Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for evaluation of combined heat and power units

Energies

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 59-78

  Wang, Haichao ^a   Jiao, Wenling ^b   Lahdelma, Risto ^a   Zhu, Chuanzhi ^c   Zou, Pinghua ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c JILIN JIANZHU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Combined heat and power (CHP); Complementary judgment matrix (CJM); Evaluation; Feasible weight space (FWS); Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA); Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA)

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; INVESTMENTS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; COMPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT MATRIX; EVALUATION; FEASIBLE WEIGHT SPACE (FWS); MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MULTICRITERIA ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSES (SMAA);

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 84921713907     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19961073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/en8010059     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Xu, J.Z., Sui, J., Li, B.Y., Yang, M.L. Research, development and the prospect of combined cooling, heating, and power systems. Energy 2010, 11, 4361-4367.
2. Ge, Z.H., Hu, X.W., Yang, Z.P. The application of energy step utilize in co-generation (in Chinese). J. North China Electr. Power Univ. 2010, 1, 66-68.
3. Conde Lázaro, E., Ramos Millán, A., Reina Peral, P. Analysis of cogeneration in the present energy framework. Fuel Process. Technol. 2006, 87, 63-68.
4. Wang, H.C., Jiao, W.L., Lahdelma, R., Zou, P.H., Zhan, S.H. Atmospheric environmental impact assessment of a combined district heating system. Build. Environ. 2013, 64, 200-212.
5. Lund, H., Siupsinskas, G., Martinaitis, V. Implementation strategy for small CHP-plants in a competitive market: The case of Lithuania. Appl. Energy 2005, 82, 211-227.
6. Rong, A., Hakonen, H., Lahdelma, R. An efficient linear model and optimisation algorithm for multi-site combined heat and power production. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 168, 612-632.
7. International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Technology Perspectives, 2012. Available online: http://www.iea.org/w/bookshop/add.aspx?id=425 (accessed on 27 December 2013).
8. Frederiksen, S., Werner, S. District Heating and Cooling; Studentlitteratur AB: Lund, Sweden, 2013; pp. 1-16.
9. Huang, J. Comprehensive Evaluation for the Setup of Peak Heating Using Gas Fired Boiler. Master's Thesis, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China, 2008.
10. Statistics Finland. Energy, 2012. Available online: http://www.stat.fi/til/ene_en.html (accessed on 4 January 2014)..
11. Sustainable Transition of European Energy Markets. STEEM Project Description. Available online: http://energytech.aalto.fi/fi/research/energy_efficiency_and_systems/energy_economics_and_power_ plant_engineering/steem/ (accessed on 27 December 2013).
12. Rong, A., Lahdelma, R. Efficient algorithms for combined heat and power production planning under the deregulated electricity market. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 176, 1219-1245.
13. Balli, O., Aras, H. Energetic and exergetic performance evaluation of a combined heat and power system with the micro gas turbine (MGTCHP). Int. J. Energy Res. 2007, 31, 1425-1440.
14. Ertesvag, I.S. Exergetic comparison of efficiency indicators for combined heat and power (CHP). Energy 2007, 32, 2038-2050.
15. Fryda, L., Panopoulos, K.D., Kakaras, E. Integrated CHP with autothermal biomass gasification and SOFC-MGT. Energy Convers. Manag. 2008, 49, 281-290.
16. Biezma, M.V., San Cristobal, J.R. Investment criteria for the selection of cogeneration plants-A state of the art review. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2006, 26, 583-588.
17. Hinojosa, L.R., Day, A.R., Maidment, G.G., Dunham, C., Kirk, P. A comparison of combined heat and power feasibility models. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2007, 27, 2166-2172.
18. Hawkes, A.D., Leach, M.A. Cost-effective operating strategy for residential micro-combined heat and power. Energy 2007, 32, 711-723.
19. Zheng, Z., Fu, L., Di, H., Jiang, Y. Comprehensive evaluation of urban heating types with analytic hierarchy process. Heat. Vent. Air Cond. 2009, 8, 96-98. (In Chinese)
20. Clemen, R.T. Making Hard Decisions-An Introduction to Decision Analysis, 2nd ed., Duxbury Press/Wadsworth Publishing Company: Belmont, CA, USA, 1996.
21. Hyde, K., Maier, H.R., Colby, C. Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method. J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal. 2003, 12, 245-259.
22. Troldborg, M., Heslop, S., Hough, R.L. Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 1173-1184.
23. Zarghami, M., Szidarovszky, F. Stochastic-fuzzy multi criteria decision making for robust water resources management. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2009, 23, 329-339.
24. Durbach, I.N., Stewart, T.J. Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 223, 1-14.
25. Tylock, S.M., Seager, T.P., Snell, J., Bennett, E.R., Sweet, D. Energy management under policy and technology uncertainty. Energy Policy 2012, 47, 156-163.
26. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S. Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2015, 240, 172-182.
27. Afgan, N.H., Carvalho, M.G. Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants. Energy 2002, 27, 739-755.
28. Pilavachi, P.A., Roumpeas, C.P., Minett, S., Afgan, N.H. Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options. Energy Convers. Manag. 2006, 47, 3519-3529.
29. Afgan, N.H., Pilavachi, P.A., Carvalho, M.G. Multi-criteria evaluation of natural gas resources. Energy Policy 2007, 1, 704-713.
30. Wang, J.J., Jing, Y.Y., Zhang, C.F. Weighting methodologies in multi-criteria evaluations of combined heat and power systems. Int. J. Energy Res. 2009, 33, 1023-1039.
31. Saaty, T.L., Peniwati, K. Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences; RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2008.
32. Hokkanen, J., Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P. Multicriteria decision support in a technology competition for cleaning polluted soil in Helsinki. J. Environ. Manag. 2000, 60, 339-348.
33. Lv, Y.J. Weight calculation method of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 2002, 16, 80-86.
34. Su, W.H. Study on Multicriteria Comprehensive Evaluation Theories and Methodologies. Ph.D. Thesis, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China, 2000.
35. Wang, H.C., Jiao, W.L., Lahdelma, R., Zou, P.H. Development of multicriteria index system and weighting optimization for a district heating system. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium and 10th Balkan Conference on Operational Research, Thessaloniki, Greece, 22-25 September 2011.
36. Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., Salminen, P. SMAA-Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1998, 106, 137-143.
37. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P. SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Oper. Res. 2001, 3, 444-454.
38. Lahdelma, R., Miettinen, K., Salminen, P. Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003, 147, 117-127.
39. Tervonen, T., Lahdelma, R. Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 178, 500-513.