Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 39, Issue , 2014, Pages 1173-1184

  Troldborg, Mads ^a   Heslop, Simon ^a   Hough, Rupert L ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Monte Carlo simulation; Multi criteria analysis; Renewable energy; Sustainability; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENERGY POLICY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

DATA AND INFORMATION; MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS; PROBABILISTIC RANKING; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRITERION; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84905859080     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.160     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. REN21, 2012. Renewables 2012. Global status report. Renewable energy policy network for the 21st century (REN21). Paris: REN21 Secretariat; 2012
2. Scottish Government 2020 renewable routemap for Scotland - update 2012 Scottish Government Edinburgh
3. S. Frick, M. Kaltschmitt, and G. Schroeder Life cycle assessment of geothermal binary power plants using enhanced low-temperature reservoirs Energy 35 5 2010 2281 2294
4. L. Gagnon, C. Belanger, and Y. Uchiyama Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: the status of research in year 2001 Energy Policy 30 14 2002 1267 1278 (Pubitemid 35029031)
5. B. Greening, and A. Azapagic Domestic heat pumps: life cycle environmental impacts and potential implications for the UK Energy 39 1 2012 205 217
6. H. Hondo Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case Energy 30 11-12 2005 2042 2056
7. N. Jungbluth, C. Bauer, R. Dones, and R. Frischknecht Life cycle assessment for emerging technologies: case studies for photovoltaic and wind power Int J Life Cycle Assess 10 1 2005 24 34 (Pubitemid 40052145)
8. M. Pehnt Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies Renewable Energy 31 1 2006 55 71
9. Y. Uchiyarna Life cycle assessment of renewable energy generation technologies IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng 2 1 2007 44 48
10. C. Benoit-Norris, G. Vickery-Niederman, S. Valdivia, J. Franze, M. Traverso, and A. Ciroth et al. Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA Int J Life Cycle Assess 16 7 2011 682 690
11. M. Hauschild, L. Dreyer, and A. Jorgensen Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective - lessons learned CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 57 1 2008 21 24
12. A. Lehmann, D. Russi, A. Bala, M. Finkbeiner, and I.P. Fullana Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking Sustainability 3 4 2011 562 577
13. A. Evans, V. Strezov, and T.J. Evans Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 13 5 2009 1082 1088
14. J.J. Wang, Y.Y. Jing, C.F. Zhang, and J.H. Zhao Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 13 9 2009 2263 2278
15. M. Beccali, M. Cellura, and M. Mistretta Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology Renewable Energy 28 13 2003 2063 2087 (Pubitemid 37007993)
16. D. Browne, B. O'Regan, and R. Moles Use of multi-criteria decision analysis to explore alternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region Energy 35 2 2010 518 528
17. J. Burton, and K. Hubacek Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governments Energy Policy 35 12 2007 6402 6412 (Pubitemid 350028948)
18. T. Tsoutsos, M. Drandaki, N. Frantzeskaki, E. Iosifidis, and I. Kiosses Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete Energy Policy 37 5 2009 1587 1600
19. A.I. Chatzimouratidis, and P.A. Pilavachi Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process Energy Policy 36 3 2008 1074 1089
20. D. Streimikiene, T. Balezentis, I. Krisciukaitiene, and A. Balezentis Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 16 5 2012 3302 3311
21. E.W. Stein A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 22 2013 640 654
22. S.D. Pohekar, and M. Ramachandran Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - a review Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 8 4 2004 365 381
23. M. Beccali, M. Cellura, and D. Ardente Decision making in energy planning: the ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach compared to a fuzzy-sets methodology Energy Convers Manage 39 16-18 1998 1869 1881 (Pubitemid 128409924)
24. M. Goumas, and V. Lygerou An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects Eur J Oper Res 123 3 2000 606 613
25. J. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Jing, and G. Zheng Using the fuzzy multi-criteria model to select the optimal cool storage system for air conditioning Energy Build 40 11 2008 2059 2066
26. H.C. Doukas, B.M. Andreas, and J.E. Psarras Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables Eur J Oper Res 182 2 2007 844 855 (Pubitemid 46654646)
27. J.P. Brans, P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal How to select and how to rank projects - the promethee method Eur J Oper Res 24 2 1986 228 238 (Pubitemid 16494701)
28. DECC Renewable electricity capacity and generation 2013 Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/ uploads/attachment-data/file/65859/et6-1.xls (accessed May 2014)
29. D.J. C. MacKay Sustainable energy - without the hot air 2009 UIT Cambridge Ltd Cambridge, UK
30. Scottish Government, Deep Geothermal. Scottish Government. Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0038/00389365.pdf (accessed 09/09/2013); 2012.
