Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BJU International

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 206-215

  Autorino, Riccardo ^a,b   Brandao, Luis Felipe ^a   Sankari, Bashir ^a,d   Zargar, Homayoun ^a   Laydner, Humberto ^a   Akça, Oktay ^a   De Sio, Marco ^b   Mirone, Vincenzo ^c   Chueh, Shih Chieh J ^a   Kaouk, Jihad H ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^d HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

donor nephrectomy; laparoendoscopic single site surgery; laparoscopic; meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; CREATININE;

ARTICLE; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONOR; LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ENDOSCOPY; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATIVE TIME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WARM ISCHEMIA;

EID: 84921547965     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12724     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ibrahim IN, Foley R, Tan L, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 459-469
2. Antcliffe D, Nanidis TG, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Papalois VE,. A meta-analysis of mini-open versus standard open and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2009; 22: 463-474
3. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR,. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60: 1047-1049
4. Wadström J, Martin AL, Estok R, Mercaldi CJ, Stifelman MD,. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopy versus open and laparoscopic techniques in urology procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1095-1104
5. Bachmann A, Wolff T, Ruszat R, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the standard open approach. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 90-96
6. Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M, et al. Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2008; 180: 637-641
7. Alcaraz A, Musquera M, Peri L, et al. Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future? Eur Urol 2011; 59: 1019-1025
8. Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Laydner H, et al. Transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal surgery robotic donor nephrectomy: first clinical application. Urology 2012; 80: 1171-1175
9. Breda A, Villamizar JM, Faba OR, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with the use of 3-mm instruments and laparoscope: initial experience at a tertiary center. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 840-844
10. Renoult E, Hubert J, Ladrière M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 472-477
11. Greco F, Hoda MR, Alcaraz A, Bachmann A, Hakenberg OW, Fornara P,. Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: analysis of the existing literature. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 498-509
12. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 998-1005
13. Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg JU, et al. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 266-280
14. Fan X, Lin T, Xu K, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 601-612
15. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Web site, Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed May 2013
16. Clark HD, Wells GA, Huët C, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials: 395 reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trials 1999; 20: 448-452
17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: 398 a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients 399 and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
18. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I,. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13
19. Matel N, Haenszel W,. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959; 22: 719-748
20. DerSimonian R, Laird N,. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
21. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 95-101
22. Afaneh C, Aull MJ, Gimenez E, et al. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor and recipient outcomes. Urology 2011; 78: 1332-1337
23. Lunsford KE, Harris MT, Nicoll KN, et al. Single-site laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy offers comparable perioperative outcomes to conventional laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy at a higher cost. Transplantation 2011; 91: e16-17
24. Ramasamy R, Afaneh C, Katz M, et al. Comparison of complications of laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy using the modified Clavien grading system. J Urol 2011; 186: 1386-1390
25. Andonian S, Rais-Bahrami S, Atalla MA, Herati AS, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR,. Laparoendoscopic single-site Pfannenstiel versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 2010; 24: 429-432
26. Stamatakis L, Mercado MA, Choi JM, et al. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at a single institution. BJU Int 2013; 112: 198-206
27. Barth RN, Phelan MW, Goldschen L, et al. Single-port donor nephrectomy provides improved patient satisfaction and equivalent outcomes. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 527-533
28. Kurien A, Rajapurkar S, Sinha L, et al. First prize: standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study. J Endourol 2011; 25: 365-370
29. Richstone L, Rais-Bahrami S, Waingankar N, et al. Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs conventional multiport laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized Controlled trial. BJU Int 2013; 112: 616-622
30. Kaouk JH, Autorino R,. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and nephrectomy: current evidence and future perspectives. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 613-615
31. Schold JD, Goldfarb DA, Buccini LD, et al. Comorbidity Burden and Perioperative Complications for Living Kidney Donors in the United States. Clin. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8: 1773-1782
32. Chedid MF, Muthu C, Nyberg SL, et al. Living donor kidney transplantation using laparoscopically procured multiple renal artery kidneys and right kidneys. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 144-152
33. Hellegering J, Visser J, Kloke HJ, et al. Deleterious influence of prolonged warm ischemia in living donor kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 1222-1226
34. Abouchacra S, Chaaban A, Hakim R, et al. Renal biomarkers for assessment of kidney function in renal transplant recipients: how do they compare? Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 44: 1871-1876
35. Richstone L, Seideman C, Baldinger L, et al. Conversion during laparoscopic surgery: frequency, indications and risk factors. J Urol 2008; 180: 855-859
36. Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Yakoubi R, et al. Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery: multi-institutional analysis of risk factors for conversion and postoperative complications. J Urol 2012; 187: 1989-1994
37. Greco F, Cindolo L, Autorino R, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site upper urinary tract surgery: assessmentof postoperative complications and analysis of risk factors. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 510-516