A flipped ion pair at the dynein-microtubule interface is critical for dynein motility and ATPase activation

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 208, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 211-222

  Uchimura, Seiichi ^a   Fujii, Takashi ^b,c,f   Takazaki, Hiroko ^a,b   Ayukawa, Rie ^a   Nishikawa, Yosuke ^b   Minoura, Itsushi ^a   Hachikubo, You ^a   Kurisu, Genji ^b   Sutoh, Kazuo ^d   Kon, Takahide ^b,c,e   Namba, Keiichi ^b,f   Muto, Etsuko ^a  

^a RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^d WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e HOSEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f INST OF PHYS AND CHEMICAL RESEARCH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ALANINE; ALPHA TUBULIN; BETA TUBULIN; DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; KINESIN; MOLECULAR MOTOR; SODIUM CHLORIDE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTOZOAL PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MICROTUBULE; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SWINE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DICTYOSTELIUM; PIG; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; DICTYOSTELIUM; DYNEINS; ENZYME ACTIVATION; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTOZOAN PROTEINS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84921713912     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201407039     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Burgess, S.A., M.L. Walker, H. Sakakibara, P.J. Knight, and K. Oiwa 2003. Dynein structure and power stroke. Nature. 421:715-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01377
2. Carter, A.P., J.E. Garbarino, E.M. Wilson-Kubalek, W.E. Shipley, C. Cho, R.A. Milligan, R.D. Vale, and I.R. Gibbons 2008. Structure and functional role of dynein's microtubule-binding domain. Science. 322:1691-1695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1164424
3. Carter, A.P., C. Cho, L. Jin, and R.D. Vale. 2011. Crystal structure of the dynein motor domain. Science. 331:1159-1165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1202393
4. Chalfie, M. 1982. Microtubule structure in Caenorhabditis elegans neurons. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 46:255-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1982.046.01.028
5. Chalfie, M., and M. Au. 1989. Genetic control of differentiation of the Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons. Science. 243:1027-1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2646709
6. Chrétien, D., and R.H. Wade. 1991. New data on the microtubule surface lattice. Biol. Cell. 71:161-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0248-4900(91)90062-R
7. Davis, A., C.R. Sage, L. Wilson, and K.W. Farrell. 1993. Purification and biochemical characterization of tubulin from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry. 32:8823-8835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00085a013
8. DeWitt, M.A., A.Y. Chang, P.A. Combs, and A. Yildiz. 2012. Cytoplasmic dynein moves through uncoordinated stepping of the AAA+ ring domains. Science. 335:221-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1215804
9. Egelman, E.H. 2007. The iterative helical real space reconstruction method: surmounting the problems posed by real polymers. J. Struct. Biol. 157:83-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.015
10. Emsley, P., and K. Cowtan. 2004. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60:2126-2132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158
11. Eshel, D., L.A. Urrestarazu, S. Vissers, J.C. Jauniaux, J.C. van Vliet-Reedijk, R.J. Planta, and I.R. Gibbons. 1993. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for normal nuclear segregation in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:11172-11176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.23.11172
12. Fujii, T., A.H. Iwane, T. Yanagida, and K. Namba. 2010. Direct visualization of secondary structures of F-actin by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature. 467:724-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09372
13. Gibbons, I.R. 1981. Cilia and flagella of eukaryotes. J. Cell Biol. 91:107s-124s. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.91.3.107s
14. Gibbons, I.R., J.E. Garbarino, C.E. Tan, S.L. Reck-Peterson, R.D. Vale, and A.P. Carter. 2005. The affinity of the dynein microtubule-binding domain is modulated by the conformation of its coiled-coil stalk. J. Biol. Chem. 280:23960-23965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M501636200
15. Gupta, M.L. Jr., C.J. Bode, G.I. Georg, and R.H. Himes. 2003. Understanding tubulin-Taxol interactions: mutations that impart Taxol binding to yeast tubulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:6394-6397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1131967100
16. Harada, Y., K. Sakurada, T. Aoki, D.D. Thomas, and T. Yanagida. 1990. Mechanochemical coupling in actomyosin energy transduction studied by in vitro movement assay. J. Mol. Biol. 216:49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80060-9
17. Höök, P., and R.B. Vallee. 2006. The dynein family at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 119:4369-4371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03176
18. Hyman, A., D. Drechsel, D. Kellogg, S. Salser, K. Sawin, P. Steffen, L. Wordeman, and T. Mitchison. 1991. Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 196:478-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(91)96041-O
19. Keays, D.A., G. Tian, K. Poirier, G.J. Huang, C. Siebold, J. Cleak, P.L. Oliver, M. Fray, R.J. Harvey, Z. Molnár, et al. 2007. Mutations in α-tubulin cause abnormal neuronal migration in mice and lissencephaly in humans. Cell. 128:45-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.017
20. Kodama, T., K. Fukui, and K. Kometani. 1986. The initial phosphate burst in ATP hydrolysis by myosin and subfragment-1 as studied by a modified malachite green method for determination of inorganic phosphate. J. Biochem. 99:1465-1472.