31. SISER Solar energy in Scotland 2012 Scottish Institute for Solar Energy Research (SISER)
32. Energy Saving Trust, 2013. Renewable Heat in Scotland, 2012. A report by the Energy Saving Trust for the Scottish Government.
33. A.I. Chatzimouradis, and P.A. Pilavachi Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Energy Policy 37 3 2009 778 787
34. J. San Cristobal Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method Renewable Energy 36 2 2011 498 502
35. Cavallaro, F., An integrated multi-criteria system to assess sustainable energy options: an application of the PROMETHEE method. FEEM working paper No. 22.05; 2005.
36. E. Georgopoulou, Y. Sarafidis, and D. Diakoulaki Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation Eur J Oper Res 109 2 1998 483 500 (Pubitemid 128417847)
37. T. Boehme, J. Taylor, A.R. Wallace, and J. Bialek Matching renewable electricity generation with demand The Scottish Executive, Edinburgh 2006
38. Carss, R., Renewable Heat in Scotland, 2012. A report by the Energy Saving Trust for the Scottish Government; 2013.
39. Faber Maunsell and Metoc. Scottish marine renewables - strategic environmental asessment (SEA). Report prepared for the Scottish Executive by Faber Maunsell and Metoc Plc; 2007.
40. P. Gardner Options for coping with high renewable penetration in Scotland 2010 Prepared for Friends of the Earth Scotland by Garrad Hassan & Partners Ltd
41. A.S. Iyer, S.J. Couch, G.P. Harrison, and A.R. Wallace Variability and phasing of tidal current energy around the United Kingdom Renewable Energy 51 2013 343 357
42. Scottish Executive, 2005. Scotland's renewable energy potential - realising the 2020 target. Produced for the Scottish Executive by Astron B42033, Edinburgh; 2005.
43. H. Snodin Scotland's renewable resource vol. I 2001 The Analysis. Prepared by Garrad Hassan and Partners Limited for the Scottish Executive 2001
44. M. Kemp, and J. Wexler Zero carbon Britain 2030 - a new energy strategy. Kemp M and Wexler J Centre for alternative technology 2010 CAT Publications
45. T. Helweg-Larsen, and J. Bull Zero carbon Britain - an alternative energy strategy. Foxon F Centre for alternative technology 2007 CAT Publications
46. 2 emissions - nuclear and the alternatives; 2006.
