Invited commentary: Repeated measures, selection bias, and effect identification in neighborhood effect studies

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 180, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 785-787

  Oakes, J Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal; Counterfactual; Dynamic; Methodology

Indexed keywords

DATA INTERPRETATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; INNOVATION; MODEL TEST; NEIGHBORHOOD; RESEARCH WORK; SAMPLING BIAS;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; NEIGHBORHOOD; REPEATED MEASUREMENT; SELECTION BIAS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH DISPARITY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; POPULATION DYNAMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS DISPARITIES; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84921727662     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu231     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Jokela M. Are neighborhood health associations causal? A 10-year prospective cohort study with repeated measurements. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(8):776-784.
2. Oakes JM. The (mis) estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(10):1929-1952.
3. Harper S, Strumpf EC. Commentary: social epidemiology: questionable answers and answerable questions. Epidemiology. 2012;23(6):795-798.
4. Galea S. An argument for a consequentialist epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(8):1185-1191.
5. Glass TA. Commentary: culture in epidemiology-the 800 pound gorilla? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(2):259-261.