Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 15 2012 357 360
18. J.H. Karimov, F. Santarelli, M. Murzi, and M. Glauber A technique of an upper V-type ministernotomy in the second intercostal space Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 9 2009 1021 1022
19. Miceli A, Murzi M, Gilmanov D, Fugà R, Ferrarini M, Solinas M, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using right minithoracotomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
20. Gilmanov D, Farneti PA, Miceli A, Bevilacqua S, Glauber M. Perceval S sutureless aortic valve prosthesis implantation via a right anterior minithoracotomy. Multimedia Manual Cardiothorac Surg. Epub 2013 Jul 12; doi:10.1093/mmcts/mmt012.
21. G. Santarpino, S. Pfeiffer, G. Concistrè, I. Grossmann, M. Hinzmann, and T. Fischlein The Perceval S aortic valve has the potential of shortening surgical time: does it also result in improved outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 77 82
22. J.M. Brennan, F.H. Edwards, Y. Zhao, S.M. O'Brien, P.S. Douglas, E.D. Peterson Developing Evidence to Inform Decision About Effectiveness - Aortic Valve Replacement (DEcIDE AVR) Research Team Long-term survival after aortic valve replacement among high-risk elderly patients in the United States. Insight from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database, 1991 to 2007 Circulation 126 2012 1621 1629
23. D.C. Miller, E.H. Blackstone, M.J. Mack, L.G. Svensson, S.K. Kodali, and S. Kapadia Transcatheter (TAVR) versus surgical (AVR) aortic valve replacement: occurrence, hazard, risk factors, and consequences of neurological events in the PARTNER trial J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143 2012 832 843
24. M. Neyt, H. Van Brabandt, S. Devriese, and S. Van De Sande A cost-utility analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Belgium: focusing on a well-defined and identifiable population BMJ Open 2 2012 e001032
25. A. D'Onofrio, A. Mesina, R. Lorusso, O.R. Alfieri, M. Fusari, and P. Rubino Sutureless aortic valve replacement as an alternative treatment for patients belonging to the "gray zone" between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and conventional surgery: a propensity-matched, multicenter analysis J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144 2012 1010 1018
26. L. Pradelli, and O. Zaniolo Perceval Sutureless valves in isolated and concomitant AVR procedures: an economic model shows overall decrease of costs for isolated or combined operations Farmeconomia. Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways 13 2012 159 174
27. W.A. Zoghbi, J.B. Chambers, J.G. Dusmenil, E. Foster, J.S. Gottdiener, and P.A. Grayburn Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 2009 975 1014