47. D. Diakoulaki, and F. Karangelis Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 11 4 2007 716 727 (Pubitemid 44344535)
48. E.L. La Rovere, J.B. Soares, L.B. Oliveira, and T. Lauria Sustainable expansion of electricity sector: sustainability indicators as an instrument to support decision making Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14 1 2010 422 429
49. A. Kumar, T. Schei, A. Ahenkorah, R. Caceres Rodriguez, J.-M. Devernay, and M. Freitas et al. Hydropower. BO Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, K Seyboth, P Matschoss, S Kadner, T Zwickel, P Eickemeier, G Hansen, S Schlömer, C von Stechow, In: IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation 2011 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
50. T. Bruckner, H. Chum, A. Jäger-Waldau, Å. Killingtveit, L. Gutiérrez-Negrín, and J. Nyboer et al. Annex III: Cost table. In: IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation BO Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, K Seyboth, P Matschoss, S Kadner, T Zwickel, P Eickemeier, G Hansen, S Schlömer, C von Stechow, 2011 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
51. L. Cosijns, and W. D'haeseleer EUSUSTEL. European sustainable electricity; comprehensive analysis of future European demand and generation of European electricity and its security of supply 2007 European Commission 006602
52. I. MacLeay, K. Harris, and A. Annut Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2013. Chapter 6: Renewable sources of energy (Department of Energy & Climate Change) 2013 A National Statistics Publication
53. N.H. Afgan, and M.G. Carvalho Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants Energy 27 8 2002 739 755 (Pubitemid 34961698)
54. M.K. Mann, and P.L. Spath A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant Clean Prod Processes 3 2 2001 81 91
55. N.Y. Amponsah, M. Troldborg, B. Kington, I. Aalders, and R.L. Hough Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: a review of lifecycle considerations Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 39 2014 461 475
56. R. Turconi, A. Boldrin, and T. Astrup Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 28 2013 555 565
57. K. Kelly, M. McManus, and G. Hammond An energy and carbon life cycle assessment of tidal power case study: the proposed Cardiff-Weston severn barrage scheme Energy 44 1 2012 692 701
58. C. Jury, E. Benetto, D. Koster, B. Schmitt, and J. Welfring Life cycle assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid Biomass Bioenergy 34 1 2010 54 66
59. S.L. Dolan, and G.A. Heath Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of utility-scale wind power J Ind Ecol 16 2012 S136 S154
60. D.D. Hsu, P. O'Donoughue, V. Fthenakis, G.A. Heath, H.C. Kim, and P. Sawyer et al. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of crystalline silicon photovoltaic electricity generation J Ind Ecol 16 2012 S122 S135
61. F. Cherubini, N.D. Bird, A. Cowie, G. Jungmeier, B. Schlamadinger, and S. Woess-Gallasch Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations Res Conserv Recycl 53 8 2009 434 447
62. IPCC IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, K Seyboth, P Matschoss, S Kadner, T Zwickel, P Eickemeier, G Hansen, S Schlömer, and C von Stechow Prepared by working Group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2011 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
63. D.A. Haralambopoulos, and H. Polatidis Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework Renewable Energy 28 6 2003 961 973 (Pubitemid 36029416)
64. F. Cavallaro, and L. Ciraolo A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island Energy Policy 33 2 2005 235 244 (Pubitemid 39033186)
65. R. Bertani World geothermal power generation in the period 2001-2005 Geothermics 34 6 2005 651 690 (Pubitemid 41700296)
66. F. Evrendilek, and C. Ertekin Assessing the potential of renewable energy sources in Turkey Renewable Energy 28 15 2003 2303 2315 (Pubitemid 36941677)
67. N. Onat, and H. Bayar The sustainability indicators of power production systems Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14 9 2010 3108 3115
68. J.W. De Vries, T.M.W.J. Vinken, L. Hamelin, and I.J.M. De Boer Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy - a life cycle perspective Bioresour Technol 125 2012 239 248
69. G. Allan, M. Gilmartin, P. McGregor, and K. Swales Levelised costs of wave and tidal energy in the UK: cost competitiveness and the importance of "banded" renewables obligation certificates Energy Policy 39 1 2011 23 39
70. A. Dalla Rosa, and J. Christensen Low-energy district heating in energy-efficient building areas Energy 36 12 2011 6890 6899
71. DECC. UK electricity generation cost update. Prepared by Mott MacDonald. Commisioned by Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC); 2010.
72. DECC. Review of the generation costs and deployment potential of renewable electricity technologies in the UK. Prepared by Arup. Commissioned by Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC); 2011.
