A method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics

Bioethics

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 302-312

  Ives, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Empirical bioethics; Empirical ethics; Interdisciplinary ethics; Naturalism; Pragmatism; Reflexive bioethics; Scepticism

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; COOPERATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MORALITY; PROCEDURES;

BIOETHICS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MORALS;

EID: 84921692976     PISSN: 02699702     EISSN: 14678519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12018     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. T. Pratchett. 2011. Snuff. London: Doubleday: 373.
2. R. Fox & J. Swazy. 2008. Observing Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. A. Hedgecoe. 2007. Medical Sociology and the Redundancy of Empirical Ethics. In Principles of Health Care Ethics. A. Dawson et al., eds. Chippenham: Wiley.
4. C. Herrera. Is it Time for Bioethics to Go Empirical? Bioethics 2008; 22(3): 137-146.
5. J. Ives & H. Draper. Appropriate Methodologies for Empirical Bioethics: It's All Relative. Bioethics 2009; 23(4): 249-258.
6. L. Frith. Symbiotic Bioethics: A Practical Methodology. Bioethics 2010; 26(4): 198-206.
7. E. Racine. Which Naturalism for Bioethics: A Defense of Moderate (pragmatic) Naturalism. Bioethics 2008; 22(2): 99-100.
8. H. Putnam. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value distinction and other essays. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
9. J. Dewey. 1922. Human nature and human conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Holt. Quoted in E. I discuss some of the problems associated with this kind of bioethics in a paper with Mikey Dunn
10. J. Ives & M. Dunn. 2010. Who's Arguing? A Call for Reflexivity in Bioethics. Bioethics 2010; 24(5): 256-265.
11. G. McGee, ed. 2003 Pragmatic Bioethics. Sabon: Vanderbilt University Press.
12. H. Putnam. 2005. Ethics without ontology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press: 31.
13. R. Huxtable. 2012. Law, Ethics and Compromise at the Limits of Life: To Treat or not to Treat? London: Routledge-Cavendish: 8.
14. E. Cooke. On the Possibility of a Pragmatic Discourse Bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the Normative Logic of Bioethical Inquiry. J Med Philos 2003; 28(5-6): 635-653).
15. Y. Barilan & M. Brusa. Triangular Reflective Equilibrium: A Conscience-based Method for Bioethical Deliberation. Bioethics 2011; 25(6): 304-319
16. M. De Vries & E. van Leeuwen. Reflective Equilibrium and Empirical Data: Third Person Moral Experiences in Empirical Medical Ethics. Bioethics 2010; 24(9): 490-498
17. J. Ives & H. Draper Appropriate Methods for Empirical Bioethics? It's All Relative. Bioethics 2008; 23(4): 249-258
18. J. van Delden & G. Van Thiel. 1998. Reflective Equalibrium as a Normative-Empirical Model in Bioethics. In Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of R. Heeger. W. Van der Burg & T. van Willigenburg, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 251-259.
19. J. D. Arras. 2006. The way we reason now: Reflective Equlibrium in Bioethics. In The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. B. Steinbock, ed. King's Lynn: Oxford University Press: 48.
20. C. Strong. Theoretical and Practical Problems with Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth 2010; 31: 123-140.
21. N. Daniels. Justice and justification: reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. 1996. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. J. Dancy. 1991. Introduction to contemporary epistemology. Padstow: Blackwell: 118.
23. J. Swift. 1729. A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of the Poor People in Ireland from Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to Their Public. Project Guttenberg. URL: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1080/1080-h/1080-h.htm. [Accessed 10th Aug 2012].
24. W. V. Quine. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 1951; 60(1): 20-43, 39-40.
25. A. Hedgecoe. Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique. Bioethics 2004; 18(2): 120-143, 138.
26. D. Archard. Why moral philosophers are not and should not be moral experts. Bioethics 2011; 25(3): 119-127.
27. R. Collier. 2010. Men. Law and Gender: Essays on the 'man' of law. Bodmin: Routledge.
28. D. De Grazia. Moving forward in Bioethical theory: Theories, Cases, and Specified Principlism. J Med Philos 1992; 17: 511-539.
29. M. De Wachter. Interdisciplinary Bioethics: But where do we start? A reflection on Epoche as Method. J Med Philos 1982; 7: 275-287, 286.
30. T. Nagel. 1986. The View From Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. J. Ives & H. Draper. Appropriate Methodologies for Empirical Bioethics: It's all Relative. Bioethics 2009; 23(4): 249-258
32. J. Ives. 'Encounters with Experience': Empirical Bioethics and the Future. Health Care Analysis 2008; 16: 1-6.
33. D. Silverman. 2004. Interpreting Qualitative Sata: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
34. A. Strauss & J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.