Energy management under policy and technology uncertainty

Energy Policy

Volumn 47, Issue , 2012, Pages 156-163

  Tylock, Steven M ^a   Seager, Thomas P ^b   Snell, Jeff ^c   Bennett, Erin R ^c   Sweet, Don ^a  

^a Sustainable Intelligence   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

^c Bioengineering Group   (United States)

Author keywords

MCDA; Stakeholders; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; ANALYTIC APPROACH; DECISION PROBLEMS; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; DIFFERENT DISTRIBUTIONS; ENERGY INITIATIVES; ENERGY MANAGERS; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT; INVESTMENT DECISIONS; MCDA; MILITARY BASE; MULTI-ATTRIBUTES; MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS; POLICY OBJECTIVES; PUBLIC AGENCIES; RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGY; STAKEHOLDERS; STATE LAWS; TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY UNCERTAINTY; UNCERTAINTY; WEIGHTING SCHEME;

ENERGY MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENTS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS; TECHNOLOGY;

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY POLICY; INVESTMENT; STAKEHOLDER; STOCHASTICITY; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 84862268965     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.040     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management (ACSIM), 2005. The U.S. Army Energy Strategy for Installations July 8, 2005. Archived by WebCite® at (accessed 14.02.12). http://www.webcitation.org/65S6HfGdw.
2. Bush G.W. Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management. Federal Register 2007, 72(17):3919-3923. Executive Order 13423.
3. Canis L., Linkov I., Seager T.P. Application of stochastic multiattribute analysis to assessment of single walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44(22):8704-8711.
4. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewal Energy, 2010, Proposed Rules: Fossil Fuel Generated Energy Consumption Reduction for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal Buildings, Federal Register. Vol. 75, no. 199.
5. DSIRE, 2012a. California-Renewables Portfolio Standard. In California Incentives/Policies for Renewables & Efficiency. Retrieved 2012-02-14, from Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/65S9N7BgA.
6. DSIRE, 2012b. California-Net Metering. In California Incentives/Policies for Renewables & Efficiency. Retrieved 2012-02-14, from Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/65S9rMbbF.
7. DSIRE, 2012c. Colorado-Renewable Energy Standard. In Colorado Incentives/Policies for Renewables & Efficiency. Retrieved 2012-02-14, from Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/65SAjCIvp.
8. DSIRE, 2012d. Colorado-Net Metering. In Colorado Incentives/Policies for Renewables & Efficiency. Retrieved 2012-02-14, from Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/65SArP5GE.
9. Dorini G., Kapelan Z., Azapagic A. Managing uncertainty in multiple-criteria decision making related to sustainability assessment. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2011, 13(1):133-139.
10. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, 42 U.S.C. 17001
11. Energy Policy Act of 2005, 42 U.S.C. 15801.
12. Trends Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys 2005, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. J.R. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott (Eds.).
13. Frigyik, B.A., Kapila, A., Gupta, M.R., 2010. Introduction to the Dirichlet Distribution and Related Processes. UWEE Technical Report Number UWEETR-2010-0006. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
14. Greening L., Bernow S. Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making. Energy Policy 2004, 32(6):721-735.
15. Grone, P.W., 2005. Installation Energy Policy Goals November, 2005. Nov 2005 policy-Grone.pdf. Archived by WebCite® at (accessed 14.02.2012). http://www.webcitation.org/65S7FboMp.
16. Interagency Sustainability Working Group, 2007. Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings: Memorandum of Understanding November 7, 2007. Archived by WebCite® at (accessed 14.02.2012). http://www.webcitation.org/65S03uR1q.
17. Lahdelma R., Hokkanen J., Salminen P. SMAA-stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 1998, 106(1):137-143.
18. Lahdelma R., Miettinen K., Salminen P. Reference point approach for multiple decision makers. European Journal of Operational Research 2005, 164(3):785-791.
19. Lahdelma R., Salminen P. SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research 2001, 49(3):444-454.
20. Lahdelma R., Salminen P. Chapter 10 Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis 2010, 285-316. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Ehrgott, S. Greco, J. Figueira (Eds.).
21. Loken E. Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2007, 11(7):1584-1595.
22. Mousseau V. Eliciting information concerning the relative importance of criteria. Advances in Multicriteria Analysis 1995, 17-43. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Y. Pardalos, C. Siskos, C. Zopounidis (Eds.).
23. National Defense Authorization Act of 2007, 10 U.S.C. 2911.
24. Obama B. Federal leadership in environmental, energy, and economic performance. Federal Register 2009, 74(194):52117-52127. Executive Order 13,514.
25. Pohekar S.D., Ramachandran M. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2004, 8(4):365-381.
26. Rogers, K. 2008. Environmental Decision-Making Using Life Cycle Impact Assessment and Stochastic Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis. Masters Thesis. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
27. Rogers K., Seager T.P. Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels. Environmental Science and Technology 2009, 43(6):1718-1723.
28. Tervonen, T. JSMAA: open source software for SMAA computations. International Journal of Systems Science., in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2012.659706.
29. Tervonen T., Figueira J.R. A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2008, 15(1-2):1-14.
30. Tervonen T., Figueira J.R., Lahdelma R., Dias J.A., Salminen P. A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 192:236-242.
31. Tervonen T., Lahdelma R. Implementing Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 178:500-513.
32. Yatsalo B.I., Kiker G.A., Kim J., Bridges T.S., Seager T.P., Gardner K., Satterstrom F.K., Linkov I. Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis Tools to two Contaminated Sediment Case Studies. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2007, 3(2):223-233.