73. DECC. UK Renewable Energy Roadmap. Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC); 2011.
74. Ernst, and Young Impact of banding the renewables obligation - cost of electricity production 2007 Prepared by Ernst and Young. Commisioned by Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
75. M Dolman, B. Madden, C. Summers, P. Klevnas, and D. Radov Achieving deployment of renewable heat 2011 Prepared by Element Energy Ltd and NERA Economic Consulting for the Committee on Climate Change
76. Mott MacDonald Cost of low-carbon technologies 2010 Prepared by Mott MacDonald for The Committee on Climate Change
77. F. Begic, and N.H. Afgan Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system-Bosnian case Energy 32 10 2007 1979 1985 (Pubitemid 47176235)
78. R. Bacon, and M. Kojima Issues in estimating the employment generated by energy sector activities 2011 Sustainable Energy Department. World Bank
79. IRENA, 2011. Renewable energy jobs. Status, prospects & policies. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), IRENA working paper; 2011.
80. J. Rutovitz, and A. Atherton Energy sector jobs to 2030: a global analysis 2009 Prepared for Greenpeace International by Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney
81. J. Rutovitz, and J. Usher Methodology for calculating energy sector jobs 2010 Prepared for Greenpeace International by the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney
82. M. Wei, S. Patadia, and D.M. Kammen Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work: how many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US? Energy Policy 38 2 2010 919 931
83. M. Ragwitz, W. Schade, B. Breitschopf, R. Walz, N. Helfrich, and M. Rathmann et al. EmployRES: the impact of renewable energy policy on economic growth and employment in the European Union 2009 European Commission (TREN/D1/474/2006)
84. G. Dalton, and T. Lewis Metrics for measuring job creation by renewable energy technologies, using Ireland as a case study Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15 4 2011 2123 2133
85. D.M. Kammen, K. Kapadia, and M. Fripp Putting renewables to work: how many jobs can the clean industry generate? 2004 University of California Berkely (RAEL report)
86. J. Pfeifenberger, J. Chang, D. Hou, and K. Madjarov Job and economic benefits of transmission and wind generation investments in the SPP region 2010 Prepared for the Soutwest Power Pool (SPP) by the Brattle Group
87. J. West, I. Bailey, and M. Winter Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: a cultural theory approach Energy Policy 38 10 2010 5739 5748
88. P. Devine-Wright Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: a UK case study Energy Policy 39 1 2011 83 93
89. DECC DECC public attitudes tracker: Wave 5 2013 Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public- attitudes-tracking-survey-wave-5 (accessed May 2014)
90. C.R. Jones, and J. Eiser Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study Energy Policy 37 11 2009 4604 4614
91. P. Devine-Wright Explaining "NIMBY" objections to a power line: the role of personal, place attachment and project-related factors Environ Behav 45 6 2013 761 781
92. C.R. Warren, C. Lumsden, S. O'Dowd, and R.V. Birnie 'Green On Green': public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland J Environ Plann Manage 48 6 2005 853 875 (Pubitemid 41823556)
93. D. van der Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies Energy Policy 35 5 2007 2705 2714
94. BERR. Renewable energy awareness and attitudes research. Prepared by GfK NOP Scoial research. Commissioned by the Department for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform (BERR), URN 08/657; 2008.
95. McGowan, F., Sauter, R. Public opinion on energy research: a desk study for the research councils. prepared by the sussex energy group. commissioned by engineering and physical sciences research council (EPSRC); 2005.
96. Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I. Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: summary findings of a survey conducted during October and November 2005. Norwich: centre for environmental risk, technical report (understanding risk working paper 06-02); 2006.
97. YouGov. YouGov/Scottish renewables survey results. Survey by YouGov. Commission by Socttish Renewables; 2013.
98. A.M. Dowd, N. Boughen, P. Ashworth, and S. Carr-Cornish Geothermal technology in Australia: investigating social acceptance Energy Policy 39 10 2011 6301 6307
99. K. Hyde, H.R. Maier, and C.B. Colby Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method J Multi-criteria Decis Anal 12 2003 245 259
100. J. Geldermann, T. Spengler, and O. Rentz Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry Fuzzy Sets Syst 115 1 2000 45 65
101. H. Singh, A. Muetze, and P. Eames Factors influencing the uptake of heat pump technology by the UK domestic sector Renewable Energy 35 4 2010 873 878
102. K.M. Hyde, H.R. Maier, and C.B. Colby A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making J Environ Manage 77 4 2005 278 290 (Pubitemid 41799913)