21. Kon, T., T. Mogami, R. Ohkura, M. Nishiura, and K. Sutoh. 2005. ATP hydrolysis cycle-dependent tail motions in cytoplasmic dynein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:513-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb930
22. Kon, T., K. Imamula, A.J. Roberts, R. Ohkura, P.J. Knight, I.R. Gibbons, S.A. Burgess, and K. Sutoh. 2009a. Helix sliding in the stalk coiled coil of dynein couples ATPase and microtubule binding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:325-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1555
23. Kon, T., T. Shima, and K. Sutoh. 2009b. Protein engineering approaches to study the dynein mechanism using a Dictyostelium expression system. Methods Cell Biol. 92:65-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)92005-7
24. Kon, T., T. Oyama, R. Shimo-Kon, K. Imamula, T. Shima, K. Sutoh, and G. Kurisu. 2012. The 2.8 Å crystal structure of the dynein motor domain. Nature. 484:345-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10955
25. Koonce, M.P., and I. Tikhonenko. 2000. Functional elements within the dynein microtubule-binding domain. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:523-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.2.523
26. Li, Y.Y., E. Yeh, T. Hays, and K. Bloom. 1993. Disruption of mitotic spindle orientation in a yeast dynein mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:10096-10100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.21.10096
27. Löwe, J., H. Li, K.H. Downing, and E. Nogales. 2001. Refined structure of α β-tubulin at 3.5 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 313:1045-1057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.5077
28. Ma, Y.Z., and E.W. Taylor. 1995. Mechanism of microtubule kinesin ATPase. Biochemistry. 34:13242-13251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00040a040
29. Mallik, R., and S.P. Gross. 2004. Molecular motors: strategies to get along. Curr. Biol. 14:R971-R982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.046
30. Meng, E.C., E.F. Pettersen, G.S. Couch, C.C. Huang, and T.E. Ferrin. 2006. Tools for integrated sequence-structure analysis with UCSF Chimera. BMC Bioinformatics. 7:339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-339
31. Mindell, J.A., and N. Grigorieff. 2003. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142:334-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8477(03)00069-8
32. Minoura, I., E. Katayama, K. Sekimoto, and E. Muto. 2010. One-dimensional Brownian motion of charged nanoparticles along microtubules: a model system for weak binding interactions. Biophys. J. 98:1589-1597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4323
33. Minoura, I., Y. Hachikubo, Y. Yamakita, H. Takazaki, R. Ayukawa, S. Uchimura, and E. Muto. 2013. Overexpression, purification, and functional analysis of recombinant human tubulin dimer. FEBS Lett. 587:3450-3455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.08.032
34. Mizuno, N., S. Toba, M. Edamatsu, J. Watai-Nishii, N. Hirokawa, Y.Y. Toyoshima, and M. Kikkawa. 2004. Dynein and kinesin share an overlapping microtubule-binding site. EMBO J. 23:2459-2467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600240
35. Nishikawa, Y., T. Oyama, N. Kamiya, T. Kon, Y.Y. Toyoshima, H. Nakamura, and G. Kurisu. 2014. Structure of the entire stalk region of the Dynein motor domain. J. Mol. Biol. 426:3232-3245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2014.06.023
36. Numata, N., T. Shima, R. Ohkura, T. Kon, and K. Sutoh. 2011. C-sequence of the Dictyostelium cytoplasmic dynein participates in processivity modulation. FEBS Lett. 585:1185-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.036
37. Pellman, D., M. Bagget, Y.H. Tu, G.R. Fink, and H. Tu. 1995. Two microtubuleassociated proteins required for anaphase spindle movement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 130:1373-1385. (published erratum appears in J. Cell Biol. 1995. 131:561) http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.130.6.1373
38. Qiu, W., N.D. Derr, B.S. Goodman, E. Villa, D. Wu, W. Shih, and S.L. Reck-Peterson. 2012. Dynein achieves processive motion using both stochastic and coordinated stepping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:193-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2205
39. Redwine, W.B., R. Hernández-López, S. Zou, J. Huang, S.L. Reck-Peterson, and A.E. Leschziner. 2012. Structural basis for microtubule binding and release by dynein. Science. 337:1532-1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1224151
40. Roberts, A.J., T. Kon, P.J. Knight, K. Sutoh, and S.A. Burgess. 2013. Functions and mechanics of dynein motor proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14:713-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3667
41. Rothwell, S.W., W.A. Grasser, and D.B. Murphy. 1986. End-to-end annealing of microtubules in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 102:619-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.102.2.619
42. Saunders, W.S., D. Koshland, D. Eshel, I.R. Gibbons, and M.A. Hoyt. 1995. Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinesin- and dynein-related proteins required for anaphase chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 128:617-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.128.4.617
43. Shima, T., K. Imamula, T. Kon, R. Ohkura, and K. Sutoh. 2006. Head-head coordination is required for the processive motion of cytoplasmic dynein, an AAA+ molecular motor. J. Struct. Biol. 156:182-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2006.03.014
44. Sindelar, C.V., and K.H. Downing. 2007. The beginning of kinesin's forcegenerating cycle visualized at 9-Å resolution. J. Cell Biol. 177:377-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200612090
45. Thorn, K.S., J.A. Ubersax, and R.D. Vale. 2000. Engineering the processive run length of the kinesin motor. J. Cell Biol. 151:1093-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.5.1093
46. Topf, M., K. Lasker, B. Webb, H. Wolfson, W. Chiu, and A. Sali. 2008. Protein structure fitting and refinement guided by cryo-EM density. Structure. 16:295-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2007.11.016
47. Uchimura, S., Y. Oguchi, M. Katsuki, T. Usui, H. Osada, J. Nikawa, S. Ishiwata, and E. Muto. 2006. Identification of a strong binding site for kinesin on the microtubule using mutant analysis of tubulin. EMBO J. 25:5932-5941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601442
48. Uchimura, S., Y. Oguchi, Y. Hachikubo, S. Ishiwata, and E. Muto. 2010. Key residues on microtubule responsible for activation of kinesin ATPase. EMBO J. 29:1167-1175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.25
49. Unni, S., Y. Huang, R.M. Hanson, M. Tobias, S. Krishnan, W.W. Li, J.E. Nielsen, and N.A. Baker. 2011. Web servers and services for electrostatics calculations with APBS and PDB2PQR. J. Comput. Chem. 32:1488-1491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21720
50. Vale, R.D., D.R. Soll, and I.R. Gibbons. 1989. One-dimensional diffusion of microtubules bound to flagellar dynein. Cell. 59:915-925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90614-4
51. Vallee, R.B., C. Tai, and N.E. Faulkner. 2001. LIS1: cellular function of a disease-causing gene. Trends Cell Biol. 11:155-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(01)01956-0
52. Wang, P.J., and T.C. Huffaker. 1997. Stu2p: a microtubule-binding protein that is an essential component of the yeast spindle pole body. J. Cell Biol. 139:1271-1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.139.5.1271
53. Wang, Z., and G.F. Schröder. 2012. Real-space refinement with DireX: from global fitting to side-chain improvements. Biopolymers. 97:687-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.22046
54. Wang, Z., and M.P. Sheetz. 2000. The C-terminus of tubulin increases cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin processivity. Biophys. J. 78:1955-1964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76743-9
55. Yonekura, K., M.B. Braunfeld, S. Maki-Yonekura, and D.A. Agard. 2006. Electron energy filtering significantly improves amplitude contrast of frozenhydrated protein at 300 kV. J. Struct. Biol. 156:524-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2006.07.016